City of Fall River Meetings
Search and subscribe to city meeting topics that impact you
Newsletters
Subscribe
← Back to video
7.28.2026 Fall River City Council - Special Meeting
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
1:09
This former city council meeting will now be called to order.
In
Out
1:13
Madam Clerk, roll call please.
In
Out
1:14
Councilor Cadime.
In
Out
1:15
Here.
In
Out
1:16
Guevara.
In
Out
1:16
Here.
In
Out
1:17
Canuel?
In
Out
1:17
Here.
In
Out
1:18
Dion?
In
Out
1:18
Here.
In
Out
1:19
Hart?
In
Out
1:20
Here.
In
Out
1:20
Peckham?
In
Out
1:21
Here.
In
Out
1:21
Pereira?
In
Out
1:22
Here.
In
Out
1:22
Raposo?
In
Out
1:23
Here.
In
Out
1:23
President Ponte?
In
Out
1:24
Here.
In
Out
1:24
Pursuant to the open meeting law, any person may make an audio or video recording of this public meeting or may transmit the meeting through any medium.
In
Out
1:30
Attendees are therefore advised that such recordings or transmissions are being made, whether perceived or unperceived by those present, and are deemed acknowledged and permissible.
In
Out
1:38
It is 5:30 on the 28th of July.
In
Out
1:42
This meeting has been called to order.
In
Out
1:44
Um, just for everybody's own edification, for the public and those who are here, the City Council chambers, as memoed to the council and the community a couple of other meetings, is closed to the public until August 11th for some work outside of the chambers.
In
Out
1:58
We felt that the ceilings are down, there's some work that is being done internally that needed to have been done, so that is being done.
In
Out
2:06
So we are in the City Council hearing room for this special meeting that has been called.
In
Out
2:10
First item on our agenda this evening is citizens' input.
In
Out
2:13
One person signed up to speak is Colin Dias, 560 Ray Street, and it is regarding the budget.
In
Out
2:20
Oh, actually, we should have— before we do that, this is a, uh, this isn't a full city council meeting, correct?
In
Out
2:25
Yes, it is.
In
Out
2:26
We should actually— if you can go back over there, Mr. Dias.
In
Out
2:29
If everybody in the city council hearing room could please rise for a moment of silent prayer.
In
Out
2:33
I apologize.
In
Out
2:40
Thank you, and a salute to the flag.
In
Out
2:42
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
In
Out
2:53
Sorry about that, we're a little out of our element here, uh, so I'll reintroduce the item.
In
Out
2:57
It is citizens input, Mr. Dias, 560 Ray Street, and the subject matter is budget.
In
Out
3:03
3 minutes.
In
Out
3:08
Thank you, Council President, members of the City Council.
In
Out
3:11
I'm here today to speak in support of the transportation budget as approved by the School Committee.
In
Out
3:19
This number was fully vetted by the School Committee, and it's important— I believe it's important that we do not have to come back before the City Council for money if need be.
In
Out
3:32
I do not— and again, I do not trust that this administration would even honor that request if we even had to come back.
In
Out
3:37
I think it's important to— when you're— I guess for hypothetical sense, when you buy a house, you should have enough money to pay for the mortgage.
In
Out
3:47
The mayor recently told us at Wednesday's school committee meeting, last Wednesday, that he would fully fund the $17 million and that a deal was reached tonight to fund— fully fund the budget.
In
Out
4:01
That's what he said.
In
Out
4:03
2 days later, the mayor changed his mind.
In
Out
4:06
My question is, what changed?
In
Out
4:09
Was it the investment income projections?
In
Out
4:12
Was it something else?
In
Out
4:14
I don't know, but I am frustrated as one member of the community today, and I, and I wish to state state this on the record and mark my words.
In
Out
4:24
The mayor is currently bullying our superintendent, who is behind us, to agree to the number that is before you tonight, which is not the number the school committee agreed to.
In
Out
4:35
The city council has a duty to pass a fully funded budget, a fully balanced budget.
In
Out
4:42
Please deny the mayor's budget that he sends down and demand that he sends down a fully funded budget for transportation.
In
Out
4:50
There should be no question, no politics when it comes to the students of our city, and we deserve a fully funded transportation budget for the kids of our city.
In
Out
5:00
Thank you.
In
Out
5:00
Thank you, Mr. Diaz.
In
Out
5:01
Next item on, uh, Council Vice President Dionne.
In
Out
5:06
Yeah, I'd only like to make a couple of comments, and I guess the first one is, um, Whether this, whether this would be funded, whether this would be funded down the road if need be is not in the mayor's purview.
In
Out
5:22
It's up to the council to vote to fund it or to give extra money, not, not the, not the, not the administration.
In
Out
5:30
The purse strings are here.
In
Out
5:32
And, um, and secondly, yes, we're obligated to pass a balanced budget.
In
Out
5:41
And I'm not saying— and, and I'm not making these comments saying whether I agree or don't agree with the transportation issue, just basic facts.
In
Out
5:49
Um, and then the other thing is, yes, we're responsible.
In
Out
5:53
We have to pass a balanced budget, correct?
In
Out
5:55
But just like anything else in this budget, we cut the indirects in, in a stabilization account by over $1 million.
In
Out
6:04
Why?
In
Out
6:04
Because we were able to.
In
Out
6:06
Because just because it was in the budget didn't mean we had to say yes, I guess is my point.
In
Out
6:11
So yes, we have to balance— make sure it's balanced, but we don't have to agree to everything that's in it.
In
Out
6:17
So I just want to make those 2 points just for some clarification.
In
Out
6:22
Thank you.
In
Out
6:22
You yield?
In
Out
6:23
Yes.
In
Out
6:23
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
6:24
I just have something to add because I get pretty frustrated when people make a statement that I sit here and wonder, is that true, is it not?
In
Out
6:34
But Mr. Diaz, you just made a comment that the mayor is bullying the superintendent.
In
Out
6:39
The superintendent is here, and if she is being bullied by the mayor, I think she should tell us that.
In
Out
6:47
That— I mean, you made that statement.
In
Out
6:51
If she's being bullied, I want her to tell us.
In
Out
6:54
Are you being bullied?
In
Out
6:56
You know, I, I can't speak for the superintendent.
In
Out
7:00
But you did.
In
Out
7:01
You just said she was being bullied.
In
Out
7:03
I fully stand behind my comments, so I'll leave it at that.
In
Out
7:07
Well, you can say you feel possibly that way, but to make a statement that— has she had a conversation with you about being bullied?
In
Out
7:14
I was informed by whistleblowers.
In
Out
7:17
Well, you can't listen to all whistleblowers, you know.
In
Out
7:22
With that, I yield.
In
Out
7:23
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
7:23
Councilor Kadeem.
In
Out
7:25
Thank you.
In
Out
7:26
Sorry, I'm like, um, I just want to clarify one statement.
In
Out
7:31
I, I do agree with my colleague.
In
Out
7:33
The only, the only issue that I have is, is that we can only— while we control the purse strings, we can only act on items that come down before us by the mayor.
In
Out
7:40
So if the mayor doesn't submit some type of an order for us to make a transfer or an appropriation order, we can't take any action.
In
Out
7:47
So I think that's where Mr. Diaz was going, but I don't disagree.
In
Out
7:50
I think at least the conversations I've had, if there are any transfers that need to be had or any appropriations that the mayor has committed to making those, so I would, I would hope that he would uphold his, his word and his commitments, come back down.
In
Out
8:03
But I mean, that's for a conversation, uh, in one of our next discussions to really kind of talk about where we stand in terms of a balanced budget without a yield.
In
Out
8:11
Thank you.
In
Out
8:11
Councilor Camara.
In
Out
8:12
Yeah, I just want to pick up on what Councilman Seat 7 was talking about.
In
Out
8:15
Mr. Diaz, do you have any documentation or proof you can leave with this body today to back up the statements you just made about the bullying?
In
Out
8:21
I was informed by whistleblowers.
In
Out
8:24
I trust the statements that will be made.
In
Out
8:26
So the answer is no, and I stand by my comments.
In
Out
8:28
So the answer is no, you don't have any documentation or facts you can give us?
In
Out
8:32
Is there documentation that the mayor bullied people?
In
Out
8:35
I mean, I, I don't understand the question.
In
Out
8:37
Very simple.
In
Out
8:37
People want to say— people make comments.
In
Out
8:39
Let me just finish with the questions.
In
Out
8:40
You don't understand it.
In
Out
8:41
People make comments and usually back it up with facts, documentation to prove that their comments are true.
In
Out
8:45
That's not that difficult to understand, is it?
In
Out
8:49
My advice as a citizen and as someone who watches council meetings and someone who understands what members of the council support the mayor more blindly than other members support the administration, I would advise you to maybe take the blinders off and understand that there's many instances in the community where there's been actions that aren't appropriate.
In
Out
9:13
I stand by my comments.
In
Out
9:14
I believe the whistleblowers that have come before me.
In
Out
9:17
And I just want to make the statement because I've seen the action.
In
Out
9:21
I've seen the mayor make comments that he's fully funding the budget.
In
Out
9:25
2 days later, it's not fully funded.
In
Out
9:28
I, I think that's where— I think you should be asking the mayor.
In
Out
9:31
So I just want to ask you several questions.
In
Out
9:34
You answer the question.
In
Out
9:35
You don't have any documentation to back up the comments that you're making.
In
Out
9:38
You're just listening to whistleblowers, which is okay if that's where you want to roll.
In
Out
9:41
That's fine.
In
Out
9:42
It's up to you.
In
Out
9:42
I don't go that way.
In
Out
9:44
When I make a comment, I have documentation to back up what I'm saying so people can actually see it and know what— and want to judge for themselves what's true or not.
In
Out
9:51
So my advice, you're the one that brought it up, not me, a citizen, would be to ask the mayor what changed within 2 days, how he promised the school committee he would fund it at $17 million and we're here today with a budget that's not $17 million.
In
Out
10:07
I just want to know what happened within the last 2 days.
In
Out
10:09
That's totally different from what I'm talking about.
In
Out
10:11
I'm talking about the bullying comment.
In
Out
10:12
Just want documentation on the bullying comment that you made, not about what what happened and what changed, what happened, what he promised, what he didn't promise.
In
Out
10:18
Let's not try to change the subject.
In
Out
10:19
It's very simple.
In
Out
10:20
All I want to know is if you have documentation or anything else you can leave with this body to prove your comments about the bullying.
In
Out
10:26
That's all.
In
Out
10:26
Yeah, I think I answered the question.
In
Out
10:28
I don't have to do the work to give you— Thank you.
In
Out
10:30
Thank you.
In
Out
10:31
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
10:32
Any further?
In
Out
10:33
Thank you, Mr. Diaz.
In
Out
10:34
That will conclude citizens' input.
In
Out
10:35
Priority matters before this council: the mayor and an order and a memorandum of agreement.
In
Out
10:40
Between Mayor Paul Coogan and the Fall River City Council regarding outside legal counsel.
In
Out
10:45
Motion to adopt.
In
Out
10:46
Motion to adopt has been made by Councilor Ferreira, seconded by Councilor Raposo.
In
Out
10:50
Is there discussion on this item, on the adoption of the memorandum of agreement between the mayor and the city council?
In
Out
10:57
Council Vice President Dionne.
In
Out
10:58
Yeah, I just— I would just like to state that a lot of time and effort did go into this.
In
Out
11:03
Um, I think the goal was to be a bridge between the City Council and the administration, to just to try to bring people to the table.
In
Out
11:12
How people vote, whether they agree with it, don't agree with it, is fine.
In
Out
11:17
People don't have to agree with it.
In
Out
11:19
Um, was there compromise that went in?
In
Out
11:22
Absolutely.
In
Out
11:23
You have to have compromise, um, in, in many situations.
In
Out
11:28
And whatever this— and it's— oh, and I want to be very clear It was always about the body.
In
Out
11:35
It was never about the President and myself.
In
Out
11:38
We made it clear from day one there was no agreement that could be signed by us.
In
Out
11:44
There was no agreement that could be rock solid.
In
Out
11:46
We could not bind this council to anything.
In
Out
11:49
And at every meeting we had, I would tell the administration, before anything else can happen, before we can move forward, everything we've discussed, and any MOAs that come out of these meetings have to go to the council, to the body, because this MOA and moving forward is about the body.
In
Out
12:10
It's not about me.
In
Out
12:11
It's not about the council president.
In
Out
12:13
So whatever this body votes today is the direction we will move in.
In
Out
12:19
And with that, I yield.
In
Out
12:20
Thank you.
In
Out
12:21
Anything for Councilor, uh, Councilor Lateen?
In
Out
12:23
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
12:24
I— so I just want to kind of echo my I want to echo the sentiments of Vice President, and I want to thank the President and Vice President for their due diligence on this work.
In
Out
12:31
I know there was a lot of meetings that took place to try to get to the place we're at.
In
Out
12:36
I can tell you that especially for the Vice President, I was involved in the last meeting.
In
Out
12:41
She did reach out to me to try to bridge the discussion between myself and Corporation Counsel, and I will say it was a productive meeting.
In
Out
12:48
It was a very long meeting.
In
Out
12:51
In terms of what was before us in this MOA.
In
Out
12:56
But overall, when we start looking at the MOA, I think it's a great compromise because that's what it was.
In
Out
13:00
It was a compromise.
In
Out
13:01
And when we start talking about the body as the City Council, the lens that we looked at this from was not this current administration or this current council, but it was future administrations and future councils and making sure that there was some safety nets and protections for both sides.
In
Out
13:16
Number one, not to circumvent the administration or Corporation Council, but to give Again, some reassurance to the council, if there is a disagreement, we have the authority to seek a second legal opinion.
In
Out
13:28
Nothing that would be binding, but to really just get a second set of eyes on any type of legal opinion that was sent down or any opinions that have been submitted even without our request so that we can kind of get some reassurance on where it stands.
In
Out
13:44
So overall, I want to— again, want to thank Council President, especially Council Dionne, who really kind of, um, you know, ushered this through.
In
Out
13:52
Uh, Corporation Council, I think he did a phenomenal job in terms of, uh, giving in in certain areas as well, uh, as well as the City Council.
In
Out
13:59
And I think overall this is an MOU that will benefit this council, future councils, and the administration.
In
Out
14:06
That being said, um, I can tell you that I had to commit to, uh, Corporation Council that there was an ordinance that was submitted with regards to legal counsel.
In
Out
14:16
So I'll be filing a resolution to have that removed from ordinance because it was in this MOU.
In
Out
14:21
Part of my agreement was that we would not have an ordinance and that this MOU would, would pretty much be the Bible in terms of where we were going with regards to getting outside legal counsel and the process that it would take place.
In
Out
14:35
So I'll submit a resolution to, to have that removed and go through the process, and hopefully we'll have the support of the council.
In
Out
14:41
But overall, I think this, this MOU is, is a great starting point.
In
Out
14:45
And then obviously the council will have to, you know, come up with a policy in terms of, you know, how we go about entertaining getting outside legal, when we can request second legal opinions, things of that nature.
In
Out
14:57
But again, kudos to the administration and, and to council leadership for really trying to kind of usher this through and bridge the gaps between our disagreements and differences that we had.
In
Out
15:07
So with that, I yield.
In
Out
15:08
Thank you.
In
Out
15:08
Councilor Camara.
In
Out
15:10
Yeah, just curious, maybe through the chair to my colleague in C1, does that mean that there will never be an ordinance, or can any other council create an ordinance that will put into effect what you had in that ordinance?
In
Out
15:21
What if 5 or 6 years from now the council is different and someone says we should have an ordinance to put in certain things in place?
In
Out
15:28
Will that null and void this agreement, or Yeah, I don't know the fact you're going to get rid of your ordinance that you hadn't written out, but there's nothing to prohibit future councilors from saying, no, we really need an ordinance to address— no, no.
In
Out
15:41
And that— so short answer is no, it doesn't prohibit future councilors from submitting an ordinance.
In
Out
15:46
It's whether or not, uh, Corporation Counsel will agree that it's a legal, uh, ordinance, right?
In
Out
15:53
Like something that could be legally challenged and upheld.
In
Out
15:56
You know, one thing we, we did walk away saying that we're not foregoing the fact that we feel that we have the authority for outside legal, and he's also not foregoing his idea that he has to approve outside legal.
In
Out
16:06
So I think it's just we're not setting any precedent moving forward, but it was just an agreement from my standpoint to have that removed.
In
Out
16:13
So if future councilors want to take up that fight and submit an ordinance, then they have the— they have the opportunity to do that.
In
Out
16:19
All right, just curious.
In
Out
16:20
Thank you.
In
Out
16:20
Without any further discussion on this, There's a motion to adopt, and I want to again thank you to Madam Vice President.
In
Out
16:27
It's working with you and Corporation Counsel as well as the interim city administrator and the mayor for getting us all in a room to to work through these intricacies so that we can move the dial forward here.
In
Out
16:40
So again, thank you for everybody's efforts on that.
In
Out
16:42
I echo everybody's comments.
In
Out
16:44
Motion to adopt has been made and seconded.
In
Out
16:46
Hearing no further discussion, roll call, Madam.
In
Out
16:48
Madam Clerk.
In
Out
16:49
Councilors Kadim?
In
Out
16:50
Yes.
In
Out
16:51
Kamara?
In
Out
16:52
Yes.
In
Out
16:53
Canuel?
In
Out
16:53
Yes.
In
Out
16:55
Dion?
In
Out
16:55
Yes.
In
Out
16:56
Hart?
In
Out
16:57
Yes.
In
Out
16:58
Peckham?
In
Out
16:58
No.
In
Out
17:00
Pereira?
In
Out
17:00
Yes.
In
Out
17:01
Raposo?
In
Out
17:02
Yes.
In
Out
17:02
President Ponte?
In
Out
17:04
Yes.
In
Out
17:04
Motion carries 8 yeas, 1 nay.
In
Out
17:06
Madam Clerk, item 3 is a communication from the mayor and the 3rd revised proposed fiscal year 2022-23 budget.
In
Out
17:14
2027 Municipal Budget General Fund Appropriation Order.
In
Out
17:19
Discussion?
In
Out
17:20
Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
17:21
All right, this is what I have to say about the whole issue with this budget.
In
Out
17:28
My understanding was leadership had a meeting with the mayor to talk about the budget.
In
Out
17:34
School Department finance team met with the mayor with the city's finance team.
In
Out
17:39
Now, to be perfectly honest with you, I never got a call from anybody in leadership to say, we met with the mayor and this is what we're looking at so far, this is what's happening.
In
Out
17:49
So I'm hearing a lot through the grapevine.
In
Out
17:51
So I'm going to throw the grapevine out, and you people who are all here can tell me what's true, what's not, and where we move from here.
In
Out
17:59
That at a school committee meeting— and I watched that school committee meeting— when they talked about the school transportation And they asked— I want to say it was School Committee Aguiar that said, what is the amount?
In
Out
18:13
And the mayor said it would be $17 million.
In
Out
18:17
Then the Ordinance Committee, we had a meeting here, and our CFO, Mrs. Opke, was here.
In
Out
18:26
What is the amount?
In
Out
18:27
And we weren't really sure.
In
Out
18:29
Then in listening to school department individuals, that they had a meeting and it was thought that because of the fact they're doing the redistricting, we could look at possibly 3 fewer buses and 2 fewer vans, that there would be a decrease in transportation.
In
Out
18:49
So it was talked about to give the school transportation $16,650,000.
In
Out
18:58
Which would leave a balance of $450,000 to meet the $17 million mark.
In
Out
19:05
At that point, I had heard they were looking at the earned interest from our investments, which I believe in the budget had been about $3 million.
In
Out
19:15
But I had, um, Lauren send it to everyone because I tried to call and speak to Miss Oppy, couldn't get in touch with her.
In
Out
19:23
I know she's very busy.
In
Out
19:25
Reached out to Ian Shackney, and Ian did send an email— you all have it— where there was $4 million some odd dollars in earned interest, plus another close to $1,995,000 from OPER investment money.
In
Out
19:41
So the total is over $5 million in earned interest.
In
Out
19:46
Now, I just heard Mr. Kadeem say, I believe that if we do the— and I— not this amount, but if we do the $16.6 million and the school department needs more, we do have money in earned income, and the mayor has agreed that he would supplement the school department if it was needed.
In
Out
20:10
So that's where I'm at.
In
Out
20:12
That's what I'm hearing.
In
Out
20:13
So I'd like to hear if that's something that can be mutually agreed upon by people Or do we take the money now and put the whole 17?
In
Out
20:22
Does it make a difference either way?
In
Out
20:24
Motion to waive the rules.
In
Out
20:24
Motion to waive the rules to invite Ms. Arkey and the school committee superintendents down has been made by Councilor Kadim, seconded by Councilor Hart.
In
Out
20:34
All those in favor?
In
Out
20:35
Aye.
In
Out
20:35
Opposed?
In
Out
20:36
The ayes have it.
In
Out
20:43
Mr. Aldo.
In
Out
20:46
We might need another chair or so, but all right, very good.
In
Out
20:53
If you can, um, beginning with you, Madam Superintendent, introduce yourself for the record, please.
In
Out
21:00
Kathleen Smith, interim superintendent of schools.
In
Out
21:05
Aldo Petronio, CFO for Fall River Public Schools.
In
Out
21:10
Emily Erbke, Director of Finance.
In
Out
21:15
That's okay.
In
Out
21:17
You know, Neil Souza, Interim City Administrator.
In
Out
21:20
All right, Councilor Pereira, you have— so maybe if you can all clarify that for us so that we can then take a vote.
In
Out
21:28
Could I speak first?
In
Out
21:29
Yes, absolutely.
In
Out
21:30
Councilor, first of all, I want to thank you again for having us here, and it really is important for me to go back to, I believe, June 1st, which was the night where we actually defended our budget and it was non-net school spending.
In
Out
21:42
I sat here with Kevin Almeida, our Chief Financial Officer at the time.
In
Out
21:46
I had been in the seat for about 1 month.
In
Out
21:48
I had Deputy Superintendent LeGault, and I also had Ken Pacheco, Director of Transportation.
In
Out
21:54
At that time, the budget had been reduced from what was approved by the full school committee unanimously on the non-net school spending at the time, the $17.1 million.
In
Out
22:05
I think it was on the 16th of April that was done.
In
Out
22:09
We stood by that budget.
In
Out
22:11
We talked about, you know, why that was important to us.
In
Out
22:14
At the time, the thing that was in question, the variable, and we talked very openly about that, was the redistricting.
In
Out
22:21
And it was important to note that with the redistricting, there are a lot of moving pieces here.
In
Out
22:25
We are— and I'm going to be careful to use the word hopeful— But we are trying to be fiscally responsible in not only the redistricting, and this is really step one with the redistricting, but to see if there was going to be cost savings.
In
Out
22:38
After that meeting was over, there was a lot of discussion.
In
Out
22:41
I want you to know that the very next day I picked up the telephone and I called Council President Ponte.
In
Out
22:48
I first of all thanked him for the questioning and the respect shown to our team that evening.
In
Out
22:53
I think there was a lot of dialogue from all of you.
In
Out
22:55
I went through my notes just the other day.
In
Out
22:57
And at the time, we committed to working together, knowing of the variables for this year, whether you call it a task force or whatever it was, that we would sit and review on a very regular basis.
In
Out
23:09
There's a lot to review, whether you want to look during this coming year not only at the redistricting— do you want to look at walk zones?
In
Out
23:16
You basically— the state sets an amount, you actually allow for a lesser amount, you transport more of your students for safety reasons, you know, certainly a good reason to do that.
In
Out
23:28
Looking at again the buses, the vans, are there savings?
In
Out
23:32
So that is where we landed at the time.
In
Out
23:34
I'm now coming before you this evening after some discussion very recently.
In
Out
23:39
There has not been— you know, Councilor, you asked about discussion.
In
Out
23:43
I have had some discussion recently, the past couple of days, with the mayor and his team about the $450,000.
In
Out
23:50
So if you look at that, it's actually come down.
In
Out
23:52
To a deficit from what we requested to $450,000.
In
Out
23:56
I cannot sit here and commit absolutely that we would have that savings, but what I can continue to commit to work with the mayor and his team, you know, to work with the council president and your team, that we would come on a regular basis.
In
Out
24:09
We're right now still registering students.
In
Out
24:12
We're not sure about the Green School, which has a dual language program, although we've redistricted There are some programs that are in movement right now.
In
Out
24:20
There are days, I'm told, and this is not unusual for a large urban district, where you register close to 100 students during a day.
In
Out
24:28
I think right now with our political atmosphere, there are, you know, we're really questioning, you know, are all of the students going to register?
In
Out
24:36
We're concerned about that, but those are variables we don't know at this time.
In
Out
24:40
So I guess I'm sitting here this evening, I'll answer any questions I can.
In
Out
24:44
But we are committed to working with all of you to keep you updated as school opens, whether it's monthly, whatever it is, so that we can share with you the savings that we're seeing.
In
Out
24:53
And obviously, sooner than not, if, if there is an opportunity we have where we have to say to you, here are the reasons and we're not seeing the savings, then we would like to be able to count on the mayor and the city council to be able to, you know, fully fund our non-net school savings.
In
Out
25:09
One of the things we spoke about at the ordinance committee, which Councillor Raposa chairs, and he had put in, um, you know, so let's have an ad hoc committee with certain members of the council, certain members of the school committee to keep an eye on that.
In
Out
25:23
So if that's going to happen as well, I think that would be helpful to both sides, and you would know, you'd be able to discuss the transportation issue there.
In
Out
25:33
So are you saying that if we give the $16.6 uh, $650,000, but that you needed more.
In
Out
25:43
Do you have faith that we would be able to give you more at that point, Emily?
In
Out
25:47
Would we be able to give them more?
In
Out
25:49
Yes, I think that we have enough in reserves and enough other variables that we can, you know, constantly do.
In
Out
25:55
We have that situation anytime, right?
In
Out
25:57
There's other things that happen throughout the year that are unforeseen, and we have— we come down for more money as it's needed.
In
Out
26:03
So we're always that ability, and there is a big commitment from our side that we would make sure that we could do that.
In
Out
26:08
Could you do the 17 now?
In
Out
26:11
I think you can.
In
Out
26:13
If you can get it later, you can get it now.
In
Out
26:15
Am I wrong?
In
Out
26:16
It would— sometimes it would require changes and other things that are in flux that we don't know about that could be in flux in a different way that would help, you know, transfer over.
In
Out
26:23
Not if you take it from investments, from the interest in investments.
In
Out
26:26
So we've been talking about investment income.
In
Out
26:28
We did increase it, so this submission now has an increase of, um, it's $5 million.
In
Out
26:34
No, that's the actual— that's— yeah, sorry, it was an interest— it was an increase of $350,000.
In
Out
26:41
Yeah, okay, from what you had put in.
In
Out
26:43
So, so it's up to $2.3— $3.6 million.
In
Out
26:45
It was at $3.25 and it's at $3.6.
In
Out
26:48
So we are losing— you mentioned a million of that $5 million is ARPA, so we won't have that anywhere near that rate next year just because ARPA's got to be fully expended by December, and the fact that we're obviously dwindling down, so we only have 6 months of it and it's a lot lesser of an amount.
In
Out
27:02
So that number is going to continue to drop down.
In
Out
27:05
So looking at our general fund side of things, and then the fact that interest rates have been coming down slowly, luckily, over the last year, they do continue to slowly kind of trickle in that direction.
In
Out
27:16
So to say that we're going to continue to hit that $4 million number, I think it's been a conversation since before I even was in the seat that that's not going to maintain.
In
Out
27:23
And you might not have that.
In
Out
27:24
And I'm not talking about what we're going to do for next year.
In
Out
27:25
I'm talking about right now.
In
Out
27:26
You can't get $450,000 to make them whole at $17 million?
In
Out
27:31
Well, that— you're talking about that investment income being from '26.
In
Out
27:34
I don't care where you get it.
In
Out
27:36
Is there $450,000?
In
Out
27:37
I mean, I look at some of the hirings that have been done.
In
Out
27:40
I look at some of the raises that have been given to certain people within City Hall that if we're tight, I think that some of those raises $15,000, a little too much.
In
Out
27:52
So just my opinion.
In
Out
27:53
So then in that sense, sure, we could do the $450,000 today, but you're talking about pulling something else that's in the budget that, you know, we've been going through, that we've submitted documents from other departments and stuff like that, and we have that zero-based budgeting in there.
In
Out
28:04
So yes, we could do it, but you would probably be changing something else in the budget, and that would be a conversation about what we would be reducing to put that in.
In
Out
28:12
I'm going to yield and let some of my colleagues, uh, have a chance.
In
Out
28:17
I mean, thank you.
In
Out
28:18
If you could— I mean, you're saying you could do it with the $16,650,000 as long as you know that another $450,000 would be available, and you can start out with that.
In
Out
28:30
Do you know through transportation now?
In
Out
28:33
We do not.
In
Out
28:33
How many buses we would have less?
In
Out
28:36
You don't know that?
In
Out
28:37
Well, that is the variable.
In
Out
28:38
You don't know that?
In
Out
28:39
You know, we are looking to see the students that are presently registering, right?
In
Out
28:43
Where right now we have bus routes certainly that are formed, but there will be additions.
In
Out
28:49
You know, there could be some students coming off of the busing.
In
Out
28:52
That's the redistricting question that I can't answer this year.
In
Out
28:55
And hopefully people will come and register their children sooner than later, usually 2 days before, 3 days before, a week before.
In
Out
29:03
Everybody's running in registering children.
In
Out
29:05
Yeah, one day each is very critical to us is the October 1st date.
In
Out
29:09
So that is important to us for funding, for our Chapter 70 funding.
In
Out
29:12
So by October 1st, we make every effort to make sure all your kindergarten students are in, your preschool students are in, you know, students that we have people in out in the district, you know, making sure that people are registered.
In
Out
29:23
And, and I guess I'm speaking from formerly a large urban district.
In
Out
29:27
We make sure that October 1st is critical because that is your funding and it's an 18-month lag.
In
Out
29:32
And I agree that transportation is critical because we do want to make sure that our students can get to school.
In
Out
29:39
But, Councillor, I'm also saying that when I look at that October 1st, I would think by November 1st we would have a very good idea of other savings that we're seeing.
In
Out
29:48
Um, I wouldn't be too quick, I mean, but we'd be reporting to our so-called task force or ad hoc committee and have that added.
In
Out
29:54
That's, that's a good thing to have.
In
Out
29:55
I'm going to yield to give my colleagues— thank you.
In
Out
29:58
Before I acknowledge our other councillors Just as a point of clarification, Councillor Pereira made a good point.
In
Out
30:04
What is the school committee's or your position on how much you need for transportation?
In
Out
30:10
Is it $17 million?
In
Out
30:11
Yes, that is exactly the amount that the school committee passed on April 16th.
In
Out
30:16
It's $17.1 million for non-net school spending.
In
Out
30:20
Okay.
In
Out
30:20
And that has not changed.
In
Out
30:22
That— and that's what we want to know, just to be clear.
In
Out
30:24
And the city is submitting a budget at $16.6 million.
In
Out
30:28
All right, just so we're clear, because I— Councilor Perot was asking some good questions, but I didn't get a clear understanding of what you are advocating for as superintendent for the schools.
In
Out
30:37
It's $17 million.
In
Out
30:39
It is the— it was unanimously passed by the school committee on the 16th of April, which is $17.1 million, and it hasn't changed, although there are very, you know, the variables I just spoke about.
In
Out
30:49
That has not changed.
In
Out
30:50
Okay, I just wanted to be clear before because she made some good points and I wasn't sure what you were saying.
In
Out
30:55
Councilor Kadim.
In
Out
30:57
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
30:58
So I guess I'm in line with Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
31:02
I think if it's $17 million, then that's— or $17.1 million, that's what it should be.
In
Out
31:07
And I appreciate the school department coming before us trying to cooperate with the fact that obviously there are some budget differences and that you're going to live within or try to live within the number that that's, that's funded and appropriated.
In
Out
31:19
However, I'm hearing from the CFO that we have the money, right?
In
Out
31:23
You, you said that if in the future we need to— because we heard it at ordinance that, um, I think it was Mr. Petronio who, who said that, uh, we would have to go to the stabilization.
In
Out
31:33
You corrected him and said that would be the last resort, that we would, we would have some movement in the budget.
In
Out
31:37
So if we have movement in the budget, why wouldn't we just fund the school department, the transportation number of $17.1 million.
In
Out
31:44
And I know there's a discrepancy between what is the actual cost, and we were trying to figure out how they got to the $17.1 million.
In
Out
31:53
But regardless of how they got there, right, it is $17.1 million.
In
Out
31:57
That was what was unanimously voted on by the school committee.
In
Out
32:02
And I think it was Councilor Pereira who said that, you know, obviously we've got open positions, and so by the time we do fillings, there's going to be some savings associated with the salary line items as well.
In
Out
32:13
I mean, I'm assuming that you did 100% of salaries.
In
Out
32:16
No, you didn't.
In
Out
32:17
So the June 30th revised budget, June 26th, whatever date the meeting at June 30th, we had a budget in front of you that now includes vacancy savings.
In
Out
32:25
So there was a detail sheet that was sent out.
In
Out
32:27
So that was done in order to, I'm going to say, amend the budget to account for the million-plus dollars of revenue that was cut from EMS.
In
Out
32:35
So there was a, you know, variety of things that were done, but one of the things that was done was vacancy savings was added in.
In
Out
32:41
So that, I'm going to say, generic wiggle room within the salaries isn't going to be the same anymore because we're already trying to account for that, knowing that it is turned back every year.
In
Out
32:50
So, you know, the idea of the stabilization going back to that thing, that is the last resort.
In
Out
32:54
But, you know, come up by the end of October, we should have our free cash certified for the year.
In
Out
32:58
So that's more of what I was saying.
In
Out
33:00
And then we can transfer from other departments if there's other things.
In
Out
33:02
We could decide to pull back certain services or expenses within other departments at any point in the year if we feel like that's what we need to do to have a stable operating budget, if the transportation costs really are going to be firm.
In
Out
33:14
But that's— so in that sense, yes, there are other areas that we could pull back from if we need to.
In
Out
33:20
So why wouldn't we do that now though, right?
In
Out
33:22
So if we've got to put together a balanced budget, right, you have a number that's coming from the the school department, that transportation costs based on contracts.
In
Out
33:28
And, and again, I know there was 5%, uh, escalator clause in one of the contracts, and I think, you know, there's some variables in other contracts, and especially, uh, special education transportation is a significant variable, right?
In
Out
33:41
So there is a good possibility that transportation goes up, not down, right?
In
Out
33:47
So they could be before us asking for more money than the $17.1 million, right?
In
Out
33:52
So we don't know that that's, that's not the case.
In
Out
33:55
We've heard about redistricting.
In
Out
33:57
Redistricting may provide a savings, but we don't know that.
In
Out
34:00
So this only solid number that we have right now— and I know we can go back and forth, or you can go back and forth and say that you don't necessarily agree with their numbers— but that's the only numbers that were presented to the city, and that at least from one person on the City Council, that I support the $17.1 million.
In
Out
34:15
So why not?
In
Out
34:16
If we have to have a balanced budget, know what their request is, why wouldn't we just give them a 17.1 now, um, and tell the other departments that they've got to find reductions?
In
Out
34:25
Because if you're telling me I got to go do this in, in December, that means you're going to have to find double the, the amount of reductions.
In
Out
34:31
Because if they've already spent half their expense, you know, expense budget, then we're— I mean, it would be before December.
In
Out
34:37
I think we've talked about more of these numbers being firmed up in October, beginning of November.
In
Out
34:42
You're talking about a month, Right?
In
Out
34:43
So I mean, okay, so as opposed to being 6 months already spent, you're, you're 5 months, right?
In
Out
34:47
So you're still gonna be close to doubling, having to make double the cuts to be able to fund what you need if we're waiting for December.
In
Out
34:55
So from my standpoint, let's, let's fund them $17.1 million, and then in November, December, if that number— if the actuals are coming in less, then we can reallocate to the other departments for expenses.
In
Out
35:05
That to me makes more sense as opposed to the opposite of waiting 5, 6 months and having people having to reduce even more.
In
Out
35:14
Yeah, I, I think the, the thought process and opinion was the fact that these departments would be cutting different operations or programs or services that they're providing, cutting it and cutting it off completely to provide a number that they know was in flux and that, you know, has these things that are potentially going down.
In
Out
35:29
So to pull something back that we would change the way we're operating, that, you know, the intent is that this $450,000 wouldn't change the way that the school department's operating.
In
Out
35:37
They're already changing the way they're operating, and that's where the savings is coming in.
In
Out
35:40
It's not like we're coming in saying you're going to stop busing kids to save this.
In
Out
35:44
So that's why, you know, rather than stopping at departments' functions or services that they're providing when there already is potentially a natural savings that's coming from the way that they're choosing to change their operations, it just— to me, I mean, that still takes a vote of the school committee.
In
Out
35:59
There's got to be an analysis done on on redistricting and the buses.
In
Out
36:02
So, so we don't know that there's a guarantee for the redistricting unless it's already taken place.
In
Out
36:06
The redistricting has already taken place technically in the sense of moving students.
In
Out
36:10
It's the bus outcomes that are unsure.
In
Out
36:11
Is that accurate?
In
Out
36:13
The redistricting for this year has taken place.
In
Out
36:15
Okay.
In
Out
36:16
But as I said, we continue to register students.
In
Out
36:18
We have programs that we also, you know, changed.
In
Out
36:21
I mentioned the dual language program has some implications for transportation.
In
Out
36:25
So, so I missed the part that the redistricting has already taken place.
In
Out
36:28
In my mind, it was something that was notified.
In
Out
36:30
Okay, so it's been determined.
In
Out
36:32
So I believe I'm correct.
In
Out
36:35
So status quo, if there were, if there were no students added, are we assuming that there is a savings?
In
Out
36:41
Is that where we get to?
In
Out
36:45
I don't believe we're— yeah, I'm uncomfortable, uncomfortable to assume right now.
In
Out
36:51
I would, I would be in your position too, uncomfortable to assume, but that's the That's the point I'm trying to make is the fact that we've got a redistricting.
In
Out
36:58
We don't know if there is going to be a savings, but we are asked to approve a budget based on something that you are uncomfortable with, right?
In
Out
37:06
An assumption that there is going to be a savings when we don't know there is a savings.
In
Out
37:11
So my take is if it is $17.1 million, that is what we should be funding, $17.1 million.
In
Out
37:18
And I have had this conversation with the administration.
In
Out
37:21
That at that point it should be the 17.1.
In
Out
37:24
Let's regroup from an administration on both sides, come together collectively, and identify how we're coming up with these numbers so that everybody is comfortable and on the same page as how we're making a determination for what the transportation costs are.
In
Out
37:37
Not that we don't believe the numbers that are coming forward, but obviously, uh, there's some differences of opinion from, you know, the city's administration versus the school administration.
In
Out
37:46
But those dialogues need need to take place.
In
Out
37:47
And from my standpoint, well before June, right?
In
Out
37:50
I know these conversations started in June.
In
Out
37:52
That's just, to me, doesn't make any sense.
In
Out
37:55
But we are where we are.
In
Out
37:57
And in the end of July, let's, let's just do the $17.1 million and, and let's figure out where we're getting the money from.
In
Out
38:05
That's, that's, that's where I, I personally think we should be headed in the direction we should be going.
In
Out
38:10
And I also will tell you, as we start to come into a new budget season, which we really start now.
In
Out
38:15
We have a new CFO.
In
Out
38:17
We're going to be working with you.
In
Out
38:19
I mentioned this, I think, when I came before you that first evening.
In
Out
38:22
We will work closely with you.
In
Out
38:23
There will be a state of the schools in November.
In
Out
38:25
We will start our budgeting process if the school committee again approves the process that we will recommend.
In
Out
38:30
So we will be partners with you in this.
In
Out
38:32
We're looking to refine with redistricting.
In
Out
38:36
At this point here, I'm not sure if we'll continue We'll continue to make those efforts.
In
Out
38:40
We'll have to take a look at how this year goes.
In
Out
38:44
It's impacting class size in a positive way.
In
Out
38:46
There are very positives coming out of your decision to redistrict.
In
Out
38:51
And again, I can't say it enough that I was really pleased to call Council President Ponte the next day and to be committed to working together with the City Council and to do this for your taxpayers.
In
Out
39:01
Are there savings that we can look at?
In
Out
39:03
Same thing with the mayor's office.
In
Out
39:04
We will continue.
In
Out
39:06
I know the 2 CFOs have committed to working very closely together in the months to come, and I hope that is going to be the way we do business.
In
Out
39:13
Yeah, and I'm confident in everything you've said because, you know, actions speak louder than, than words.
In
Out
39:19
And you folks have been here more than any other administration on the, on the school side that since I've been on the City Council, I've been on the School Committee, we've seen you more in council chambers than, than anybody.
In
Out
39:29
So I know the collaboration is there.
In
Out
39:32
And quite frankly, I don't envy the position you are in to have to come down and still advocate for the schools on the $17.1 million, but also trying to work with the administration to get a number that makes sense from a budgetary standpoint.
In
Out
39:43
I think the decision is probably difficult for us as councilors to be able to figure out and digest which direction we want to go in, and maybe we all disagree on what that looks like.
In
Out
39:52
I for one support the $17.1 based on the the conversations we're having here and previous conversations, I'm confident that we can get to the table and be more comfortable with the numbers that are being presented next year.
In
Out
40:03
But I think right now, $17.1 million is where we should be at.
In
Out
40:06
If it comes in less than that, then we can deal with it.
In
Out
40:10
If we do it the opposite way, then we're asking departments to make, you know, much more significant cuts than they really should, or we're going to free cash, which, you know, that's— I don't know that that's what we want to do too, but I mean, that's an option.
In
Out
40:22
But at the end of the day, the numbers could come in significantly higher than lower.
In
Out
40:26
So I personally support the 17.1.
In
Out
40:29
That's what I told the mayor I wanted to see, unless we had a commitment that the number was not 17.1.
In
Out
40:35
And I know he had a conversation, and just based on the discussion I'm hearing, what I'm— what I'm hearing from you folks is that you'll work to— you'll do whatever you need to do to work within that number, but the 17.1 is is a solid number, so that's the number I'm going to support moving forward.
In
Out
40:49
With that, I yield.
In
Out
40:50
Thank you.
In
Out
40:50
Councilor Raposo.
In
Out
40:52
Yeah, just one follow-up question.
In
Out
40:53
So after 10/1, and once all the— once the DESE report is submitted, if you have students who enroll after 10/1 and they need busing, how does that operate?
In
Out
41:02
Do they— that does not impact the busing.
In
Out
41:04
The busing is— I'm sorry if I confused you.
In
Out
41:07
The busing is provided to the students no matter when they move in.
In
Out
41:10
If they move in June 1st, yep.
In
Out
41:12
Okay.
In
Out
41:12
That answers my question.
In
Out
41:13
That is just our enrollment figure that we give to the state.
In
Out
41:16
It does impact our Chapter 70 funding.
In
Out
41:19
Okay.
In
Out
41:19
And, and I caught a bit of the school committee, um, they were discussing the rolling over of the SIS.
In
Out
41:24
Have— have that— has that happened yet?
In
Out
41:25
It has not happened yet.
In
Out
41:26
So you don't have an exact number of how many students you have at this moment?
In
Out
41:29
Actually, we have a rough estimate.
In
Out
41:32
We have some numbers.
In
Out
41:33
We just— we pulled them before we left.
In
Out
41:36
If I can, uh, Deputy, if you could just introduce yourself for the record, please.
In
Out
41:40
Liz Legault, Deputy Superintendent.
In
Out
41:42
Thank you.
In
Out
41:43
As of 7/27/26, we have 10,563 students, and we have not rolled over in the SIMS.
In
Out
41:54
But I can tell you the register— so as of 7/27/26, and some of these registrations have not been put in the SIMS, is 604 new completed registrations for the new year.
In
Out
42:07
For last year in comparison, at this time, at 7— at July 27th, '25, we had 566 new completed registrations for the new year.
In
Out
42:18
Do you know your enrollment was at that time last year at that moment?
In
Out
42:22
I don't.
In
Out
42:22
I didn't pull that up.
In
Out
42:24
Do you know what you ended the school year with?
In
Out
42:27
11,000.
In
Out
42:28
I think it was 11,000 students.
In
Out
42:32
Actually, our October 12th— 20th— on October 25th, we certified our enrollment with SIMS at 11,184 students.
In
Out
42:42
So that was what you based your Chapter 70 off of.
In
Out
42:45
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
42:46
I yield to Mr. President.
In
Out
42:46
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
42:47
Councilor Canuel.
In
Out
42:49
Thank you.
In
Out
42:50
Uh, Miss Arkey.
In
Out
42:52
Yeah, here we go.
In
Out
42:55
Um, sorry, we can hear you, Councilor.
In
Out
42:58
Thank you.
In
Out
42:59
Uh, Miss Arpkey, can you just walk us through how we got to the number we're at today?
In
Out
43:05
Because since the last budget, it's gone up $450,000, which is halfway between where we were and where the school committee, uh, approved the number.
In
Out
43:14
So I think, can you walk us through the logic of how you got to that number?
In
Out
43:18
So I think, I think there's been a very clear conversation that we don't have all the data to come up with these numbers of how redistricting is going to impact that.
In
Out
43:26
I think that's been a very clear conversation here.
In
Out
43:28
So given that, you know, we had had conversations about putting the full $900,000 back in, but I then had figured out and heard information about Riveros going back to a community school.
In
Out
43:39
So I looked at the buses that were going to that school that would no longer be needed.
In
Out
43:44
I also understand that what they've talked about, that some of those students have now shifted to these other schools and other programs.
In
Out
43:49
So there might be more additional students that need busing somewhere else.
In
Out
43:52
That could change.
In
Out
43:53
They could need another bus, they could go on to an existing one, and how enrollment could go up.
In
Out
43:57
And so there's all those variables that are in there, but just taking those 5 vehicles— I'm going to call them vehicles because I know it's vans and buses— that number specifically to that one school calculates about $543,000.
In
Out
44:12
So given that there could be others added in somewhere else and there could be other changes The other part of it is the fact the electric buses, there's a lease payment that— so I don't know how many people are familiar with electric buses— that was bought for the school district on a grant.
In
Out
44:28
So there was 10 electric buses, they started going to operation at the end of last year at some time, but we get a lease payment for utilization from the transportation company of $25 per day per bus.
In
Out
44:39
So those numbers haven't really been realized in the budget either.
In
Out
44:42
So those are some things that I know would be savings that aren't necessarily factored in, but there's also other things that keep going.
In
Out
44:48
So with all of those numbers, it, it seemed like that $450,000 was potentially a very real number given some of that other data.
In
Out
44:56
So that's where the $900,000 went to the $450,000.
In
Out
45:01
Okay, but as everybody has stated, it's not a final number.
In
Out
45:04
There's a ton of things that could still continue to change with that.
In
Out
45:08
So if you were to go back and to do what Councilor Kadeem and Councilor Pereira have suggested would be to fully fund it, do you anticipate just raising revenues?
In
Out
45:18
Do you anticipate going back to departments to make cuts?
In
Out
45:22
What's your— I think it, to be honest with you, it'd probably be a combination of both.
In
Out
45:25
I understand that there is, you know, the potential that we could just increase the investment income revenue, but I want to be clear that if we increase that investment income revenue by $400 $350,000, that would put us at the exact budget that we ended with this year in total actuals for the general fund.
In
Out
45:43
So not including the ARPA money being transferred in, we ended around $4.1 million.
In
Out
45:50
So adding the $4.5 to the $3.6 is, is $4.1 million.
In
Out
45:55
And from my side of things and from my experience with budget, you don't— that's just a very bad idea.
In
Out
46:00
So I could increase that maybe a little bit more and be super aggressive with that number, which isn't very comfortable at all, but the other side of it would have to be, you know, pulling expenses from other places.
In
Out
46:12
I've, I've continued to go in and try and adjust the revenues as much as I can.
In
Out
46:15
It's part of how this $450,000 that was added back in was already accounted for.
In
Out
46:19
I'm running out of areas that I feel like we could comfortably take in additional revenue and exceed, you know, the budget and meet the budget.
In
Out
46:28
So So I think it's, it's just getting— it's a very tightly budgeted budget as it is.
In
Out
46:35
I know that we've had conversations in the past, you know, 2 budget cycles with me that it is a much more aggressively budgeted set of revenue than we have been doing.
In
Out
46:45
So we are already kind of pushing the bar, and so we would just be pushing that a little bit closer and closer at this point.
In
Out
46:54
So then if we did go that step of increasing the number and we put the $17.1 in, right, we have to wait then.
In
Out
47:03
Let's assume there is a savings.
In
Out
47:05
Let's assume it does come in lower.
In
Out
47:07
We have to wait till when to be able to utilize that money savings?
In
Out
47:15
I don't know.
In
Out
47:15
So it depends on how we handle it.
In
Out
47:17
So if we put in the $17 million number, I'm going to say today.
In
Out
47:21
The numbers from there to say that there was a savings, we would have to come back down to you to reduce that appropriation.
In
Out
47:27
So depending on how we get there, we could decide to— I'm going to say reallocate it to where it was pulled from.
In
Out
47:32
We could decide to just release it.
In
Out
47:33
So if it's before the tax rate setting process, which is usually mid to end November, then we could just kind of release it in that way.
In
Out
47:41
But if it's done after taxes are set and the revenues are set, I mean, it's you could kind of move it around, but it— or it would just be surplus that would be certified and turned back.
In
Out
47:49
So it's, it's kind of a tough question to say when we would be able to utilize what's being turned back.
In
Out
47:56
It depends on the process that we go through.
In
Out
47:57
If we don't come down to you to reduce an appropriation and to transfer it around, it would just become surplus.
In
Out
48:04
So I hear the concerns of my colleagues.
In
Out
48:07
I think in terms of the— we're talking about $450,000.
In
Out
48:11
The reality though is this is 1/1,000th of this budget.
In
Out
48:15
It's a small number in the grand scheme.
In
Out
48:17
I think that that's a number that can easily be absorbed in other areas if there is a shortfall.
In
Out
48:25
I think we'll know by— sounds like at the end of Q1 of the fiscal year with when the transfer— when the headcounts and the school redistricting, how many buses you have, how many vans you have.
In
Out
48:37
Etc.
In
Out
48:38
I think it's a small enough number that we can potentially absorb.
In
Out
48:41
I'd be surprised if there was any denial by this council or the mayor to fully fund transportation, whatever that true number ends up being.
In
Out
48:51
I get a lot of concern at the prospect of asking department heads to cut back further, potentially cutting services, because once we cut services, we won't be able to restore them for the fiscal year, likely.
In
Out
49:04
So with that, I yield.
In
Out
49:06
Thank you.
In
Out
49:07
Council Vice President Young.
In
Out
49:12
I guess my first question is— well, my first comment is, in terms of the $1 million cut we did in indirects that you had to reduce the budget by, not all of that offset came from funded vacancies, am I correct?
In
Out
49:29
$400,000, I believed, was a reduction on the city side in pension liability to offset that number.
In
Out
49:36
That was part of it, yes.
In
Out
49:37
So there was— there were several things, but I was— I was just— he had spoken about how there would be vacancy savings to turn back and cover some of this, and I wanted to be clear that we had already eaten that up, was all I was saying.
In
Out
49:47
It's not that we didn't do other things to adjust for the million, but that was one of the tools that I had already used to cover that other vacancy the other savings that was needed, so I couldn't use that again for this.
In
Out
49:58
Correct.
In
Out
49:58
However, um, did you use all funded vacancies or a portion and then offset with the $400,000?
In
Out
50:07
So in other words, are there still some unfunded vacancies in the budget at the present time?
In
Out
50:12
So, so the vacancy savings that was added, it's not like I pulled out vacant positions and didn't fund them in the budget.
In
Out
50:18
That's not the way the vacancy savings was applied.
In
Out
50:20
It was applied in sense that there's turnover that happens.
In
Out
50:22
So if a position is, is or was, right, the timing was vacant at the time that the budget went down, that doesn't mean it's even still vacant at this time.
In
Out
50:30
There's turnover, there's gaps that happen, but then usually we fill it again and it cycles around.
In
Out
50:34
Usually when somebody leaves after a couple of years here, the next person coming in is hired at a lower rate.
In
Out
50:39
So those are what I call just like a general vacancy savings that takes place every year that we see in salary turnbacks every year.
In
Out
50:45
It's just the timing of of positions turning over.
In
Out
50:48
So that's what was kind of applied generally.
In
Out
50:50
There was a percentage based on if they have current vacancies, there was a 2% vacancy savings added to the department.
In
Out
50:55
If they had no vacancies but aren't a, you know, but are a department that has more than one employee or that has, you know, that's in a block group, we added up half a percentage vacancy savings based on, you know, kind of what we're historically turning back in a general sense with the general fund operating of salaries.
In
Out
51:14
Okay, so let me try to— I want to make sure I'm clearly understanding what you're saying, because what I'm hearing, I could, I could be entirely— so you're saying that the savings based on vacancies is based on the vacancies you think we're going to have, some turnover we've had, but it doesn't mean those vacancies won't be filled, right?
In
Out
51:39
So it's, it's just a It's a number if you look at— so I had sent out a sheet before the June 30th meeting that detailed out how the vacancy savings was applied, what departments had it, and what amounts it was.
In
Out
51:49
But the way it's being done is saying the base salaries, I'm going to say, of just HR is $100,000.
In
Out
51:56
Because of the positions and the turnover, we're going to say it's about a 2% savings that could happen throughout the year because they currently have a vacancy.
In
Out
52:03
So then now they're budgeted at $98,000.
In
Out
52:06
That's— it's not like we cut a position and said you can't fund it now, but given the fact that as of July 1st they didn't have somebody in the position, the reality is there's likely going to be a savings that we're going to realize in the year on that salary budget that we won't need because clearly there's turnover that's happening and it needs to be replaced.
In
Out
52:22
So that's kind of how that— okay, so basically the savings and the cuts were made on, to a certain degree, assumptions.
In
Out
52:32
So if we've got 100 employees in a department, there's 5 funded vacancies, those 5 funded vacancies are still there and still being funded in the budget?
In
Out
52:43
Correct.
In
Out
52:44
There's a percentage that's taken off of the top because the odds of them being filled perfectly for the full amount for the full year clearly are slim at this point.
In
Out
52:52
So then I guess that tells me that we certainly can cover an additional $400,000, um, where we still have unfunded vacancies.
In
Out
53:06
Because, because you're not funding it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
In
Out
53:10
It just means you're not funding it at this time, right?
In
Out
53:13
That means the department will have to go the entire year without that position.
In
Out
53:17
That's correct, right?
In
Out
53:18
Which, historically, how many departments have had vacancies that have never been filled?
In
Out
53:25
So those ones we went in, but those ones we went in and cut, I would like to remind you of that.
In
Out
53:28
So the ones that— the 2 in facilities, the plumber and the electrician, we did cut those, the full vacancy amount.
In
Out
53:34
We did pull that out.
In
Out
53:36
Um, the other one was in planning, planning or engineering, one of his departments.
In
Out
53:41
I'm sorry, it's one of the departments that he has.
In
Out
53:43
He's had a clerk position that he hasn't filled in over 2 years, so we did fully cut that one out.
In
Out
53:48
So the ones that have been chronic for more than a year, we did pull whole at that point.
In
Out
53:53
So, but you would agree this, this— there are still a number of funded vacancies that could be unfunded to compensate if, if we need the money?
In
Out
54:03
That's a choice that the council could make, yes.
In
Out
54:05
Yeah, okay.
In
Out
54:08
Um, that's interesting.
In
Out
54:10
That's an interesting way to cut a budget by projection and assumption.
In
Out
54:15
Um, I hope it works out.
In
Out
54:17
There are other cities that do that.
In
Out
54:19
It's not an unheard of idea.
In
Out
54:22
Okay, um, now in terms of the electric buses, what did you determine the offset might be?
In
Out
54:27
It's $45,000 for the 10 buses for the 180 days of the year.
In
Out
54:31
The calculation is $45,000.
In
Out
54:34
And you came to that number how?
In
Out
54:35
It's $25 a day per bus per day, and it's 180 school days that they bus.
In
Out
54:41
So that savings isn't already calculated in transportation and, and the school department's numbers?
In
Out
54:47
My understanding is no, because the buses didn't— weren't online for most of last year.
In
Out
54:52
The timing of receiving the buses and getting them up and running, it wasn't online for most of last year.
In
Out
54:56
So that, that's why it hasn't, hasn't been realized yet.
In
Out
55:02
Would everybody agree with that?
In
Out
55:05
I don't want to put anybody on the spot, but, you know, I feel like some of this assumption, some of it isn't.
In
Out
55:12
I want to know what's rock solid and what's assumption.
In
Out
55:15
And if it's not a completely accurate statement, I think we need to know that.
In
Out
55:20
So from a financial standpoint, would you be able to opine on that?
In
Out
55:24
If you can just move the microphone to you.
In
Out
55:25
Should we make a motion to waive the rules and bring Mr. Pacheco to the table?
In
Out
55:29
We already did that, but Mr. Pacheco can come down.
In
Out
55:31
We waived the rules already.
In
Out
55:32
So you, you want to, you want to speak on Councilor Dionne's comments, or at all from a financial— I don't know.
In
Out
55:40
I didn't know about the $25 per bus.
In
Out
55:42
Understood.
In
Out
55:42
Mr. Pacheco.
In
Out
55:46
So it's an accurate state— it's an accurate statement that it is $25 a day on the electric buses and all the days that they're in service, and it is the numbers that Emily said.
In
Out
56:02
The $45,000.
In
Out
56:03
We did not have it.
In
Out
56:05
The buses were in service for about 27 days, 28 days this year, but they will be in full service.
In
Out
56:14
So you're realizing a savings this year that you didn't have last year, is that what you're saying?
In
Out
56:20
Yes.
In
Out
56:20
And do you know what that fully amounts to?
In
Out
56:22
Like, it's, it's the same as Emily said.
In
Out
56:25
That's a full year, $45,000 for a full year.
In
Out
56:28
All right, well, that's still a far cry in a $17 million budget, but I— okay, I appreciate that.
In
Out
56:33
And then I have another question.
In
Out
56:35
Um, and the savings per bus, how did you determine that number?
In
Out
56:40
And what, what did that— what was the totality of that per bus?
In
Out
56:45
And you said, so Vivera School's gonna be a community school, they have 5 buses, so that means they didn't need X number of dollars because they don't have the 5 buses.
In
Out
56:53
So where did you get those numbers, 3 buses, 2 vans?
In
Out
56:56
It's 3 buses, 2 vans, but again, as they've stated, that's not necessarily a final thing.
In
Out
57:01
Something could change with that, but that is what is the— at the time it is a community school.
In
Out
57:07
Obviously that can change.
In
Out
57:08
That's been a very clear statement that that could change.
In
Out
57:09
Transportation needs could still change for that.
In
Out
57:12
Um, but with that, those numbers, it's, it's $543,000.
In
Out
57:16
I have that.
In
Out
57:16
So I pulled the actual invoices that were coming out from those— from that school from last year.
In
Out
57:21
I pulled it in June.
In
Out
57:23
The way it works is it's 180 days of schooling that you transport kids, so there's a per bus, per van rate.
In
Out
57:30
There's a monitor rate, you know, that is charged based on those usages.
In
Out
57:34
So I pulled the actual invoices of what was currently being done there for FY26 and calculated that with the rates that are provided by each of those vendors for '27, and that's where that $5 543.
In
Out
57:47
I have it somewhere in front of me.
In
Out
57:48
I just have too many things.
In
Out
57:49
We'll call it 543.
In
Out
57:52
But so in reality though, to a certain extent, that number is based on assumption— assuming we're not going to need those buses or vans, assuming things aren't going to change, assuming we're not going to get students that are going to require that transportation.
In
Out
58:13
Is that an accurate statement?
In
Out
58:15
Correct.
In
Out
58:15
And that's why that number could change completely.
In
Out
58:17
Correct.
In
Out
58:18
Which is why, why I was only comfortable putting in an estimate of closer to 450, knowing that that number could change.
In
Out
58:23
There could be something else needed somewhere else.
In
Out
58:25
Other, you know, needs could arise just within where those students were moved to and whatnot.
In
Out
58:30
So that was part of why I then took a very clear calculated number.
In
Out
58:35
If you really calculate those buses, is an exact number you can come up with, but the reason that I didn't put that in front of you is because there are other variables that could come into play.
In
Out
58:43
So I was trying to pull it back and be safe.
In
Out
58:45
And then the $45,000, so that leaves at least a whole nother bus or 2 that, you know, could potentially— a bus or a van that could be added in without a single need.
In
Out
58:57
So I guess my final statement would be that as one counselor I can't say that I'm completely comfortable with cuts in a budget that are based on assumption, cuts in transportation that are based on assumption, minus hard facts, minus variables.
In
Out
59:20
I— for me, I find that to be a bit of a problem, and I don't know that I'm comfortable with the number at this point either based on that.
In
Out
59:28
That.
In
Out
59:29
I, I mean, you know, when I— when you figure out a budget, you generally know how much you have, what everything's going to cost, and then you can come up with a rock-solid budget.
In
Out
59:39
I mean, I could assume that my electric would go down $100 a month for the next 6 months, but if it doesn't and I don't budget for it, I'm in trouble.
In
Out
59:47
So with that, I yield.
In
Out
59:48
Thank you, Councilor Khmera.
In
Out
59:56
Sorry, the McKinney-Vento fund, how much money is left in that fund?
In
Out
1:00:00
Just curious.
In
Out
1:00:01
So the, the current balance as of— I think I pulled the number last on Friday at about 5 o'clock— was, um, it's $700,000— $779,000.
In
Out
1:00:17
Thank you.
In
Out
1:00:22
$634.68.
In
Out
1:00:23
All right, so some of that's already factored into this budget.
In
Out
1:00:25
I want to be clear.
In
Out
1:00:26
How much of it?
In
Out
1:00:27
So there's probably about $600,000 that's factored into this budget already to be used from that fund balance that hasn't— that's been sitting there.
In
Out
1:00:36
All right, thank you.
In
Out
1:00:38
Without a yell.
In
Out
1:00:39
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
1:00:40
Councilor Kadim.
In
Out
1:00:42
All right.
In
Out
1:00:45
So in terms of the appropriation order that's before us, so under education and transportation is $12.8 million.
In
Out
1:00:53
So I don't have my budget book in front of me.
In
Out
1:00:55
What makes up the $16, what's the difference between the $16.6 and the $12.8?
In
Out
1:01:03
That is $2 million of McKinney-Vento, $2 million flat.
In
Out
1:01:07
And then the number from Circuit Breaker that the school committee had voted on for transportation, which is, thank you, $1.816652.
In
Out
1:01:20
So $1.86 was what?
In
Out
1:01:22
Circuit breaker, sorry.
In
Out
1:01:23
Oh, circuit breaker.
In
Out
1:01:25
And then you said $2 million from McKinney-Vento, but— The school committee had voted on $1.4 million.
In
Out
1:01:32
So $2 million is with, you know, assuming we would spend spend some of that savings, the fund balance that's in there, of $600,000 of that fund balance.
In
Out
1:01:42
And then they commit in $1.4 million for reimbursement that's coming in in FY27, is that— yeah, so it's $600,000 that's already there.
In
Out
1:01:49
The $1.4 million is the estimate of what's going to be coming in, so that's what makes up the $2 million.
In
Out
1:01:54
And then it leaves obviously a little bit of— wow, a little bit of wiggle room.
In
Out
1:02:00
Sorry.
In
Out
1:02:00
So what are we anticipating for McKinney-Vento?
In
Out
1:02:03
Coming in for next year?
In
Out
1:02:04
Around 1.4 is the number.
In
Out
1:02:06
So you're using 100%?
In
Out
1:02:07
Yes, so in this past year we did use 100% as well.
In
Out
1:02:11
It's the balances in there from previous years that we weren't using 100%.
In
Out
1:02:15
Okay.
In
Out
1:02:24
And then just, I'm just struggling and I, heard one of my colleagues, and I appreciate not wanting to see additional cuts, but I, I think from, from my standpoint, it's hard to, to say that if we approve anything less than $17.1 million, we're essentially approving a budget that's not balanced, right?
In
Out
1:02:43
Agreed.
In
Out
1:02:44
So you agree with that?
In
Out
1:02:47
I agree with that.
In
Out
1:02:47
That's what's been stated at this point.
In
Out
1:02:50
I think it's, uh, I, I can't speak on my opinion on how everybody should move forward and view the budget, but I put down a balanced budget that is balanced with everything that's in there.
In
Out
1:03:01
And I— there's always going to be variables.
In
Out
1:03:04
Even if that $17 million number was down, other things could come in and other things could change that would change that number.
In
Out
1:03:09
So it's, it's always going to be that way.
In
Out
1:03:12
Listen, I, I recognize that.
In
Out
1:03:13
I've, I've put a number of budgets together myself, but when you make reductions and And I don't disagree, budgets are, are all based on assumptions.
In
Out
1:03:23
It's a living document.
In
Out
1:03:24
I recognize that.
In
Out
1:03:25
However, when you, when you're making reductions, you've identified what the expenses are.
In
Out
1:03:29
In this, in this case, we can't go back to the school department and say that you need to reduce your transportation from $17.1 down to the $16.6, right?
In
Out
1:03:41
So let's just call it $500,000.
In
Out
1:03:42
So they're not cutting buses.
In
Out
1:03:45
They're not telling kids you got to walk to school.
In
Out
1:03:47
Or find another mode of transportation, right?
In
Out
1:03:49
So at that point, to me, it's an actual expenditure.
In
Out
1:03:53
So we shouldn't be starting there to make the cuts.
In
Out
1:03:56
But they're already doing things that are changing the number of buses that are needed.
In
Out
1:03:59
It's not that we're telling them to do that.
In
Out
1:04:01
They told us that they are doing that and it is changing the number of buses.
In
Out
1:04:03
I've heard that, but I've also heard the school department say they're not comfortable with anything less than $17.1 million.
In
Out
1:04:08
So I don't know how we— say that this is a balanced budget.
In
Out
1:04:13
So we've got a department that's coming back before us, and they have no way, if that number comes in at $17.1 million, to be able to cut expenses in transportation.
In
Out
1:04:26
So if we go anywhere else, any other departments, I mean, we can cut— the police department can cut overtime, the police department can cut training, they can cut a number of different areas.
In
Out
1:04:36
The treasurer's office can can go and cut expenses, the fire department can cut expenses, but the school department can't cut transportation, right?
In
Out
1:04:44
There's a mandate associated with transporting students to school.
In
Out
1:04:48
So from my standpoint, anything less than $17.1 million is approving a budget that is not balanced unless we find other ways.
In
Out
1:04:57
So in terms of the local receipts, I know you're conservative in terms of the local receipts coming in, Where are— are you at 98% of the local receipts?
In
Out
1:05:08
Are you overly aggressive with your estimates?
In
Out
1:05:10
Is there any room in other areas?
In
Out
1:05:12
I believe that the calculation that, um, it states it in the mayor's letter, it's, it's 88, maybe 0.6% of local receipts.
In
Out
1:05:21
So, so pretty much yes.
In
Out
1:05:25
And then, uh, the reserve fund, the $578,000 $517.
In
Out
1:05:31
That's— so we don't have a contract with police, fire, Teamsters that's been settled yet.
In
Out
1:05:36
So that's intended to help cover contracts that are completely unfunded at this point.
In
Out
1:05:42
But it's not going to cover the entire contracts.
In
Out
1:05:44
Would that be an accurate statement?
In
Out
1:05:45
I have no— I couldn't say.
In
Out
1:05:47
It could at this point.
In
Out
1:05:49
It would never cover the retro and the new year contract.
In
Out
1:05:53
To say that it couldn't possibly cover the year that is taking place, I can't say that, but I can tell you obviously it wouldn't cover the retro, but we typically would pay the retros from one-time money anyhow because it is really a one-time payment at that point.
In
Out
1:06:06
Right, so why wouldn't we just take the reserve fund, fund that transportation, and then obviously through negotiations come back down to the council for an appropriation order because you're gonna have to do that anyways, right?
In
Out
1:06:16
So it's not gonna cover the entire amount.
In
Out
1:06:19
That's again also a a choice that could be made and that could work.
In
Out
1:06:24
I'm going to say the same way, but from my standpoint then, at least we have a balanced budget.
In
Out
1:06:29
We've got money that's going to the schools that are going to be used, and then any type of negotiation— that in the form of a motion?
In
Out
1:06:34
Well, I, I could make— I could make that in a form of motion.
In
Out
1:06:37
Make it in the form of a motion.
In
Out
1:06:38
So moved.
In
Out
1:06:39
But I, I don't know that we have the authority to, to make the changes.
In
Out
1:06:41
But I would say that that could be the same thing though, using that reserve fund to cover that $450, whether it's to today or whether it's a month from now, that could still be the case that we could send down— I'm going to say amend the appropriation and revise the appropriation before you if that's the will of the council.
In
Out
1:06:56
So I just would say that you're right, I don't know if we can move that line item today, but if that's the will of the council, we could send down an order for the next meeting to move it over.
In
Out
1:07:04
To me, that's the cleanest way to do it.
In
Out
1:07:06
And then, because I— because you can make an argument that negotiations is a variable right now because you don't know where it's going to end and you're going to have to come down from appropriation.
In
Out
1:07:12
So for me, it's the cleanest way to do it.
In
Out
1:07:15
We have the ability to give the $17 million, $17.1 million to the schools, and then we'll just deal with how we're going to handle the negotiations for, for the various collective bargaining groups.
In
Out
1:07:23
I mean, at that point, there might be known savings from transportation that we can move back.
In
Out
1:07:27
So, right.
In
Out
1:07:28
So, and it's not unusual for municipalities to use one-time money for the first appropriation of the contract and then build it So that's, I mean, that's pretty standard in other communities.
In
Out
1:07:41
So to me, that's the cleanest way to do it.
In
Out
1:07:43
It gives the schools the transportation number that they need.
In
Out
1:07:46
And then to your point, you know, when we get closer to quarter 2, we can make a determination if there's additional money.
In
Out
1:07:52
And then if we have contracts that come back before us, we can make transfers internally and then also offset it with some free cash stabilization and then just, you know, fund those contracts and move forward.
In
Out
1:08:03
You know, I think that to me is the, is the cleanest way, and we get this budget behind us.
In
Out
1:08:07
And, and, you know, I think the council is comfortable with the fact that we're approving a budget that's balanced.
In
Out
1:08:13
So, so there's a motion on the floor by Councilor Kadim to send a communication to the administration on getting the amount from where?
In
Out
1:08:21
From the, um, reserve, the reserve fund, for the amount of how much?
In
Out
1:08:26
So zero out, uh, I4 to zero.
In
Out
1:08:30
And it's only short $450,000 right now.
In
Out
1:08:32
Oh, whatever the— yeah, it's— they're only short $450,000.
In
Out
1:08:36
So, so reduce by $450,000, correct?
In
Out
1:08:39
Okay, we can, we can do that.
In
Out
1:08:41
Actually, if that's the case, we can do that when we have it, uh, in our appropriation vote, so it wouldn't be necessary.
In
Out
1:08:46
But I don't think you could put it into another line.
In
Out
1:08:48
Reduce that one.
In
Out
1:08:50
Yeah, which is also fine.
In
Out
1:08:50
I just wanted to be clear.
In
Out
1:08:52
Motion as made by Councilor Kadeem, uh, to suggest to the administration that they send down the transportation line, um, taking out, uh, out of the $570,517, $450,000.
In
Out
1:09:07
Was that the correct number?
In
Out
1:09:08
Yes, $450,000 has been made by Councilor Kadim, seconded by Council Vice President Dion.
In
Out
1:09:15
I know Councilor Lapekka needs to speak, but on the, on the suggested letter, any further discussion on that?
In
Out
1:09:20
No, to be honest with you, I would like to— sorry, to be honest, I'd like to table it, let her fix that tomorrow, and let's come back tomorrow and get this budget done.
In
Out
1:09:28
I wouldn't be able to do that tomorrow because we have to post it.
In
Out
1:09:31
Yeah, well, if we table it— yeah, can we table this meeting and come back?
In
Out
1:09:36
I mean, Mr. President, if I could— you could take a recess if the Director of Financial Services would like to provide a new financial order, appropriation order.
In
Out
1:09:44
Move it like that.
In
Out
1:09:45
That's fine.
In
Out
1:09:47
Submits a revised appropriation and the council could vote on it tonight.
In
Out
1:09:51
If we can do that tonight, I'll allow it because it's not anticipated as well.
In
Out
1:09:54
Good.
In
Out
1:09:54
We want to take a 5-minute recess.
In
Out
1:21:43
This Farver City Council meeting is now back in session after a brief recess.
In
Out
1:21:47
Um, at this point, um, who had the floor?
In
Out
1:21:50
I don't remember.
In
Out
1:21:51
Uh, Councilor Kadeem.
In
Out
1:21:52
Councilor Kadeem, you had the floor.
In
Out
1:21:53
You haven't yielded yet.
In
Out
1:21:54
I'll give you the floor back if you'd like.
In
Out
1:21:55
I'll yield it to you, Mr. President.
In
Out
1:21:56
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
1:21:57
Uh, Councilor Peckham.
In
Out
1:22:01
Actually, I yield the floor.
In
Out
1:22:02
Thank you.
In
Out
1:22:02
Any further discussion?
In
Out
1:22:04
No.
In
Out
1:22:05
Um, Madam Clerk, uh, if you could please introduce this item into the record, please.
In
Out
1:22:10
Be it ordered that the annual budget for fiscal year 2027 from various funds is $483,583,582, of which the amount of $471,937,983 be raised from ordinary revenue and municipal receipts for appropriation.
In
Out
1:22:35
Any discussion?
In
Out
1:22:36
Just— Councilor Locatino.
In
Out
1:22:38
Just quickly, so to go over this, so you moved the $450— Yeah, so I moved it from I-4 to G-2.
In
Out
1:22:50
And so that new number is $13,250,048, and then the $2 million from McKinney Vento, and then the $1.8 from Circuit breaker, correct?
In
Out
1:22:59
Yeah, they reduced 17.1.
In
Out
1:23:00
Yeah.
In
Out
1:23:02
Okay, I yield.
In
Out
1:23:03
Councilor Peckham.
In
Out
1:23:05
Actually, uh, good evening.
In
Out
1:23:07
Just one question.
In
Out
1:23:08
So as far as our ARPA expenditures and the deadline of September 31st for all projects, where are we with that?
In
Out
1:23:17
So there's a— the deadline is mixed between September and December.
In
Out
1:23:24
Between depending on what the funding source was.
In
Out
1:23:25
So Bristol County has an earlier deadline, and then there's certain categories that qualify for ARPA that have to be spent on that earlier deadline, but then the rest of it is December 31st.
In
Out
1:23:36
I don't— I apologize, I don't have any of that in front of me to tell.
In
Out
1:23:41
I know that when we've been checking in, departments seem to be on track.
In
Out
1:23:44
We are definitely dwindling down on it, so I don't have those numbers in front of me at this time.
In
Out
1:23:49
I would I apologize, I've been very in the weeds of the budget instead.
In
Out
1:23:52
Yeah, go ahead.
In
Out
1:23:56
What I was doing this week is going through the book.
In
Out
1:23:59
When Kara Hum left us as of March 31st, she reconciled all the numbers, and we're going to be asking— the mayor asked me this week to get a report from the city auditor to show where we are right now, and we're going to be following up with everyone who's got any outstanding funds.
In
Out
1:24:15
To see that all is expended according to the guidelines of ARPA.
In
Out
1:24:19
Okay, good.
In
Out
1:24:20
So no question as to projects right now?
In
Out
1:24:24
Everything seems— because I don't want to hit that deadline and then we're giving the federal government back money.
In
Out
1:24:29
Yeah, no, we don't want to do that either.
In
Out
1:24:31
And, um, I've spoken— the biggest number of projects is with Mr. Oliveira in facilities.
In
Out
1:24:36
Spoken with him, he said his projects are all on cue, so we are going have a sit-down with everyone, find out, um, especially include the OPM of the project at the Lewiston Street facility and make sure we're on target because that is, um, September 30th.
In
Out
1:24:53
Yeah, September.
In
Out
1:24:54
And what do we have into that project already, do you know?
In
Out
1:24:58
Funding-wise, I don't right off the top of my head because I haven't, um, gotten together yet with the city auditor to see where we are now.
In
Out
1:25:05
I think they want to say there was I thought there was like $8 million left.
In
Out
1:25:09
Yeah, point of information, when, when, um, Attorney Hom left, uh, $8.1 million had been expended and we still had $8 million in ARPA funding because it was a $16 million project.
In
Out
1:25:22
Okay, and there's no questions with that because I drove by recently and it doesn't look like much has been done.
In
Out
1:25:29
So from now until the end of September, we're going to get that project done.
In
Out
1:25:34
And that's what I am told, Councillor.
In
Out
1:25:36
And what we can do is we can provide an update to the council as well once we know what the new number totally expended as of, say, July 31st is, and then what the deadlines are from there.
In
Out
1:25:47
We'll be glad to provide that information.
In
Out
1:25:49
I appreciate it.
In
Out
1:25:50
Is there a way to reach out to Mr. Oliveira Porras and get me a response by Thursday, sometime on Thursday?
In
Out
1:25:56
Absolutely.
In
Out
1:25:56
I appreciate it.
In
Out
1:25:57
With that, I yield.
In
Out
1:25:57
Thank you.
In
Out
1:25:57
Thank you.
In
Out
1:25:58
Council Vice President Dion.
In
Out
1:26:00
You good?
In
Out
1:26:00
Oh yeah, I'm good now.
In
Out
1:26:01
Thank you.
In
Out
1:26:01
I'm sorry.
In
Out
1:26:02
Is there a motion?
In
Out
1:26:03
A motion to adopt the order as amended.
In
Out
1:26:07
Motion to adopt as amended.
In
Out
1:26:09
The amendment is the amendment— the appropriation.
In
Out
1:26:11
I'm sorry, motion to approve the appropriation.
In
Out
1:26:14
There's no amendment necessary because we haven't amended anything, right?
In
Out
1:26:16
To be clear, Madam Clerk, motion to approve the appropriation before us.
In
Out
1:26:20
The new appropriation that has been introduced by the clerk has been made by Council Vice President Dion, seconded by Councilor McAdams.
In
Out
1:26:25
Discussion on the approval of the appropriation?
In
Out
1:26:27
Hearing none, roll call on the vote, please.
In
Out
1:26:30
Councilor Kadim?
In
Out
1:26:31
Yes.
In
Out
1:26:32
Camara?
In
Out
1:26:32
Yes.
In
Out
1:26:33
Canuel?
In
Out
1:26:34
Yes.
In
Out
1:26:35
Dion?
In
Out
1:26:35
Yes.
In
Out
1:26:36
Hart?
In
Out
1:26:36
Yes.
In
Out
1:26:38
Peckham?
In
Out
1:26:38
No.
In
Out
1:26:39
Pereira?
In
Out
1:26:40
Yes.
In
Out
1:26:40
Raposo?
In
Out
1:26:41
Yes.
In
Out
1:26:42
President Ponte?
In
Out
1:26:43
Yes.
In
Out
1:26:44
Motion carries 8 yeas, 1 nay.
In
Out
1:26:48
Thank you, Madam Clerk.
In
Out
1:26:49
Next order of business.
In
Out
1:26:52
Motion grant leave to withdraw on that.
In
Out
1:26:54
Just ask her, introduce it, and we'll certainly do that.
In
Out
1:26:56
Item 4 is a communication from the mayor and the second revised proposed fiscal year 2027 municipal budget July continuing appropriation order.
In
Out
1:27:06
Motion to grant the item leave to withdraw has been made by Councilor Raposo, seconded by Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
1:27:11
All those in favor?
In
Out
1:27:12
Aye.
In
Out
1:27:12
Opposed?
In
Out
1:27:13
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:27:14
Mr. President, if I could just for a question of, uh, procedure.
In
Out
1:27:18
I'm not sure if granting the, um, order leave to withdraw equals a rejection.
In
Out
1:27:24
There was a, a question that had come up in the past.
In
Out
1:27:28
Let, let's just do both.
In
Out
1:27:30
So motion to reject would be appropriate, made by Councilor Raposo, seconded by Councilor Canuel.
In
Out
1:27:35
Discussion on the rejection?
In
Out
1:27:36
Hearing none, all those in favor?
In
Out
1:27:37
Opposed?
In
Out
1:27:38
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:27:39
Thank you, Madam Clerk.
In
Out
1:27:41
Item 5 is a communication from the City Council President and the policy and ordinance on the use of outside legal counsel.
In
Out
1:27:50
Motion to accept the item and place it on file has been made by Councilor Raposo, seconded by Councilor Canuel.
In
Out
1:27:55
I'm just going to speak on this very briefly as, as a letter for you all.
In
Out
1:27:59
The reason I drafted the letter and added it to the agenda tonight is because many colleagues, and I know Councilor Pereira and Councilor Camara both spoke on having a policy policy in place so that everybody was on the same page when it comes to utilizing outside counsel.
In
Out
1:28:15
I made this letter to you all with a copy of the already approved policy that was had when we had KP Law here.
In
Out
1:28:22
I want the council to have the ability to give their own opinions, to provide any kind of written communication to the city clerk on what policy— what part of the policy you would like to see changed.
In
Out
1:28:33
And then this council then would be able to vote on the new policy policy as a new council at a future meeting.
In
Out
1:28:38
So I just wanted to offer everybody that fair and equal opportunity, and that's why I sent this letter, added it to the agenda tonight.
In
Out
1:28:45
Councilor Peckham, did you want to speak?
In
Out
1:28:47
I saw your hand raised.
In
Out
1:28:48
No, no.
In
Out
1:28:49
Councilor Raposo, he answered my question.
In
Out
1:28:51
Thank you.
In
Out
1:28:51
Any further discussion?
In
Out
1:28:52
No.
In
Out
1:28:53
Motion to accept the item and place it on file has been made and seconded.
In
Out
1:28:56
All those in favor?
In
Out
1:28:57
Aye.
In
Out
1:28:57
Opposed?
In
Out
1:28:58
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:29:00
And then is it the will of the council to reconsider the proposed ordinance related to the salary amendment of the Director of Health and Human Services?
In
Out
1:29:08
So moved.
In
Out
1:29:09
Motion to, uh, pass the item through second reading and enrollment as amended.
In
Out
1:29:12
Motion to reconsider.
In
Out
1:29:13
Well, motion to reconsider would be first.
In
Out
1:29:15
Is there a motion?
In
Out
1:29:16
Motion to reconsider has been made by Councilor Kadim, seconded by who?
In
Out
1:29:20
Councilor Kamara.
In
Out
1:29:22
Uh, will you— that would be appropriate.
In
Out
1:29:25
Yeah, a motion to reconsider has been made and seconded.
In
Out
1:29:27
Hearing no further discussions.
In
Out
1:29:28
All those in favor?
In
Out
1:29:29
Aye.
In
Out
1:29:29
Opposed?
In
Out
1:29:30
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:29:31
Just to be on the safe side, Councilor Camara wasn't on the prevailing side.
In
Out
1:29:34
Yeah, that's why I was thinking about that, but maybe— yeah, no problem.
In
Out
1:29:39
Motion to reconsider.
In
Out
1:29:40
Let's do this again correctly.
In
Out
1:29:42
Motion to reconsider has been made by Councilor Khadim, seconded by Council Vice President Dion.
In
Out
1:29:46
Hearing no further discussion, all those in favor?
In
Out
1:29:48
Aye.
In
Out
1:29:48
Opposed?
In
Out
1:29:50
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:29:51
Motion to pass for second reading and enrollment.
In
Out
1:29:52
Motion to pass the item through second reading and Enrollment as amended has been made by Councilor Raposo, seconded by Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
1:29:58
Discussion?
In
Out
1:29:59
Hearing none, all those in favor?
In
Out
1:30:01
Aye.
In
Out
1:30:01
Opposed?
In
Out
1:30:02
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:30:03
If we could have a brief recess to sign the ordinance, please.
In
Out
1:30:07
3-minute recess.
In
Out
1:31:42
For our city council meeting is now back in session, Madam Clerk.
In
Out
1:31:46
And the last item before you for passage to be ordained is the salary amendment ordinance for the Director of Health and Human Services.
In
Out
1:31:55
Motion to pass the item to be ordained as amended has been made by Councilor Raposo, seconded by Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
1:31:59
Discussion?
In
Out
1:32:00
Hearing none, all those in favor?
In
Out
1:32:01
Opposed?
In
Out
1:32:02
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:32:03
That's all we have, Mr. President.
In
Out
1:32:04
Motion to adjourn has been made by Councilor Raposo, seconded by Councilor Hart.
In
Out
1:32:08
All those in favor?
In
Out
1:32:08
Aye.
In
Out
1:32:08
Opposed?
In
Out
1:32:09
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:32:09
Good night.
In
Out
1:32:09
Thank you.
In
Out