4.8.2026 Planning Board

All right. I'd like to uh welcome everybody to the April 8th, 2026 meeting of the Fall River Planning Board. Pursuant to the open meeting but uh law, any person may make an audio or video recording of this public meeting or may transmit the meeting the meeting through any media. Attendees are therefore advised that such recordings or transmissions are being made whether perceived or imperceived by those

present and are deemed acknowledged and permissible. The city charter section section 9-18 mandates that all municipal me member bodies develop and adopt rules or policy for public comment. We have adopted such a policy which in short provides for citizen input on planning board specific matters at the end of the meeting. There's a signup sheet that's located in the back of the room. We'll do a roll call.

I got Craig Salvador in the back for government TV. We've got Dan Aguar, the city engineer.

I've got Chris Lec, the assistant planner. And today we have with us Felicia Parker, uh, planning clerk. Roll call. Gloria, present.

Beth, present.

Mario absent. Mike present.

Farac present as well.

First on the agenda, we on the new business, we have uh roadway reconstruction spring section 66-185, city ordinance considering the roadway reconstruction plan and profile of Spring Street. Danny, I would just let him give a presentation. If if you're going to come up, gentlemen, just um state your name and address for the record, please.

Good evening, Mr. Chairman, members of the board. Uh, Mr. Aguiar, uh, Mr. Lec, for the record, my name is Arthur Frank.

I'm a lawyer with an address of 10, I'm no longer 10 purchase Street, 209 Bedford Street, over Massachusetts. And I represent your applicant, Tividant Investments. Gentlemen, if you want to stand and just put your name into the record please.

Samuel Malcin with seated with me is Mr. Smith, Bill Smith. He's the engineer for the project. Uh Mr. Aguier was kind enough to give me his uh comments of things that he's going to need to see to better inform this board. Uh so it' be my suggestion that we at least have Mr.

Smith give an overview of the project.

We've already gone through the list as far as who's going to provide what uh in a timely fashion before your next meeting so you have time to look at it.

And I understand uh there's also you're waiting for um comments from Department of Community Utilities. So with that, Mr. Chairman, I turn it over to Mr.

Smith so he can explain to you what they're trying to do out there in the old Stafford Heights.

Good good evening. Um Bill Smith's uh civil engineering concepts 34A Main Street in Little Compton, Rhode Island.

Um, basically, uh, our clients, Turan Investment, own several lots located on Spring Street, um, which is part of the old Stafford Heights subdivision. The Spring Street uh goes through Fall River goes from Crandle Road in Tiverton down Bold Lane uh in Tiverton turn that portion turns into Fall River u and then Spring Street comes off of that heads in the northerly direction or a ways in

Fall River then turns back into Tibetan.

So, we're dealing with multiple cities and multiple states. Um, with this project, what we're trying to do is to to develop a couple of lots that are on the Tiveran side um uh but and access it via Spring Street coming off of the existing Boldex Lane.

It essentially um there was there's quite a list of waiverss. the the roads are 35 ft wide in the east west direction and 30 ft wide in the north south direction. So um you know it it it's impossible for us to be able to give you the the the crier required 30 foot um pavement width. So there's a substantial list of um of waiverss that we're asking for and I think that we we

can go through that when we get the uh revised information that Dan had requested. uh unless you prefer for me to do that. Now, uh essentially in a nutshell, that's that's what we're doing. We're dealing with we've gone to the town of Tiveran. We've met with them. We're in the process of trying to get their approval on the Tibetan roads.

Um and we're also have to to satisfy Fall River as well.

Access would be through through us.

I'm sorry.

Access to that would be through us.

That's correct. Yes.

My utilities and such. So there there are utilities that go down Balduk's Lane and we would just tap off of that o overhead electric. Uh um there's no gas, there's no water. It'll be on-site septic systems and wells. So we don't have those utilities that we have to uh contend with.

But that timid would have to deal with that because the tividan lots that are being developed. So between Tividan and the Rhode Island DEM, we'd have to satisfy them. Okay. We're not there's no there's no lots that they own presently that are in Fall River, right? It's just the access to them.

Correct.

Correct.

Anything else?

That's in a nutshell. That's that's kind of explain.

You want to comment or you want to just so that again that you understand Buck Lane originates off of Stafford Road River comes through a section I mean sorry Tivan comes through a section of Fall River and then back into Tibetan again.

So Mr. Smith's correct that adjacent to this section of Spring Street are a bunch of parcels of land that owned by the city of Fall River in the Fall River end of it. And then once you get passed over to the Tivven line, Mr. Baldock's families owned a bunch of these properties for for a period of time. So the existing right ofways come from a very old subdivision plans Stafford um Stafford Heights dating back to

the date on this one. I think it was around 1902.

It's old. I know.

Yeah, that sounds about right.

So, it's plan 220 2255.

Well, it was recorded in in 1960, but I think the plan was prepared well in advance of that, but this was the only actual plan that I could find and it definitely looks like it's older than 1960. So, um so there's a couple of eyes to do teas to cross. generally um there is only so much that you can build in this area. Um I'm of the mindset that chains can only be as strong as their

weakest links. So the streets that we're coming off of, the streets that are ultimately going to connect to this can only be so big.

Um one of the comments that I had asked was the existing Bullduck Lane that this is coming off of, what is what is the condition of that street for this section because it is pretty well defined and constructed for a good portion through the pivot portion. Then there's there's an area that it almost kind of looks like a driveway, a common driveway and in the end is out of the

right of way as well. One of the comments is that we're going to need to get some information on what does existing bullduck look like the width line grade um to see if there are any improvements to that section of the Fall River right away. Um as well um I'll just go through you should have copies of my letter.

Um, with these types of projects, we always ask the question of, and again, this is a dotting eyes, crossing of tees, making sure that it's submitted part of the file on the plans, appropriate documentation that provides the legal ability and right to construct Spring Street is contemplated. So, normally anyone who owns real estate on a subdivision plan that shows right of ways has rights to build the right of

ways. Ownership is something else. Most normally it's to the center line of the way, but being able to construct the streets for what streets are used for and to add utilities is usually a right.

So, we just need to make a document and get that into the file for that. Um, one of the larger concerns we had was with regards to drainage. We had asked for some drainage calculations uh and have not received any. this property, the way that the grade runs, all of the drainage would ultimately flow into the city of Fall River, even the even the Tividan land. So, the engineer has has proposed

the installation of some infiltration catch basins at periodic locations through through the the portion of Spring Street. Uh we would just need to see some calculations of the soil conditions, the sizing of these, what storm um can they accommodate. So like in your regulations there's section 208 or what it was that deals with the sizing requirements and drainage requirements uh for roadways. So we'll

just have to make sure that we can comply with those. Um that would be items two and three. There are and and believe me this is extremely difficult to deal with. It it took me two hours today to get through it and to be able to to clarify because I wanted to make sure that a proper button notification was done. There are a number of parcels owned by the city that were required

over multiple dates. Uh so starting with our GIS website, we we find a bunch of assessors references um on their maps that have been left off of this plan um because you can't just look at the piece directly adjacent. They're actually merged into larger parcels. So I have some information to give them tonight that I was able to get out of the assessor's office. Thank god they're all

owned by the city of Faller, so there's no issues with notifications, we would have just got another reference on it.

So, we don't have an issue with any of that information. So, I think of that as just getting that information on the plan as well. Existing condition of Bold's Lane. I did have a question about there seems to be a bunch of work that's already been done out in the Florida. I I don't know exactly where it falls. It appears like it's close to where the Spring Street rideway would be through

aerial photography. We get two photographs a year. So, so we're fairly up to date with when work has been done.

Within the last year, there's been some clearing, some placing of gravel, maybe some ledge removal up one end of what it looks like. So, we'll have to get that shown and we have concern about that work being done without erosion control and without any permitting uh to take place. And then there is an extensive list of waiverss. None that are earthshattering. They're all something

like in this type of an area is what you would normally see. There are no existing sidewalks, things like that.

There is no uh pavement widths, rightway widths. Uh so we'll need to get through those line item by line item. I wanted to make sure we could accommodate the drainage calculations and drainage design first in case you don't need a waiver of that section of the of the bylaw as well under the rules and regulations, but so we can work our way through that. And then lastly, we're still waiting for comments from

community utilities. Should only be drainage related. uh they are the overseer of of drainage and storm water as as one of their utilities. So once we receive that, I think we can coordinate and get some of these things knocked off.

How how close are you with TIV and uh I think we've got one more meeting with them.

Okay.

Mr. Agu, as far as the um point number six, it's my understanding that that's work that was done in Tivet. Would you want the engineer to verify the location of that work? Would that satisfy you?

I'll give you the aerial photographs that that I'm looking at. Um, it it's right off of the existing bowled up driveway which is in Fall River. So, it appears to me that it's work being done in Fall River. Um, I'll give you the photographs that I have. So, yes, we would like would like that addressed.

And so, you can have you can have this photo.

So this is Balduk, right?

Here's where the driveway splits, right?

Mr. Baldock's house. I think that is whether that's Valden, but there's clearly been a bunch of work in here that coincidentally looks like it falls in in the right way. Thank you. So if we can just deal with that. So in general, that's all I have at this point in time. Hopefully we can get the the drainage stuff resolved. Um they may be sized perfectly fine but we've got to check separation of ground water with

the bottom of the things and make sure that the calculations provided. I want to say it's 25 years storm bet that that section of the ordinance requires.

Any other questions from the board members?

I have a few questions.

I'll do you want to go first?

You go first.

Um I'm just so if I read this correctly, they want to not do the underground utilities but the above ground. Is that correct?

Well, on the plan section, it's labeled proposed underground electric cable and tel town and they show that extending from they're extending one pole off of the existing pole and then from that point going underground. That's what the plan shows.

Those are the waivers under B7, right? So that those the waiverss we're going to we're going to discuss in in great depth this board at the next meeting. at the next meeting. That's my recommendation is is that you table the matter to be able to resolve the outstanding issues. Okay?

And then I'll I can respond to each one or I'll give you a report.

I think I put that in my letter that once once we get the additional information, then I'll give you a a report and review of my recommendations on the waiverss or not.

So, since you asked, um I I'm concerned about no lighting and the fact that it's above ground because I'm glad I would do development in that area, but we're going to do it. I understand the drainage being an issue, but I would recommend underground utilities and having lighting, especially since it's more narrow than than than um the uh the requirements. What are your thoughts, Mike?

Uh yeah, I just had a few questions. I I see that on this plan, we're having three proposed um homes in here. And are there any future um plans for development passes after the the hammerhead here or anything of that nature? There could be certainly.

All right. So, um, has any of that been vetted through? Only reason I say that is that if we already have storm water coming on from these new developments, can you imagine having 10 more developments on the site or whatever it might be? You know, how are we going to address that? And then that that then it comes into the the uh question of lighting uh um emergency access vehicular whatever it might be. and who

would be responding to this? It's Tiveran, so you would assume it'd be Tiveran, but they have to pass through Fall River. So, those are the things that I would I would um be careful about looking at. Um we're just putting in three. This is a if it's a multi-phase project and you have a vision of what that master plan is, could you let us know what that is?

Okay.

the the applicants do own other lots on the tiverance side. Um and we can we can certainly put something together that shows what what is being planned, how we're trying to do something there.

Yeah. I mean, if this is the first of first phase of many and you've undersized your piping and everything else associated with it and what's needed, then you're going to have, you know, we're going to have issues on our side. So that's that's what I'd like you to to take a look at it. On the Rhode Island side of things, they um they are required to for each house that does go in, they're required

to provide rain gardens, infiltration systems to to account for any increase in the imperous surface. We've we've tried to to to take a stab at this, not having a lot of room for detention basins or anything like that outside of those narrow rideaways with the infiltration systems. We have done some soil testing out there and I'll I'll package that up and present that uh to you so that you can see exactly what

we've done.

Very good.

Okay. Anyone else?

And just so the board knows, every individual waiver will need to be discussed and voted upon. So it's not just a package. So we'll be able to pick and go through each one and and address each one independent.

So, I guess Mike just wants the uh we got the three proposed lots and uh whatever might be proposing in the future.

Yeah, we could prepare a narrative.

Yeah.

You know, we'll sit with the developers and they'll give you their their projection as far as what they'd like to do in that area.

See what comes back on us and what doesn't come back on us if you know once it's moved to the phase second phase.

Originally, we were trying to see if we could get a gravel road in there so it didn't have as much runoff implications, but in order to to to control the runoff and with the limited right of way, we thought it would be better to put the an asphalt system with a burm on it so that we can control it and to direct it to the underground systems.

Was there any contemplation into creating a new rideway through the gold property?

Because I mean technically if you look at the tivid line and if you were to run let's say spring street annex along that property line and keep the development because there is no developable land like you said in Florida currently but that doesn't mean that you could not extend further down onto Bullduck Lane and develop additional lots that Mr. Bullduck owns.

Um, and I think that that's what the concern is. Not only there are additional areas in Fall River that could also be developed.

Correct. To my understanding.

Correct. This this will certainly open up that that door if uh u for anybody that has ownership there. Okay.

Um I I it's difficult to uh abandon Spring Street because the ownership my client doesn't have complete ownership.

You you can leave it there. I'm just saying construct a new a complete right of way right in Tibetan along and because technically that section isn't providing frontage to any lots in Fall River. So correct, you could take the state line, put a 40 foot right away and connect to the Spring Street portion of in Tivetan right along the state line and you could even widen Spring Street.

But again, this goes back to my my originally with a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. So it makes no sense to create a 50ft right ofway here when from Stafford Road is only a 30oot right away. Has there been any discussion with Tibetan about emergency vehicle access down a 30ft ride of way with this limited asphalt width?

So it um it this Bold's Lane has been constructed in its current condition for many years.

The uh I know trash trucks go down there. There's a little turnaround right where Spring Street um joins Bulldock Lane. So that they have been able to get you know the the the trash vehicles down there, emergency vehicles, they have had occasion to do that and uh they have not they've not raised that issue with us uh in the hearing that we had with them.

So in Tidan were they mostly concerned with reviewing and looking at just the proposed construction activity in Tibetan in the Hammerhead? So the 300 foot road and they have and part what their review their their review was basically the whole road. They only have authority over the temped side but they did look at that and there was there was discussion about Balduk's Lane and its condition and and

that sort of thing. So okay.

All right. There's no other questions.

Do I have a motion to There's anybody in the audience. Anybody else in the audience that wants to uh has any comments or do I have a motion to table this till the following meeting?

Motion table.

Second.

Gloria.

Roll call. Gloria.

Yes.

Beth.

Yes.

Michael.

Yes.

And I John for motion as well to table this to the next meeting.

Thank you for gentlemen. have this. So if you go on you go on the GIS website and you turn on this small ass

everyone that you have shown but no ID number you're going to win. Don't worry about this. These are the ID numbers.

They're all owned by city of just put them on the line. Okay.

It's like an act of trust and and and and I I I try to go and for me to get this out of them was is that I think it's the same. I think it's that's probably the original.

Yes.

So, I'm just guessing. You're welcome to if you if it helps you if it doesn't I think it's the same plan. I don't but 1= 192 or is that

Thank you very much.

Have a good night.

Thank you.

All right. Next on the uh the agenda form a application for endorsement of plan believed not to require approval and our plan of land file number 26-1672 owner of the Dale Street Realy Trust the Cadam Trust and Roger J. Lavoy Senior and Karen K. Lavoy. Applicant A. Thomas Joken.

Property location zero comma 10 comma 30 Dale Street. Assessor's map G-03 lots 00008 0014 and 0007.

All right. So the purpose of this plan is to subdivide map D3 lot 8 owned by the Dale Street Realy Trust into two parcels. Parcel A will be combined with map D3 lot 14 shown as 10 Dale Street on this plan and parcel B will be combined with D3 lot 7 shown as 30 Dale Street in this plan. This proposal is subject to a grant uh excuse me a variance granted on

December 18th, 2025 with the condition that the there shall be no further subdivision of any of the affected parcels with the condition that there be no further subdivision.

No further subdivision of any of the parcels.

Um and it is recommended that this plan be awarded endorsement if there are any questions.

You have any questions on this one? This one seemed kind of cut and dry. Michael, I just have a quick question. Are any of these lots um with its proximity to South Pond, I'm assuming these are all um leeching fields, is that what correct? Yeah.

Yeah.

All right.

and the the single family dwelling uh which is lot number 30 um I'm assuming it's going to go through site plan approval if they decide to go forward both houses are built so these are they're just subdividing it based on that so house number 30 which is the one on the water is owned by um the Lavo personally they had acquired this additional parcel that's in between the two houses okay under a trust

The parcel that sat in between the two is what's being subdivided into two pieces now. Each each of the adjacent land owners acquiring some of the land.

Gotcha.

That's all.

Okay. All right. I just wanted to make sure that they weren't going to try.

They were actually not creating lots.

Just making the two existing lots.

Okay. Perfect. I just wanted to check with the uh with the removing water.

Yeah. Yeah. Septic steps in and stuff like that and it proximity to the water.

stuff.

So, you basically acquired the middle piece and divided between the two.

Yep.

Yep. Okay.

Nice piece of land on the water.

Yeah. Do I have a motion to accept?

I make a motion to accept.

Michael second.

Oh, I second.

Felicia, who are you giving a second to?

Gloria.

Call Beth.

Yes.

Gloria.

Yes.

Michael.

Yes.

And I John Ferville. Yes. As well.

Number three. form a application for endorsement of plan believed not to require approval and our plan of land file number 26-1673 owner applicant JV Whipple Residences LLC property location 227-233 Whipple Street assesses map G--07 lots 0034 So this plan um the purpose of this plan is to subdivide map G7 lot 34 into two parcels leaving the existing three family dwelling 227 Ripple Street on parcel one

and the existing three family dwelling 233 Ripple Street on parcel 2 as shown on the plan. The property received a special permit pursuant to 86423B January 15, 2026 with the condition of separation utility site plan review and permanent boundary markers installed on property corners.

It's recommended that this plan also be awarded an endorsement.

Just so that you know the the letter and the request about the utility thing was brought up at the last zoning. This was submitted prior to the previous review.

Um, and it was well received. So, we'll see Thursday. Do we have any on next Thursday any 423 visa? No, I don't know. But the board is aware of it and they were and they were okay, it seemed, with increasing that future requirement for having it done before the subdivision plan.

So, that no problem.

Yeah, that was a this is the one we talked about with, you know, they could say they're going to do it and they don't split up the utilities. Correct.

So you're saying now this is back in front of us.

Has that condition been announced?

This one is not subject to that new request of the zoning board. That this one was already approved to the zoning board, but after our last meeting last Thursday or last month.

Okay.

Um we submitted the letter that was submitted by Chairman Ferrer and they all seem to be on board with making upping their normal condition to require that the work be done ahead of time.

There you go. There you go.

So, do I have You don't ask for.

That's right. All right. That's why we got an attorney here.

Why we have a process here?

Keeping us legal.

Do I have a motion to accept?

Beth second.

A second.

All in favor? Beth?

Yes.

Lauria?

Yes.

Michael?

Yes.

And I, John Ferrero, yes. As well.

Number four.

Form a application for endorsement of plan relieved not to require approval and our plan of land file number 26-1674 owner applicant Broen Properties LLC property location 69 Russell Broen Boulevard Assessor's map J-01 lot 00082.

This plan um it intends to subdivide map J1 82 into three parcels. This property received the variance on December 18th, 2025 to raise the existing single family dwelling shown as 69 Russell Broen Boulevard and establish lots 1, two, and three waving lot area requirements for each newly created lot and frontage for lot three. This uh variance was approved on the conditions of site plan review

and the restriction of any additional units including a use.

Very nice area. I know it well.

It is recommended that this plan be award endorsement.

Any questions from the board?

Michael again this is right up the street from a complex the Dumont complex softball complex.

That's why I'm familiar with it.

There's actually a very old house on there. It's going to be torn down.

Didn't we see this one on?

No, it is right.

Okay.

There's a house like right on in the center lot there.

Yeah.

There's two big driveways coming off the side streets up to it.

If not, do I have a motion?

Make a motion to endorse the paint.

Gloria. Second.

Beth.

All in favor? Beth?

Yes.

Gloria?

Yes.

Michael?

Yes.

And I John Fo. Yes. As well.

Okay. Last form A. Application for endorsement of plan believed not to require approval. ANR plan of land file number 26-1675.

Owner applicant James Palumbo for Palumbo Properties Inc. Property location 1155-1157 Pleasant Street, Cessor's Map K-07, lots 0046.

There's a lot of parcels in this one. U the purpose is to combine several parcels into two lots. We're combining that K7 lots 45 and 46 into one lot as shown as uh lot one to combine maps A7 lot 142 and 70 into lot two as shown on the plant and then reconfigure the lot line um of the nuclear parcels to ultimately be presented as shown here Lot two is mostly parking lot, mostly

asphalt and the other two is combining the existing dwellings.

These are in the BL, so there's no coverage requirements.

So, as Chris stated, there's a number of smaller parcels that through for assessment purposes were merged into one single lot number 46. However, when you read the deed, you will see that there it's actually still comprised of multiple smaller lots. So, when this plan initially came in, it came in as one singular lot creating just one new property boundary subdividing it.

However, that plan would not have dictated or followed what the deed showed. So, we had asked that the surveyor show the interior lot lines and how those are now being mur being removed. And the only one really one line that's being created and that's the very little short distance, sorry, my eyes are bad. Um, is that 19.96 uh that's the dividing line now of these multiple parcels. So all of the existing

dwellings fall on lot one on 15,000 square feet except for the corner unit.

The vacant lot over on um lot two with frontage on pleasant and way has frontage on three different streets. So technically all the lots shown comply with zoning the way that it's showing.

There was no zoning relief required uh for this subdivision.

So the variance had got in 1998.

Yep. it's no longer applicable because well that we I required that they also put that notation on the plant right and because on the original variance that was uh at the time when that lot was created it was restricted that that lot was to be deemed non-buildable um it's not entire lot two it's a portion of what's shown here is lot two so I did require that they put that

notation on the plan that it is subject to the relief and they'll they'll have to deal with whether or not this lot is buildable or not at another time. That's not before this board. This is just area and frontage uh before the planning board. But I did I said we need to acknowledge and have it referenced on that plan that that this parcel of land is still subject to that zoning relief.

Took three three revisions, but we finally got it on the last one.

Any uh questions from the board?

It's a tricky one.

All the properties on it and there were there was no um interaction with uh the adjacent utters especially on K-07.

And which one's 07? Sorry, my eyes.

Uh uh 1141 Pleasant Street.

That that was actually part of this at one point in time. That's when the original variance was granted.

Okay. was cutting that piece out of the piece that's behind it.

Okay. All right. And then what about the upper one? The Columbbo property.

Those were not part of any any variance or zoning over.

It is fairly complicated, but for ANR purposes, it's actually fairly simple, but there are a lot of moving parts on it.

All right. Do I have a motion?

I make a motion. Motion by Michael.

Second by All right. Roll call. Beth, yes.

Gloria, yes.

Michael, yes.

And I, John, vote yes as well.

Number six, discussion regarding the request for recommendation of the waterways license application of Captain Joseph J. Okonnell Company, Inc. So through the chapter 91 process, um I'm sure John's familiar with it. We don't deal with them often, but part of that process is that they have to provide um copies of what chapter 91 is looking at.

What chapter 91 is it's it's the legislation in the law that people can the Commonwealth can grant permission to use the water of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. That's chapter 91. So during that process, public notification of a number of boards and agencies is part of the process. So these normally get sent to you, you place them on file, you have the ability to make comment.

There's really nothing planning wise.

Um, this has received conservation commission approval already. That was required before they need to get to chapter 91. So right now this is it goes to the building department, planning department, uh, tribal this, tribal that, historic this, CCM, everybody, fish and wildlife.

So everybody gets the ability to make a comment before the state issues the permit. Um but this is solely for the construction of floats and docks in the Taton River. No no no landward improvements are shown or proposed as part of this. And what happens is you the the chairman of the planning board, you signed them before, John, just signed that. Yes, we did receive it.

That marina's been there forever.

Yeah.

Yes.

I'm 63. name around. I remember that when I was a kid. There was a guy in front I used to I used to work for.

Is that right?

On a farm, believe it or not. I was like 13. I remember that. That's a few generations.

So, all right. So, uh what do we need a motion to uh just receive place on file and then and then but then you have to sign the acknowledgement that we did receive it and that motion.

I make a motion we uh put that on five and acknowledge we've received it.

Acknowledge receipt. Second.

A second.

Beth.

All right. All in favor? Gloria?

Yes.

Beth.

Yes.

Michael.

Yes.

Can I John? Yes. As well. Approval of the minutes of the meeting. There was only three of us, I believe.

Yeah.

Where is it?

Minutes right there.

Make a motion to approve the minutes.

Okay. Motion by Gloria. Second.

Can only you be you, Beth?

Oh, that's right. Michael wasn't here.

I second.

Okay. All in favor? Gloria?

Yes.

Beth?

Yes.

And I, John, vote yes as well on the minutes of the meeting from the March 11th, 2026 meeting.

Now, since this is info, we don't have any.

Do I have a motion to adjurnn?

Motion to adjurnn.

Motion by uh Beth. Second.

A second.

Second by Michael.

All in favor of Beth.

Yes.

Gloria.

Yes.

Michael.

And John vote. Yes. As well. Good night everyone.

Good night. Thank you very much.