1.9.23 Conservation Commission

welcome to the forward Conservation Commission meeting uh public meeting being held uh Monday July I mean July January 19 2023 and 5 30 in the first floor meeting room one government center Fall River consider the following uh petition is listed in this notice um pursuant to the open meeting laws any person may make an audio or video recording of this public meeting are made transmit the meeting through any

meeting with teams are therefore advised that such recordings of Transmissions are being made whether perceived or unperceived by those present and our team acknowledged and permissible and we start with roll call we'll start at Chris Boyle here who's forer John Brandt Jim Cusick Paul Admiral James winsby and we also have tonight uh Nino Pavo back uh conservation uh recording agent uh

Dan aguiar conservation agent and from frgtv Gary lease um first on the agenda tonight is a request for a certificate of compliance for se-24-769 owner applicants Highland Farms development 2 LLC project location is 30 Brookfield Terrace assistance map is um04-0063 filed by Highland Farms development 2 LLC application requested certificate of compliance at the time for inspection I'll work regulated by

order conditions have been satisfactory completed this has continued hearing from December 5th 2022 Our Last Action we sent out a letter to the applicant commission members what I can offer is I did speak with the owner of the property today she has been in contact with the original design engineer multiple times about putting together this notice of intent this is the one to put the pool

so she's just been waiting for him to finish the work that he was supposed to be doing I did explain to her that she has to she's the one that has to push this to get this done because what the next step would be would be an enforcement action which would be the next step that that you could take she did tell me that she has been calling there daily I know the

consulting firm and I know how backed up they are and this is I said well you need to hire someone else and you need to hire someone else so she understands that completely and again however whatever I recommended any of these agent reports I do not vote so by all means you have the authority to make any motion and vote any way that that you find so you have two options today one

is to either table the matter until she files the notice of intent or two you could require a file of an enforcement action and take it to the next step so that's that's where you're at with what you can do tonight on this year question for you yeah was um did she reach out to you did you have to reach out there I well originally when I sent her the letter she reached out to me I

could speak with her I put her in contact with the original engineer that did the work because they had already all of the information um so he they just have not followed through with doing this little bit of work that this woman needs I did read I reached out to her today as a check-in knowing that the meeting was coming to say hey give me an update like I did on

all of them a way or action you call me back and that's what she explained is that she had called that multiple times to actually has a proposal she signed it sent it back so she just waiting for the work to be done want to move on the sense of urgency and send an enforcement action I have no I have no issue with that I'd make a motion to do that

yeah because I mean this has been on the agenda for a long time and if she's already in contact with the person responsible for making sure that this is done the right way like Dan is saying then you know until the next meeting I think that's plenty of time to at least get something that we're going to be happy with well my question would be um the additional imperative surface was

that part of the asphalt plan do you know I know it's a tough question I can't hear you Chris okay sorry Jim so the there's a there was additional impervious surface a stone patio stone walkway I don't know if it was in the ass bill um but there was no permit for it as far as I know the patio area and the pool area absolutely were not permitted activities which you would all of her work is

probably within the limit of work of what was approved but those actual items of impervious area and a pool were not so so those do need to get permitted and she was in maybe she was in there she's into the BBW because it's popular we don't know until the new plan gets submitted upon going out to look at it she's pretty close she's either right at it or potentially

in it but you don't know that until you get an engineer drawing that gets submitted so that's my opinion if you guys think that we should no it's been out of your channel it's been on the agenda quite some time and I think by doing this it's going to show her that we're serious about it give her another at least sometime until the next video for Dan to get some update something that he's happy with

and then we can take it from there what are we going to do we're going to keep tabling this I mean the first letter was sent out we're back in Japan

I agree and like I said I mean that's my personal opinion if you guys want to table it and make a motion we send it um yes all right okay next one is request for certificate of compliance se-24-739 older applicant is cml2 LLC project location is 507 Alden Street assessors mattress j-21-001 and 0005 applicable questions descriptive Appliance City all work regulated by the order of conditions

have been satisfactory completed this was uh continue from our hearing on December 5th 2022 we sent out a letter which we did get a response back we did well it is actually the the owners Engineers here this evening but the status of this was at about I don't know I think four o'clock today we did receive an updated as built and cover letter I have not had a chance to

thoroughly review it from what I did see I still don't think that it's done in accordance with the approved plan um but until I've had the chance to review that and Report those findings to you so you fully understand the difference weren't even in your package today I think I think Nina did forward the email but again an hour before the meeting was exhibition time for you to be released

or so I would recommend that you table the matter but if Al wanted to speak at all do you want to come before us all right no there's an old extreme data is trying to get a certificate of compliance plus okay okay all right so can I have a motion a table too table February 2nd we'll go online all right bye bye okay uh let's see next is a question of certificate of compliance

se-24-764 owner Atkins Highland Farms development 2 LLC project location 221 Fieldstone Lane assessment map is u-04-0058 applicable requesting certificate of Appliance sitting all work has been regulated by order conditions this has continued from December 5th meeting and action we sent out an enforcement order correct so so we did for send out an enforcement action we're waiting on the

filing of the new notice of intent so really for the short term there's really nothing that you can do about the matter okay can I have a motion to table this till February 6th so second we'll go bye all right all right all right yes yes all right next is a request of certificate of compliance sc-24-765 owner applicants Highland Farms development two LLC project location 245 pillstone Lane assessments Baptist

u-04-0059 afternoon requesting a certificate of compliance they don't work regular by order conditions this will satisfactory completed this was continued from December 5th 2022 meeting two so again on this day we're waiting keep driving out there to look at this so about three quarters of a lot has been longed and seated there's one portion that for some reason it still has not been completed so it's it's

going to end up sitting you know until they get that result you know but there's nothing there's nothing on this one oh I don't even care if the grass is grown but they should at least put down lone seed and some hay or something yeah at least at least acknowledge what was uh done because we hadn't even sent a letter on this one because the wood was so minor yeah in all practical that won't happen

anytime soon well what ended up happening and I think I explained this to you before what what Bill Kenny did before he left in their site plan review approvals which is through the planning department he made a condition of approval that before any sign off or occupancy it was to take place that they needed to file for a certificate of compliance didn't say they needed to get one

so they needed to file for one so they don't need to have a certificate of compliance normally to get an accuracy permit and live in the house the order condition is still valid for a certain period of time the homeowner for instance could be taking on the responsibility of doing the lowmanency so all of these are being filed to meet a condition of approval that bill put in the site plan reviews yeah so that's why

you're getting me they have to file these in order for somebody to go live in the house they don't have to get them so that all they're doing is meeting the requirement of the condition that Bill's set which so that that's why these are sitting normally you wouldn't be seeing these yet but as you know I'm the first of the video they waited and filed them all at the

very end and they didn't so he wanted to make sure that that didn't happen I think he kind of missed one step the condition may have said receipt of a certificate of the compliance but that's not what I said they said filing for a certificate well I think it's good that we um it is but but like you know it is it will get repetitive until right the homeowner or Bristol Pacific finally you

know finishes the project but they all still have valid orders to complete this work so do we have a motion in the table to uh February 6th okay

let's see next is a requester certificate of compliance se-24-767 Highland Farms development 2 LLC project location 294 films Hillstone Lane census matches 0-04-0061 applicable president certificate of compliances and this was continued from December 5th meeting last action was Senator so this was um one of the later ones this one hasn't been sitting that long this one has a violation so in our normal course of how

we proceed with these a letter didn't go out it doesn't come through speakers yet this is only for TV but I can speak into them all right I'll try to speak a little bit this one is I think issues so I recommend that we do file an enforcement action for this one now because we've got no response yeah I mean I'll make a motion to uh send out a letter could I ask what word what we're

enforcing they've they've altered a wetland beyond what it was permitted for their single family house this is just the mill no no no this is in Highland Farms subdivision oh I'm sorry I just this is number five yeah I'm married under old businesses similar and I got it wrong okay okay yep thank you and yeah just so we're clear you haven't received anything from the homeowners nothing in response to the

original letter no thank you I've heard grumblings people will call and they'll call different people in City Hall you know we understand you sent a letter to this guy or you know asking for some forgiveness and and it is what it is yeah exactly these These are this is a substantial alteration yeah no yes it is so you give them an opportunity to file within 30 days which is what the letter said no

response at all so the next course of action would be the enforcement action and so Paul make a motion for a secondary

next discussion on Bell Rock Road Wetlands violation has continued from meeting so as discussed uh you know they did appear at the December meeting and recommended or at least explain to you what they were doing how they were going to proceed and that they would be filing to be heard at the February meeting you all agreed to that yeah indeed have you heard anything back from the test I know I know they're

working on it yeah same engineer that hasn't responded to item number one so this is a bigger fish though yes and having to get some attention so uh make a motion tip list of February 6th meeting motion table second I I yes all right okay uh discussion on bylaws has been continued from December 5th meeting um I didn't bring anything that I wanted to present Chris did you get a chance to uh

those little things on this yet are I have um I've gone through quite a bit of it I just I don't know how you wanted to get it from me do you want me to email it to you um carved out certain things that I think are achievable for this commission can we so but I would say to send everything to me right okay and then I can compile just so that you're all not

dealing with each other outside okay send everything to me I can compile uh pile of stuff okay send it out for everybody for review and then maybe at that point we discussed that right so send everything in writing to me okay anything this month before I would like to discuss it okay yeah we will okay but before it gets totally formulated nothing's getting formulated you're just

going to send ideas we're going to have we're going to have one Central pile of ideas that you can all review everyone else's ideas okay well I will we'll send some ideas some ideas because I did send the Watertown report Watertown bylaws yeah I've gone over them and I see some areas that are very helpful to us and also some areas we don't want to quite get into sure so um

and I think some of the areas are Improvement are basically procedural with filing deadlines and things like that the day of a meeting you're giving us time so that we can you know so that we can review the materials and things like that so there's some real basic stuff and Dan said low hanging group and I think it's achievable and I think it's doable and I think it's reasonable yeah

even with some of the urban areas and Suburban areas I think they're all just some there's some commonality in those types of things to make the commission's work a little easier make Dan's job a little bit easier and give us some time exactly it gives us a little more Protection Plus this last minute filing is oh yeah like Chris is saying I think that's something that's achievable we can

remove that that's what's wrong because I mean today it's been you know it happens all the time four o'clock on the day of the meeting I mean that doesn't have enough time he's busy as it is okay I just I was just gonna bring up I mean this is going to be lengthy going over the Bible is would you think of a special meeting just bylaws I would agree with that

that's fine we'll give you that yeah that way we don't have to worry about like when I was telling you when uh we started the uh Community preservation committee we had no bylaws no nothing it took us a year to get the Bible done so it's not an easy task because we're trying to get five people to do the right thing so it is uh we'll get everything next month and we'll look it

over and if we have to we'll do uh special meeting just for the Bible ask yeah yeah I mean I I agree with that but I think we should make sure that Dan has a list of things that we send them and then you can narrow it down so that we have something that we can talk about not just come in and waste time but I mean I'm I'm I would support just a

meeting just for that instead of having it on the agenda but we don't have enough time to face things into it I think there's you know I think we need to look at this in certain steps okay because you know phase one yeah and then down the road what what does phase two look like what does phase three look like so we implement this over time I think that's which could require

probably more than one special meeting correct I'm okay with that that's I think that's the best thing that's fine yeah I think it should be the focus of a meeting that's right I agree so we'll forward everything in this next month and then we'll come up with the date for our special meeting you know I I don't want to disagree all the time but it seems to me I think

I agree with you that if we've got it done by next January very good uh you know these this is not an easy task no and we don't want to have too many split votes either um I think a special meeting is we can get into it in depth is a great idea then I think we may end up taking I've been through this with in another organization then taking perhaps a particular issue that

and spending 15 minutes on it at a regular meeting and and keeping going on it because it's not something you want to just let go and then have another special meeting in five months no no we'll always keep the on the uh that's that's against my experience is that you need to add to it because certainly watch two or three and if there are two or three sticky issues they'll need to be disgusted a couple

times yeah well any any policy needs to be reviewed over time so yeah so it was all set for a special meeting yeah okay okay all right on to new business uh first noisy 24-811 owner after this Tyler Lane language uh Slash King Phillips Loft LLC project location 386 shelburn Street assessors mapped as b-17-0015 engineering environmental Consultants uh Associated uh parking grading drainage utility

landscaping and related site improvements unfortunately site work are located within the house wasn't advertised yeah yeah yes thank you okay we I've got the emails yes

whatever you all said John okay usually usually Dan leads off with a with an introduction so introduction that's fine so um the chairman stated this is a project for the Redevelopment of what was left of the King Philip Mill down on Kilburn street so we received the notice of intent with drainage calculations subsequent subsequently we also received your site plan review for the same project we completed our

initial review and sent out our comments to the consultant at the end of the last week with what our concerns were they were somewhat lengthy but not insurmountable by any means probably that we would you know assume would be the case on on a project like this some of them are drawing related calculation related and some dying of eyes and Crossing some teeth so nothing insurmountable by any

means as you've seen in the uh in my initial report I would expect that we would be receiving revised plans we can review those in-house and try and clean up all of these items so that we could have a clean bill of health by the time we get back to you the next time hopefully but we did expect that the applicant would want to come and at least give you initial presentation of

what they're proposing so you can formulate some ideas and of course ask anything that you have to be added additionally to what my review was all right altrachymas with scitec engineering here for King Philip Lofts the applicant this evening the project is on Kilburn Street the resource area that it bought bought borders is a cook Pond we could go to the next slide let's you want to go right to the

presentation plan no we'll go we'll go with this one right now uh I'm gonna I'm gonna assume everyone's familiar with the area how half the mill has been taken down my client bought this parcel from Mr kafari and they are redeveloping the existing Mill structure that is still there on the site if we go to the next one and let's go back to site plan number two okay could have sworn we had a colored one

there is presentation plan at the very end that's what I asked if you wanted now oh I'm sorry I didn't even see it all the way down the end yep there you go this will give the overall presentation a lot a lot easier we will abut Mr kofori subdivision which is just along the Northerly portion of the property our access will be from Kilburn Street we'll have two driveways

and one on either end of the end of the building we'll have a driveway leading around back and then in the rear left hand side as we look at this drawing once Princeton Circle has been constructed there'll be a connecting driveway to Princeton Circle as well this project has already received the variance and a special permit and what we're in front of you for obviously is for the order is for the notice of

intent the project has 100 units 193 bedrooms and also 131 parking spaces we could get into the utility plan but I'll just yes if we could go to number five what we've done is kind of mundane to look at it on at this scale but what we have is we have designed an underground storm water system consisting of would you speak a little louder I'm not getting all of it okay what

we've done is we've we've designed an underground storm water collection system consisting of catch basins drain manholes and we also have storm water treatment units to address the total suspended saw the 80 percent total suspended solids removal same our utilities will come off of Kilburn Street for water for the fire service and also electric where we'll have a transformer in the front

left-hand portion uh corner of the property all in all it's a typical site plan design and we have received as Dan mentioned we've received a number of comments that were combined between I assume I understand Dan and Community utilities that's correct and I was out of the office on Friday so I just saw this today so what we'd be asking for tonight would be to continue this meeting it would

give us time to meet with Dan and Community utilities to iron out some of these questions or all of these questions is what the is what the goal would be there are some that are as Dan mentioned that are pretty straightforward there are those some others that will require discussion however this evening if the board has any additional questions I would prefer to hear them now so we could be prepared for hopefully I

believe the February 6th meeting if I can add gentlemen before you give comment so this project is being filed as a Redevelopment project which means you don't need to meet all of the requirements of the stormwater management guidelines that dep puts out supposed to do at as good a job as you can to extend feasible that's a that's a moving line maximum extent practical you know so we have

asked that they take a different look at this or a hotter look and see if they could make some other improvements so we're going to work through those drainage Kinds of Kinds of components and I'm sure we'll we'll get there that was a concern because I'm looking at diverting you know it used to go to Kilburn street is now no longer going to kill burn street so you know I wanted to

be sure we had the capacity to you know meet the 80 TSS threshold and you know this but the water quality in cook Pond has improved dramatically over the last 30 or four years and I just um wouldn't want to see anything um change is this project going to increase or decrease in previous surface out there decrease by 5 000 square feet and that's one of the questions in the review was provide existing cover and

propose cover so that way you can you can look at drainage isn't I've told you before isn't that that complex when you have a site that has this much cover and you're reducing it technically you should be fairly easily be able to meet the requirements what you want to make sure here is that the water quality issue is being addressed and like Chris stated and this is really a community

utilities concern too is that you know a good portion of this site does run towards Kilburn street now so the drainage is now being entirely diverted away from that which Community utilities likes because you're not over taxing the drainage system but they're greatly increasing the amount of water volume wise and Peak runoff wise of what goes to the pond so those are the things that we'll discuss and we'll have a

healthy yeah I mean to buy anyone twice a year sweeping them to lots and things like that that's that's okay for sand and salt that gets put down but what about oil and different discharges from vehicles and things like that that could end up in the pond that that's my concern as I look at this so um because by the plan there are a number of parkings parking spaces and things like that so I

get the twice a year sweeping and cleaning of the parking lot and hopefully that is consistent but I'm looking for like you know discharged vocs things like that from Vehicles right I think I think you'll find by the time there is a lengthy um storm water management um well I'm not yeah I know that by My Hope Is by the time we come back to you right that that we'll

be able to provide you know a clean bill of health something to to know is if you remember back in the existing conditions drawing there are a number of buildings and sections of this building that are being taken away yeah yeah so I this is a site that you might want to go take a look at and if you do want to take a look at it let me know it is gated off

but I'm sure we can gain access to it because I'd like you to have a good understanding of what is the existing condition and what's happening there now you probably don't want to know but when you're comparing it to what's being proposed you're probably good that that you do see that I think it's a good use of the property and I am aware with some of the things that were going on out there

um just want to be sure it's done yeah correct right and some of those impervious Services actually going to get reduced now that's going on which is a major thing because like Chris was saying I drive by there all the time and the water at cook Pond is a lot better even than a couple years ago and we want to make sure we see it that way yeah so yeah and the fact that you're saving one

of the Mills to me that's that's a benefit as well yeah and the other thing too um when mystical four he bought this land he actually um I don't know if he promised the city but there was some talk that there would be public access to the pond is that still something that do you know that's going to happen or the question is is it going to happen on Mr kafari's piece or

because he still owns the subdivision but that's all going to be all single homes that he's building now from what I understand correct correct yes okay yeah so but there was talk of Public Access or public ease event to have you you haven't no that's uh so that would be a discussion back up a little bit so one of the items that I requested was that they provide a walkway along in between

the parking lot and the pond which just a snapshot of this lot Mr kafari's being able to connect that to something else it's a separate issue wait where are you proposing this path on his property almost on this principle that's all we can control right now is is this property or ask to control so we can ask that a sidewalk be constructed on this parcel at that end of the parking lot between

us between the parking lot and the pond if we ever have the ability to connect that at some other time who knows what happened a number of years ago when the city decided to dispose of this property they never reserved what they had discussed as being the ability to provide a walking path along the edge of this water but it was something that was brought up by the owner no it was never and the person

actually did mention this because it was on I remember reading an article very vividly that he was looking for Public Access that was one I know maybe it wasn't officially it was an it was in a an official thing but he did promise this so I want to make sure that you know in trying to understand if that's still something that's going to happen because I think if you put it out there

and it's a written article and it's a news piece that your intent is to go ahead and construct public access to it this applicant has has no ability to provide that to you no no but I'm just saying that back then that neighborhood group wanted access the city was supposed to write it in when they sold it and they didn't do it so because they left it out it ended up not being enforceable

we should look at that in this project but that doesn't mean that we can't provide a sidewalk here in anticipation of maybe someday being able to connect it if not to the north then maybe at least to the South so we'll have that discussion to see if they're willing to no one would think the residents would want something except as well I think that was that was the thing I think the

residents I mean it's you know it's a nice area and I'm sure it's only going to get better and I think you know it should have some benefit to the community around there into the city right and I'm what I when I refer to Residents I mean the residents are the Lofts I think they were yeah that that was an item in my review all right any other questions for the

board again yeah I was there this afternoon I would like to go through the whole site this has been a source of somewhat there's been a good deal of controversy over this particular site um there have been a number of misstatements I heard a number of them for example at the south end of neighborhood so at a South End neighborhood association meeting about public access my understanding is that one place we

can have Public Access is through that narrow strip of land which is kind of a triangle uh that Conforti still owns I would also like this is our pond I would like to see an area of walkway around this particular site it'll be a benefit to the residents and it might hook up uh I hope that the uh realize that we are not in the position actually it wasn't that the city didn't write it in

it was that the city took it out when the ma the city the Master Plan called for a walkway called for a strip there and then you're right Jim and it was sold right to the uh right to the Shoreline I think is that correct yes yeah and that was wrong yeah it was wrong with the purchaser and it was wrong for the seller it it ignored it will benefit a hundred families it will perhaps

not benefit forty thousand other families um so I think I hope we can look at that as carefully as possible I totally agree with that well Dan you have then you know so we do have that so we can okay yeah I want small item that I saw today through the fence there's a bunch of things on it's towards the uh which side are we on I always have trouble with the directions here and

there's no upriver and down river uh it's the area when you come from kilborn Street uh from Globe corners and that that's that end um there's a bunch of faucets that look to me like faucets to storage tanks I don't know maybe they they're red do you know what I mean it might have been from might be some type of fire apparatus yeah although I don't know what they are they usually

fire if they're red but they looked to me like there might be tanks underneath Oh you mean at the surface you mean just at the surface there were things you turn on there are a number of different water valves in the front of the property a number of different water valves that that service The Mill at different okay they're water whether they're not uh uh combustible fuel no I think the only the only storage tank

here I think was in the rear correct so I I do know that the environmental Consultants working on this property are going through that process now of okay not leaving a tank in there no no no no no okay that right okay those those are water I'm concerned in general because a number of Mills have had large tanks of of oil or fluid or various things in various places uh and I just wanted to

check that because you asked about issues to look at in a month Jim I think it was a great deal of scrutiny um that site well probably the last five years so I think that I agree with you but I think I think those those issues have been resolved yeah and any site remediation that needs to take place is well beyond the the commission's order of conditions if they ever you know choose to Grant

one so there are other permitting authorities that need to review and and go through this process and environmentally that's really the first one and that was really the first step that the applicant took the applicant is well versed in dealing with Mills with the city of Fall River and has been very successful a good thing so that's a good thing any other questions so can I have a motion and a table list

of the February motion of the table hi all right all right all right yes uh thank you thank you thank you let me know when we have some revised plans and we'll we'll have you guys come in some thought when could we meet with either you and or Community utilities before any revisions are made yeah send me an email tomorrow okay let me know what your availability is well okay as soon as possible

yep yep yeah thank you all right next is andrad sc-24-812 owner applicant as Matthew LLC uh project location zero We're Going Back Road Christmas map is z-23-0070 and 0099 filed by NEC on behalf of Matthew Doyle of East Branch doc LLC the review and approve submitted Whitman um so commission members I performed the site walk after reviewing the plan with the applicants consultant previous to

that site what I had additionally asked him for some um data sheets throughout the entire Wetland area we can't Supply before we actually walked out so I walked it by myself first had some questions about an area that I felt that the applicant had missed or the consultant had missed with flagging so we walked the site last Thursday or Friday the consultant agrees he's reflagged this area that that was

missed it's over behind the detention Pond that was built as part of the Innovation Way project but it's fairly substantial so they've asked that the matter be tabled so that they could have the new line surveyed put on a plan and submit it back to us the remainder of the site this this site has been flagged multiple times it's fairly consistent with what the previous vlogging was this

sits east of the bottom of the landfill just north of Airport Road maybe 800 000 feet of airport road but it's a big piece of land probably yeah I don't know maybe 40-ish acres plus or minus the two different parcels so it was that it was I'd like to say that I took credit for something groundbreaking but I didn't this welding area showed up on previous filings and it was just something that was that was

missed by the applicant so okay we did walk it and they have added it and we assumed to get revised plans in soon board have any questions uh can I have a motion table February 8th which would be February 6th motion table Sarah you have any questions did you just listen hi hi hi yes uh okay

next there's a request for certificate in compliance se-24-754 owner applicant is James Cameron of rjk partnership Inc project location is Augusta Street census map is 1-26-0012 filed by Prime engineering on behalf of applicable questions certificate of compliance so commission members you'll see on the request for the certificate of compliance no work that ever been started on the project and uncompleted

so they're not asking for a certificate of compliance that the work was done it's that the work was not done and so then the box that they checked means the permit will be null and void moving forward so that's that's all they're asking for at this point so I don't have a copy of it in front of me but if you look at the box that they check just make sure that you there

so you see the above reference order of conditions has lapsed and is therefore no longer valid the work regulated was never started okay so we'd be approving this COC in order to null this is that yeah yeah all right I'll make I'll make a motion to uh approve COC can I have a second second hi hi hi yes just so that you know what would happen is this would show up against the title of

the land forever until this gets resolved and recorded at the registry so if they wanted to sell it refinance do anything just like any permit that you guys issue in order to conditions and enforcement action if it's not closed out legally that will show open-ended and that would stop any transaction from happening okay all righty moving on uh discussion on sc-24-738 101 Hayfield Lane last action

taken was we sent out a cease and desist letter so I spoke with the owner multiple times as a little bit of a language barrier but we've kind of gotten through it I did speak with his consultant who was putting together a revised notice of intent with somebody that built a patio it's the original phase of Highland Farms did some patio work behind his house and probably push the limit a little bit

too much so I would say table it give them 30 days to put the new filing in if not then we can issue a formal enforcement so keep the enforcement order still intact and well there is no enforcement afterwards we sent out a letter telling them to stop the work and to file all right so you're giving them the the time to file okay but again at some point in time it's up for you to

decide has that time been extended too long and then you can send out anything how long has it been extended at this point they just got them um at the letter just prior to the last meeting so it's been just a little bit over 30 days but again by the time by the time someone hires a consultant or calls around gets I mean it takes two three months yeah

all right so can I have a motion table list of February 6th second one hi hi hi yes uh okay uh let's see we have a receipt of correspondence from National Grid yearly operational plan can I have a motion to put on file motion to file and put on five

okay can I have a motion for approval of the minutes from December 5th meeting so moved second okay all right hi hi yes all right uh no citizen input okay can I have a motion to adjourn motion to adjourn second and we'll go away all right all right all right yes thank you guys very much thank you