City of Fall River Meetings
Search and subscribe to city meeting topics that impact you
Newsletters
Subscribe
← Back to video
7.30.2026 City Council - Committee on Public Safety
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
0:00
on Public Safety, July 30th, 2026, at 2 PM.
In
Out
0:05
Clerk, call the roll.
In
Out
0:07
Here.
In
Out
0:08
Here.
In
Out
0:09
Here.
In
Out
0:10
Pursuant to the Open Meeting Law, any person may make an audio or video recording of this public meeting or may transmit the meeting through any medium.
In
Out
0:17
Attendees are therefore advised that such recordings or transmissions are being made, whether perceived or unperceived, by those present and are deemed acknowledged and permissible.
In
Out
0:28
Number 1 on the agenda, citizens input.
In
Out
0:31
We have Michael O'Regan, 1198 Meridian Street, subject 1710 GIS study.
In
Out
0:39
Good afternoon, Mr. O'Regan.
In
Out
0:41
How you doing?
In
Out
0:43
Back again.
In
Out
0:45
So, uh, we've had some discussions, uh, in the past about the, uh, staffing, minimum staffing.
In
Out
0:51
And so we had a fire on Hick Street the other day And I think this is one of the perfect examples of what a 1710 standard does.
In
Out
0:58
Even though the city has not kept up with their agreement on boosting up our manpower, there hasn't been any movement towards completing that agreement, the extra manpower we did have did make an appreciable difference in that fire, where we stopped that fire where normally, I would say, 2, 3, 4 years ago, it would have been probably a different outcome.
In
Out
1:23
Now, we did our own GIS study.
In
Out
1:25
Now, the GIS study takes into account the hazards, the population, the square miles, and whether or not the city is safe.
In
Out
1:36
And so the city of Fall River had a study, and they spent, uh, around probably $75,000.
In
Out
1:44
The union, we had to study And it costs us nothing.
In
Out
1:47
Um, and the outcome of those studies shows— and I, I believe that the city study actually was more favorable for the fire department than our union study— saying that we are not safe.
In
Out
2:02
There are significant gaps in the city where there's no coverage whatsoever.
In
Out
2:08
And I know we talk about New Bedford and how New Bedford's mayor's gutting them and, and creating some serious public safety issues.
In
Out
2:17
We're on the cusp of doing that again.
In
Out
2:19
Then we're talking about budgets and stuff, but like I said, public safety should not be a line item.
In
Out
2:24
It should be funded first, not last.
In
Out
2:27
And these studies show that.
In
Out
2:29
And I'll have the both— to say we're doing a comparable study on both of those and the differences between them and where we need that work.
In
Out
2:36
So that's in the progress now, and you guys are all going to get that the next, uh, next meeting, I hope.
In
Out
2:41
But it shows that we do need to replace those pumps that we lost, and we do need to add a ladder truck.
In
Out
2:49
If we're developing the entire waterfront, the numbers were— was 5,800 people within an 8th of a mile area, and it's already a mess.
In
Out
2:56
It's a nightmare.
In
Out
2:58
We don't have the ability with manpower or trucks to respond to anything like that.
In
Out
3:05
And I, and I made the point that several— about a month ago, we were down to one actual functioning ladder truck in this city.
In
Out
3:12
And if Gabriel House had happened during that time period, it would have been far different.
In
Out
3:17
We have pumps that break down on the regular.
In
Out
3:20
If they would have broken down at a fire like sometimes they do, the outcome of that wouldn't have been 10.
In
Out
3:25
It would have been double or triple that.
In
Out
3:28
And so here I am again to say that we do need to prioritize this stuff, and we need to get reliable trucks, and we do need to get that manpower so we can fill in those gaps, because there is no tomorrow for some people.
In
Out
3:41
For someone that dies in a fire, there is no tomorrow, or they lose all their belongings.
In
Out
3:46
We have to be there when we're called, and, and all the manpower in the world doesn't matter if we don't have trucks to drive in.
In
Out
3:52
We've been underfunded, understaffed, and overwhelmed for a long time, and I think that this latest incident has shown just how bad it could get, and it could have got worse, and it can get worse.
In
Out
4:03
40 seconds left.
In
Out
4:04
I'm good.
In
Out
4:05
Any questions?
In
Out
4:07
Actually, I do.
In
Out
4:07
Thank you, Mr. O'Regan.
In
Out
4:09
Um, do you know how many spare pieces we have as frontline pieces right now, operating as frontline pieces?
In
Out
4:16
We may be using both of them right now.
In
Out
4:18
Yeah, we've got Engine 11 and Engine 5, and 26 might be in use.
In
Out
4:25
I know Engine 5 is at the Globe, and that's got a blown engine, so we're just using that until It fails.
In
Out
4:31
Thank you.
In
Out
4:32
Okay, and describe the gaps in coverage.
In
Out
4:36
When you say gaps, what, what do you mean by gaps in coverage?
In
Out
4:39
So if you look at the south end, uh, the south end of the city, uh, it's how many pieces of apparatus can be on scene, uh, within 5 minutes.
In
Out
4:48
And because you have one truck in the Globe and everybody else is up on Plymouth Avenue, and then the next station after that is either the Flint or the Center, that gap that's there down toward the bottom of Newhall Street where we do get fires, and we get— we just had a drowning down there.
In
Out
5:03
Those areas where those apparatus and those men, that manpower can get there within 5 minutes, it doesn't fall, it, it doesn't pass.
In
Out
5:10
And you got places out in the reservation, you got places in the North End as well.
In
Out
5:13
I'm dealing with a place in Tiverton, so that would be— and we've had fires out there before too.
In
Out
5:18
Yeah.
In
Out
5:19
All right.
In
Out
5:19
And lastly, you had brought up the 79 development and the increase in population there.
In
Out
5:28
I have had discussions with the mayor's office about a developer-built fire station.
In
Out
5:34
I don't know where that sits now that the state, I guess, announced that they're solely in control of the project.
In
Out
5:41
That's another conversation I'm going to have to have with the mayor.
In
Out
5:45
But I would— I don't know if there's entertainment from or appetite from my fellow councillors, maybe send a letter from the Public Safety Committee to the mayor's office just to keep that— we'll put it in writing and make sure that we entertain it now.
In
Out
6:02
Motion for that, councillor?
In
Out
6:03
I, I actually have one, if you don't mind.
In
Out
6:06
Oh, absolutely.
In
Out
6:06
Yeah, then we can wait.
In
Out
6:07
That's fine.
In
Out
6:07
I'll wait to, uh, to acknowledge you, which I'll do now.
In
Out
6:10
I appreciate you, Mr. O'Regan.
In
Out
6:11
Go ahead, councillor.
In
Out
6:12
Um, so I would like an update on the current status of apparatus.
In
Out
6:15
I know one I saw, I think it was online yesterday or the day before, that the new one is all pretty and ready to get shipped here.
In
Out
6:23
Is that correct?
In
Out
6:24
Is that Ladder 9?
In
Out
6:25
Yes, I believe it's still a month or two out.
In
Out
6:27
Okay.
In
Out
6:28
So what I would like to know is what the status is on the current ordering of apparatus and what the game plan is.
In
Out
6:35
I know the capital improvement plan was put out, but I would like to get a status update on what that is.
In
Out
6:41
I think I'll make a motion at this point to send a letter to the administration, the fire chief, for an update on apparatus ordering and status, where they're at.
In
Out
6:50
And then secondly, any plans on fire— any sort of fire protection when it comes to the development of Route 79 and what that status is as well.
In
Out
7:00
I'll make that in the form of a motion.
In
Out
7:02
Second.
In
Out
7:02
I'll second that.
In
Out
7:04
I know we just had the training division went over there, went to Taunton, because Taunton just built a new public safety complex for the replacement of the Stanley Street station, which is 100 and however many years old.
In
Out
7:18
He did that feasibility study, and the chief may want to see what the feasibility is to do one on 79.
In
Out
7:24
It's sorely needed.
In
Out
7:26
We can't get down there now.
In
Out
7:28
If we have a call, we have to go down anywhere on Duval Street, especially at certain times of the day, it's impossible.
In
Out
7:34
It's a 2-lane road.
In
Out
7:35
If you're going to put that many houses, uh, housing, shops, and whatnot, it's, it's, it's a disaster waiting to happen.
In
Out
7:43
I agree.
In
Out
7:43
It's been at the forefront of a lot of my questions that I've had with the administration, was the 79 and the fire protection.
In
Out
7:52
And if I might add, uh, as far as the trucks go, I, I believe the estimation on ladder trucks right now is 1,600 days.
In
Out
8:00
And that's from the time you order it to the time it comes in.
In
Out
8:04
The new ladder 4 has been plagued with delay, delay, delay, delay, delay.
In
Out
8:08
But even if you ordered every truck, 2 trucks every 2 years, by the time you get to the last truck in the fleet, the trucks at the beginning of the fleet are already starting to age out.
In
Out
8:19
So it has to be— we can't buy them in bulk like we did last time because they all age out at the same time.
In
Out
8:24
And these trucks that we got are horrible.
In
Out
8:26
I mean, I've said it before that we're the kings of low-price lending.
In
Out
8:30
You know, I mean, we just low-bid everything.
In
Out
8:33
And if you buy quality trucks, you pay a quality price, but you get something that works.
In
Out
8:38
Yeah, I think my point is too is that we want to make sure there's a plan going forward that every year, you know, we're looking 10 years out.
In
Out
8:44
We're making sure that we know what trucks are aging out, what we need to order, and not kind of knee-jerking reaction to what we need to get taken care of in in a long-term sense.
In
Out
8:53
So, right, in the interim, we do need reliable spare trucks.
In
Out
8:58
We have Engine 26 that probably shouldn't be on the road.
In
Out
9:03
I just had to address expired inspection stickers with it, and there are a lot of safety concerns, like the seats don't lock.
In
Out
9:09
So when you're driving, your seat slides back and forth, which if, you know, the city had its way, you know, I mean, we would be on donkeys, for God's sakes.
In
Out
9:18
They're unsafe vehicles, but we do what we have to do with what we got.
In
Out
9:21
But it doesn't mean that something's not going to happen, a firefighter get hurt or killed because of these vehicles.
In
Out
9:27
They have standards and NFPA standards for a reason, for truck safety.
In
Out
9:32
These trucks are not safe, even some of the new ones.
In
Out
9:35
We need reliable spares so those trucks can get into the shops and be fixed, and that means we have to have funding, and that means that it has to be more of a I would say a priority put on the fire apparatus as opposed to ambulances, because it seems our shop is filled with ambulances 24/7, and the fire trucks don't even get routine maintenance inspections.
In
Out
9:56
I mean, most of these trucks were out of compliance and voided the warranties within the first 6 months, 3 months, 1 month, because we didn't do what we were supposed to do with those vehicles.
In
Out
10:06
So now you can't go back and complain about the trucks breaking down because we didn't take care of them properly.
In
Out
10:11
So there needs to be a systematic change from the city with the funding and the shops in order to get these vehicles to where they should be.
In
Out
10:17
We wouldn't tolerate a police car, you know, with 3 tires and 1 light, but yet we'll tolerate a fire truck with no sirens and ladders that don't work.
In
Out
10:28
I'm at a loss for why that's acceptable.
In
Out
10:32
Mr.
In
Out
10:33
Chair, if we could as well, can we add to that letter just an update on the turnover year?
In
Out
10:37
As well?
In
Out
10:37
Yes, sir, because that, that was also a conversation we had some months ago, and I know there were some processes going on, but I'd like an update on that as well.
In
Out
10:44
Yeah, I appreciate you guys' support on that too as well.
In
Out
10:46
Yeah, of course.
In
Out
10:47
Motion made.
In
Out
10:48
Yeah, motion so made and seconded by Councilor Canuel.
In
Out
10:51
So it's to send the administration a letter as to a current update status on our apparatus, um, as ordering, ordering and current status of what's been ordered and what plan is going forward, an update on study of Route 79 and how the fire department plays a role in that, as well as an update on the current ordering of turnover gear and where that stands as of right now.
In
Out
11:14
All right, thank you.
In
Out
11:15
Did you get that, Clark?
In
Out
11:17
One other thing, if we could add to that as well, is just some type of— I would like to see some type of communication between the administration and the state showing that there was dialogue opened as far as putting a fire station on this piece of property.
In
Out
11:35
It is a very pertinent situation.
In
Out
11:37
We can't load that area with more residents and have— keep the same trucks, especially after what we're hearing today, and have the same response.
In
Out
11:46
It doesn't make sense.
In
Out
11:47
So if we can add that as well, I'd appreciate it.
In
Out
11:49
So maybe if you guys second on that as well.
In
Out
11:52
Thank you, I appreciate that.
In
Out
11:53
Mr. O'Regan, thank you.
In
Out
11:54
Thank you, sir.
In
Out
11:55
Thank you.
In
Out
11:58
All in favor of the letter?
In
Out
12:00
Aye.
In
Out
12:00
No nays.
In
Out
12:07
Number 2 on the agenda, minutes from June 16th to June 26th.
In
Out
12:11
Motion to approve has been made and seconded.
In
Out
12:13
All those in favor?
In
Out
12:14
Aye.
In
Out
12:14
No nays.
In
Out
12:15
Is there a motion to lift item 3 from the table?
In
Out
12:17
Motion to lift item 3 from the table.
In
Out
12:19
Second.
In
Out
12:20
Item 3, resolution convene with representatives from the MBTA, the City of Fall River, and other interested parties to discuss safety and noise concerns around the commuter rail.
In
Out
12:28
This was tabled on 4/7/26.
In
Out
12:33
All interested parties?
In
Out
12:34
Mayor's office?
In
Out
12:44
Mr.
In
Out
12:44
Chair, do we have a, a representative from the MBTA?
In
Out
12:47
Um, I did receive email correspondence from them stating that they had nothing that was of new importance from the last time they had come down, so they were not coming to this meeting.
In
Out
12:58
Fair enough.
In
Out
12:59
Thank you, sir.
In
Out
12:59
I yield.
In
Out
13:00
Thank you.
In
Out
13:04
Mrs. O'Neill, how are you?
In
Out
13:05
Good, how are you?
In
Out
13:05
Doing well, thank you.
In
Out
13:08
So I know we have entertained this and we have received emails recently, complaints once again about the trains in the North Main Street area.
In
Out
13:18
One of the specific emails was It pertained to idling times, roughly 4:30, 5 o'clock in the morning.
In
Out
13:23
They sit there, which I completely understand.
In
Out
13:26
Have you heard anything back in the mayor's office regarding a plan?
In
Out
13:31
I know they had one in place for noise mitigation.
In
Out
13:33
Have we had any current updates to that?
In
Out
13:36
I mean, I know the last email that we received with a complaint, it was from a resident who had received multiple notifications that they qualified for the hazard mitigation program but didn't take advantage of it.
In
Out
13:49
So the state was going to work with them in that regard to see that they could try to assist them.
In
Out
13:55
When we receive complaints regarding the MBTA, I mean, we send them to the state representative in that district in addition to the individuals from Keolis and from— to Jean Fox.
In
Out
14:07
They've always been very responsive to us.
In
Out
14:11
To handle the concerns that neighbors have.
In
Out
14:13
So we work with them to try to resolve everything that we can that neighbors bring forward to us.
In
Out
14:19
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
14:20
Councillor Cannell.
In
Out
14:22
Thank you.
In
Out
14:22
In the last week, I've had a resident reach out about a horrible sewer smell up near the Weaver's Cove layover station of the North Main.
In
Out
14:31
Really, that— he said it was the whole Steep Brook area of North Main.
In
Out
14:36
And so I don't know if it's related.
In
Out
14:39
Uh, he, he did want me to connect with potentially Keolis or whoever.
In
Out
14:44
He thinks it's related to the train somehow.
In
Out
14:48
So I did want to bring that up as well to be potentially— was that sent to the mayor's office as well, or just yourself?
In
Out
14:54
Uh, this one was an online one, so it hasn't been sent yet.
In
Out
14:57
I did just connect with him, I think, over the weekend.
In
Out
14:59
I said bring it to this meeting.
In
Out
15:00
I mean, I would refer that Mr. Furlan as well so that he could check, have his maintenance crew check in that area to see if there were any issues.
In
Out
15:09
I know that there was a water main break in that area.
In
Out
15:12
I don't know, I'll have to defer to Paul if it went down that far.
In
Out
15:16
I know it was up in the area of the rotary on North Main Street.
In
Out
15:19
I don't believe that it went down as far.
In
Out
15:22
But I mean, if there's an issue, yeah, we'll absolutely look into it.
In
Out
15:26
Okay, so I will get that sent over and let you guys pursue it.
In
Out
15:32
Absolutely.
In
Out
15:34
You also have council?
In
Out
15:35
Yes, thank you.
In
Out
15:36
The one thing— the question I have is, and I've noticed with a lot— some of the issues in the city, it's about the advertising or marketing to the neighbors.
In
Out
15:44
And I understand that they were sent letters or emails regarding this program.
In
Out
15:50
Is there any way to reach out to the MBTA representative and see if we could have a sit-down once again to explain the program, what they offer, and how they're to contact?
In
Out
16:02
I mean, I'm— I certainly can check with Gene Fox, but I know a lot of those things had a time frame to them where people had the opportunity to take advantage of it.
In
Out
16:13
I don't know if those things are still available.
In
Out
16:16
I wasn't aware that there wouldn't be somebody from the MBTA here today.
In
Out
16:20
To be able to answer the questions.
In
Out
16:22
But we can look and see.
In
Out
16:23
For some reason, I believe there was a deadline in which people could apply, and that there would be exceptions.
In
Out
16:29
I mean, of course, if someone never got the, you know, the notifications and things.
In
Out
16:34
Okay, because I can tell you, not pertaining to this situation, but another constituent complaint was the gentleman was emailing me.
In
Out
16:43
But email was new to him.
In
Out
16:44
It was an elderly gentleman in his early 80s.
In
Out
16:48
So my concern is the people down there that may fit into that category as well, where they're not really email friendly or social media friendly.
In
Out
16:58
How can we go there and let them know that this exists so they don't have to suffer through this, you know, the noise and the early morning wake-ups and whatnot?
In
Out
17:07
I appreciate that.
In
Out
17:08
Anything further on the topic?
In
Out
17:09
I got nothing.
In
Out
17:11
Thank you very much.
In
Out
17:13
I'm gonna do a motion to table this.
In
Out
17:17
Yeah, I was just thinking that.
In
Out
17:18
Uh, motion to table for further discussion.
In
Out
17:20
Second.
In
Out
17:20
First and second.
In
Out
17:21
All those in favor?
In
Out
17:22
Aye.
In
Out
17:23
No nays.
In
Out
17:24
Item number 4, resolution convened to address long-standing flooding issues at Stafford Plaza, Pleasant Street, and Quarry.
In
Out
17:32
This was adopted on July 14th, '26.
In
Out
17:36
All interested parties.
In
Out
17:38
Mr. Furlan, good afternoon.
In
Out
17:44
How's it going, councilors?
In
Out
17:49
Paul Furlan, Administrator of Community Utilities for the City of Fall River.
In
Out
17:53
Thank you.
In
Out
17:53
So it's been a little while.
In
Out
17:55
I'm just going to have Kevin Jacob, Project Manager, Community Utilities.
In
Out
17:58
Thank you, Kevin.
In
Out
18:00
So I just want to— I did a PowerPoint presentation for you guys just to kind of update you.
In
Out
18:05
It's been a while since I've been in front of council talking about this.
In
Out
18:08
But we'll start off, we'll run through a little history of the square, history of what we've been doing, and then what the plan is moving forward.
In
Out
18:19
So, so again, just we'll go through an introduction, existing conditions, affected population, the recommended improvements, the cost estimates to date, funding and implementation plan.
In
Out
18:33
So as you can see, uh, from the picture there to the left, Stafford Square has been flooding for a long period of time.
In
Out
18:39
This isn't something new that's come up, uh, you know, or anything.
In
Out
18:45
Does it occur more often potentially because of the intensity of the storms that we get nowadays?
In
Out
18:52
Yeah, uh, you know, that, that could be said.
In
Out
18:56
But you can see that picture's from the 1960s.
In
Out
18:59
So this area, Stafford Square, it's the intersection of Pleasant Street, Quarry Street, and County Street.
In
Out
19:05
It's the low point of a 373-acre highly urbanized area.
In
Out
19:12
So that watershed stretches back as far as Eastern Avenue and Locust Street all the way up to Oak Grove Cemetery.
In
Out
19:19
It takes sewer from beyond there, the President Ave pump station and other areas.
In
Out
19:25
All that sewer comes down through that intersection as well.
In
Out
19:28
You have the shopping plaza to one side, as well as, you know, a supermarket on the other side, large milk complex in the corner.
In
Out
19:39
Right next to this— right next to it, you have Health First, a healthcare facility in the area as well.
In
Out
19:45
So it's a busy area.
In
Out
19:48
Know, Flint, the Pleasant Street running up the Flint.
In
Out
19:51
That's, that's a, you know, once a very bustling and busy economic area, and hopefully will be rebuilt into that, you know, sometime soon.
In
Out
20:00
There's lots of good things going on in that street, and we want to keep that moving forward.
In
Out
20:05
So running right through this intersection, you have what's called the White Brook Tip Tributary.
In
Out
20:11
That's kind of the main culvert that comes through this area.
In
Out
20:15
It was way back before the city was here, White Brook.
In
Out
20:19
It flowed down into the Quicker Sand River.
In
Out
20:22
There's multiple other culverts that also come through this intersection.
In
Out
20:26
A quarry drain from the quarry back up where behind where this small—I still call it the small school—but the school up over there.
In
Out
20:34
You know, there was a quarry, so the quarry drain comes down through this area into the same intersection.
In
Out
20:40
And the area that all this drains out to is out to the Quicker Sand.
In
Out
20:43
So all this stuff was identified in many plans that we've done.
In
Out
20:47
So our stormwater master plan, our hazard mitigation plan, our other, you know, improvement plans that we have.
In
Out
20:59
So we've been looking at this for a while as well.
In
Out
21:03
Next slide.
In
Out
21:04
So again, just to kind of COVID the area, if you look at that map there on the left-hand side, that blue outlined area.
In
Out
21:11
And I know the screen back there is a little squiggly, but, you know, the blue outlined area really gives you a sense of how big this area is and all the drainage that comes down to that one point.
In
Out
21:25
Highly urbanized area, very few green spots.
In
Out
21:28
So you think about that, you got, you know, Columbus Park, and there's not many other, you know, and Lafayette Park.
In
Out
21:38
Other than that, you don't really have a lot of big green spaces, you know, highly compact multifamilies in a lot of these streets that run through this area.
In
Out
21:49
So this is all, you know, a lot of the flooding, and we've been here 1,000 times and talked about it, is undersized pipes, pipes that were put in in the early 1800s.
In
Out
21:59
You know, late 1800s, early 1900s.
In
Out
22:01
They served the purpose at the time for what they needed, but they don't serve the purpose for how the city has grown and built up and become.
In
Out
22:10
You know, wet weather frequencies have changed, and that overwhelms the infrastructure, closes the road, causes service disruptions, and, you know, sanitary sewer overflows that could occur.
In
Out
22:24
So Where all this drains to, it comes down into the intersection.
In
Out
22:29
It actually goes underneath the strip mall plaza there, Flint Village Plaza.
In
Out
22:33
It's actually a channel that goes underneath the center of that building, comes out the back of that building, eventually makes its way down to the Kwikishan River.
In
Out
22:43
From the Kwikishan River, then conveys itself down to Lower Kwikishan, through the 4th Street gatehouse, down through the sluice gates to down at Workout World and out either by Battleship Cove or to Firestone Mill Pond and out by the state pier.
In
Out
23:01
So, I put this slide in here and talked a little bit about it because it talked about in a 1915 report on the Wethupper Ponds and the Quicashan River about the Whitefield— the White Brook culvert.
In
Out
23:17
And it's how it's been causing some floods even back then, back in 1915.
In
Out
23:23
And, you know, it was kind of undersized.
In
Out
23:26
So this was talked about in this report and how it interacted with the Quicashan River and the flow of the Quicashan River out of the city.
In
Out
23:37
So the existing conditions, about 162 stormwater catch basins in the whole entire area.
In
Out
23:44
85 combined sewer catch basins, so that goes into the combined sewer within the drainage area.
In
Out
23:51
There's over 70,000 linear feet of paved street within this encatchment area.
In
Out
23:58
You know, that's a pretty large number if you think about it for streets that are paved 24, 26, 32 feet wide that don't let a drop of water infiltrate in.
In
Out
24:11
The area should really have over 560 catch basins if you were to do it by today's standards to be able to capture all that water in it.
In
Out
24:22
So what we have is going through there is the culvert from White Brook.
In
Out
24:27
We also have the Quarry Street drain, which is a 28 by 36 stone box culvert that runs through there.
In
Out
24:35
Has some connections into it, and the White Brook culvert that runs through there.
In
Out
24:40
So all of that right now can take up to what's called the 2-year storm.
In
Out
24:44
That's really what that can handle.
In
Out
24:49
Next slide.
In
Out
24:53
So existing conditions of the sewer.
In
Out
24:55
So we talked a little bit about the sewer before, that it comes from.
In
Out
24:58
So you have the present pump station.
In
Out
25:00
That's over behind Newport Creamery.
In
Out
25:04
That pump station actually goes— it pumps all that whole entire area, Valentine Street, everything, all that sewer eventually goes down to that pump station, including as far as Diamond, all comes back to that pump station.
In
Out
25:17
And that pump station then pumps up the water into a force main that goes down President Ave., goes down Oak Grove to Oak Grove, and then ties into the sewer.
In
Out
25:28
The sewer eventually makes its way all the way back down through the intersection at Stafford Square.
In
Out
25:36
So again, some of the sewers in there, early to mid-1800s, 15 inches, 24 inches, some of them go up to 48 in some of the flat, low-lying areas.
In
Out
25:49
But, you know, it just shows the extent of even the sewer catch basin and how much further it goes beyond just the water and catchment in this area.
In
Out
26:01
So we talked— I mentioned about the 2-year flood, and I wanted to put this slide in here just a little bit to show you what we do.
In
Out
26:08
You know, this is when we were doing the full hydraulic model and hydraulic study of this whole entire area.
In
Out
26:14
This is kind of what ends up showing us.
In
Out
26:17
So the top left-hand side, you can see So there's a green line, which is actually the surface, you know, ground level surface.
In
Out
26:26
There's a red line below that, and that's what we call the hydraulic grade line as water flows.
In
Out
26:33
The blue is, you know, the actual water as it comes through there.
In
Out
26:38
But so what you really want to do is keep the red line below the green line.
In
Out
26:43
That means that water isn't coming up above the surface.
In
Out
26:46
So in the 2-year storm, the top one, you can see red line stays pretty much below the green line on the upper part of the encatchment.
In
Out
26:54
There's a couple of spots, but the way the hydraulics work and the model works, it all works where it's— where it kind of stays in the pipe.
In
Out
27:00
If you look at the lower one, it gets into— that one gets into it.
In
Out
27:04
I think that's a 10-year storm.
In
Out
27:06
Yeah, that's a 10-year storm on the bottom one.
In
Out
27:09
So that'll show you You know, where that first red box is, moving from the right to left on there, that's the Stafford Square intersection.
In
Out
27:17
So on a 10-year storm, that's where the water level would rise to above the red line that's above the green line.
In
Out
27:26
And then as the hydraulic model goes out, it is— the red line is above the green line, but that typically doesn't come up to the surface in many of those those areas.
In
Out
27:40
So let me talk a little bit— so, you know, we've gone through some studies, and I'll talk in a little bit about a lot of the work that we've already done in this area.
In
Out
27:48
One of the things that we've looked at is the sensitive and vulnerable populations within this area.
In
Out
27:53
This is something that we had to do for some of the grants that we applied for for the work in this area and some of the grants that we applied for in the area.
In
Out
28:01
But it's really census tract 6412 as well as 6413.
In
Out
28:07
Total population of a little bit under 10,000 people, roughly about 10% of Fall River's population.
In
Out
28:14
Mixed commercial and residential, private homes, and there's sensitive populations within, within this area.
In
Out
28:21
High social vulnerability index, that's, that's the rating that they have.
In
Out
28:25
It's a 0.75 out of 1.
In
Out
28:30
So, a couple of the plans that we've done that have looked at this, and, you know, our plans, we always look and we start, and I say we start at 90,000 feet, and then we start coming down, coming down, coming down.
In
Out
28:41
And that's really where we need to get to, to be able to get into design.
In
Out
28:45
So, it goes back to as far as 2011, 2013.
In
Out
28:50
Part of the CSO abatement plan naturally looked at this area because of the impacts that it has with the local urbanized flooding.
In
Out
28:59
Integrated wastewater stormwater master plan, that was completed in 2016.
In
Out
29:04
I call that like the 90,000-foot view.
In
Out
29:07
Then we had a stormwater management plan program that was done in 2019.
In
Out
29:13
Facilities plan, Stafford Square was looked at.
In
Out
29:16
'21 and '22 was really where we got into the nitty-gritty started to get into it in Stafford Square.
In
Out
29:24
That was because of funding that was approved in November of 2017.
In
Out
29:29
There was a loan authorization approved.
In
Out
29:30
A portion of that loan authorization was to do the initial hydraulic study of the Stafford Square area.
In
Out
29:37
So that was funding that we ended up getting to be able to move forward with that.
In
Out
29:42
So that kind of started and kicked this off.
In
Out
29:45
From there, this was all mentioned in our hazard mitigation plans that we've done and And also, there was an economic development and redevelopment plan done for that area along with— it was really the Flint, but that's kind of, you know, a portion of the Flint area.
In
Out
30:02
So Stafford Square was included in that plan in 2024 as well.
In
Out
30:08
So just a little bit about the specifics of the plan.
In
Out
30:13
You know, you can see in there the President Ave area, the Oak Grove area, the Bedford Street area.
In
Out
30:19
Stafford Square upstream area.
In
Out
30:22
You know, this is right from the hazard mitigation plan, uh, labeled out right in there.
In
Out
30:28
This allows us to reach out for certain pots of funding.
In
Out
30:31
Without this being in this plan, it wouldn't allow us to move forward for some, some funding.
In
Out
30:38
The urban renewal plan the city developed in 2024, uh, it, it included about drainage problems, the floodings, you know, it was mentioned multiple times through that whole entire thing.
In
Out
30:52
And that plan had a lot of public outreach when that plan was developed.
In
Out
30:58
So that was taking in a lot of what the public was saying, a lot of what everybody in the area had to say, and implemented into that plan.
In
Out
31:05
So this area was definitely brought up by the public during this time.
In
Out
31:11
So recommendations and improvements.
In
Out
31:13
Current issues, really to control the flooding.
In
Out
31:16
That's what we want to do in this area.
In
Out
31:19
Reduce the runoff, which really includes increasing the pipe sizes.
In
Out
31:25
What we want to try to do is get it to the 10-year storm point, where we can capture that 10-year storm.
In
Out
31:31
You know, everybody says, well, we're going to fix the flooding in this area and it's never going to flood again.
In
Out
31:36
You know, I've been here, every project that we've that we've ever done.
In
Out
31:39
I've, you know, I've said, and my predecessor always said, we're not going to guarantee that it's never going to flood again because, you know, if you get the, you know, 20-inch in 1-hour storm, you know, there's nothing that we could build that, that can do that, you know, handle that.
In
Out
31:56
But what we need to be able to do is handle it so it doesn't impede people's ability on a regular basis to be able to go through that area or enjoy that area.
In
Out
32:08
Next slide.
In
Out
32:10
So this is really where we are.
In
Out
32:12
We're about 35-40% design right now.
In
Out
32:16
The recommended improvements are up on the screen.
In
Out
32:18
So the right-hand side kind of shows you the whole entire watershed.
In
Out
32:22
And I know there's a lot on this slide and on the screen right now.
In
Out
32:26
But all the green lines really are showing the sewer.
In
Out
32:29
The magenta lines are showing the separated drainage in the area.
In
Out
32:34
The left-hand side of the screen really zooms into the areas that we need to improve on.
In
Out
32:40
So what we're going to be doing, what we're proposing, is coming through the backside, the backside of the building.
In
Out
32:48
And sorry, I would be up there pointing, but the screen's too high on the wall for me to be able to reach it.
In
Out
32:54
I like to stand during these presentations, but So really work through the Stafford Square, the whole entire plaza.
In
Out
33:00
We're going to be running a large box culvert, 12 feet by 5 feet, through the parking lot of the plaza there, crossing over through the backside of the old Bank of America, and then crossing, going through the U-Haul parking lot over to County Street.
In
Out
33:19
We're going to be running separate drainage all the way up County Street to to try to encapsulate a lot of that water before it gets down to the intersection.
In
Out
33:27
We're then going to head up North Rowcliffe Street, and with new drainage culverts all the way up and through into Bedford Street.
In
Out
33:36
What we really need to do is get further out into the system, capture this water into a separated drainage pipe, and convey it down and through the intersection so that it's not draining down to the intersection.
In
Out
33:48
Intersection, and not coming— not overwhelming the existing culverts within the intersection.
In
Out
33:55
So we saw the hydraulic grade lines prior.
In
Out
34:00
These are the hydraulic grade lines after the improvements.
In
Out
34:02
So you can see on the 2-year storm and the 10-year storm, the red line's well below the green line.
In
Out
34:09
So this is what's proposed as of now.
In
Out
34:14
So recommended sewer improvements.
In
Out
34:15
Again, CSOs is always something that we always talk about in Fall River, because we're working so hard to reduce the amount of CSO discharge that we have.
In
Out
34:27
This project isn't necessarily a CSO project, but any water, any stormwater that we can get out of the combined system helps us further down the line.
In
Out
34:38
So to say that this is a CSO project, strictly CSO, No, but getting all of this additional stormwater, separating a lot of the catch basins that go into the combined sewer, pulling out of that combined sewer, putting it into the drain lines, will be a benefit for the CSOs overall.
In
Out
35:01
One of the things that we like to do, and we're going to plan on doing on this project, is include green infrastructure into this project.
In
Out
35:09
This is one thing that is definitely, you know, something that's more prevalent now, to be able to use green spaces that will be able to have plants that use the water and clean the water before it goes into the stormwater system and then eventually is discharged into the environment.
In
Out
35:29
It's a very tough area to incorporate a lot of this green infrastructure because of the urbanized city.
In
Out
35:36
So there's different ways that we've been able to modify some of these green infrastructures to be able to work in the city.
In
Out
35:45
Like when on South Main Street near Middle Street, we have tree box filters that run that area.
In
Out
35:51
On Middle Street running down next to the park, we have the bioretention area over there.
In
Out
35:56
You know, some people think that, oh, those are all weeds growing in the middle, but those are specially designed plants to be able to absorb and use the water, rather than have it go into the drainage system, and help clean and filter the water as well.
In
Out
36:10
So, the cost estimate as it stands for this project, as I said, we're about 35-40% design right now.
In
Out
36:17
The estimate is $36 million, almost $37 million for the whole entire project.
In
Out
36:23
So that's construction.
In
Out
36:25
So as it stands right now, we are Uh, fully funded for design.
In
Out
36:30
So we were able to get— we got authorized some money from ARPA from the council, Bristol County ARPA funds that we were able to use to start the design process.
In
Out
36:41
And then we were issued a grant through the MassWorks program to bring it up to 100% design.
In
Out
36:50
So when we're done in about 8 months, we'll have 100% bid-ready documents ready to go for this whole entire project.
In
Out
37:01
Just go back for one second.
In
Out
37:03
So just a little bit on this slide as well.
In
Out
37:07
This is really going to open up, you know, different areas for people to be able to develop, I think, through this corridor and in this area.
In
Out
37:15
One of the things for one of the grants that we applied for, we need to do a cost-benefit analysis based on FEMA's cost-benefit.
In
Out
37:23
So if you look at the bottom of there, so when we did the cost-benefit analysis, you need to be above a 1.
In
Out
37:29
We were at a 1.7.
In
Out
37:30
So that's saying it's going to generate and help over $62 million worth of improvements for this area for the $36 million investment.
In
Out
37:43
So where we're looking for the funding right now, and, you know, I just sat here and told you guys that we need $36 million, but I know we're not going to get $36 million to go into Stafford Square and do this project.
In
Out
37:55
I'm not going to be able to get it from my ratepayers, you know, without— you know, I don't even want to go— so we're tracking down every lead to try to be able to get this funding.
In
Out
38:07
The FEMA Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program, the BRIC program, This is a program that was out— came out probably about 6 or 7 years ago.
In
Out
38:18
There was a couple of rounds of funding that went out.
In
Out
38:21
It is through FEMA, so we apply to MEMA, our local mitigation agency.
In
Out
38:28
They take that, and they— if they approve our project, then they send it to FEMA.
In
Out
38:32
So we applied for BRIC funding, I believe it was 3 or 4 years ago we put in an application.
In
Out
38:38
Application.
In
Out
38:39
It went to FEMA.
In
Out
38:40
It wasn't chosen.
In
Out
38:42
It's a national— it's a national program, so there's a lot of competition out there.
In
Out
38:47
It wasn't chosen, but we got some good feedback from that one.
In
Out
38:50
We put it out.
In
Out
38:51
We applied for it a second time.
In
Out
38:54
That second time was right when, you know, there was a lot of budget cuts that were happening in the federal government, and this program was one of the ones that was cut at that time.
In
Out
39:08
This program did just come back out about 4 or 5 months ago.
In
Out
39:13
We put together a full application again.
In
Out
39:15
We submitted that application.
In
Out
39:17
We're just— I think last week we just worked with MEMA to finalize, make sure everything was good with the application, and they're going to be submitting it to FEMA.
In
Out
39:26
So that's one of the areas that we have.
In
Out
39:29
MassWorks is another one that we have.
In
Out
39:31
You know, if we go through the FEMA process and we get federal funding, they want you to be able to do the whole entire project.
In
Out
39:39
They can't— they're not going to pay for just a portion of the project.
In
Out
39:42
So they won't pay for us to do, you know, Phase 1 or Phase— you know, they want the whole entire thing fixed.
In
Out
39:48
They don't want part of it fixed.
In
Out
39:50
But when you get into some of the other funding sources, like MassWorks funding, we've designed this project where we potentially can break it up into some smaller phases.
In
Out
40:01
So whether it be MassWorks or whether we do it in authorization small steps, take small bites out of it and be able to move forward, we will have the flexibility as we've designed this project to be able to do that as well.
In
Out
40:15
But again, so MassWorks is always a great option.
In
Out
40:19
And then we also have the Clean Water Revolving Fund.
In
Out
40:23
But then again, Again, that requires an authorization.
In
Out
40:25
That's a loan.
In
Out
40:29
So just running through some of the funding that we have applied for.
In
Out
40:33
The BRIC program, we applied June of '26.
In
Out
40:36
Anticipated hopeful award would be winter of '26 into '27.
In
Out
40:41
The MassWorks, again, we did apply this year, again, for a smaller portion of the project.
In
Out
40:46
We'll see how that pans out on the MassWorks.
In
Out
40:50
Scale.
In
Out
40:51
We did put in a— it's going to be, whether it be a BRIC or whether it be a MassWorks, there is going to be a match that will be required, whether it be 10% or 20% of whatever we're funded.
In
Out
41:03
So we did put in an application for the state revolving fund to be able to use their low-interest loan program for that match if we are approved, and we do need a match.
In
Out
41:15
So we'll be ready with that if needed.
In
Out
41:20
And that's kind of my basis— my basic presentation, kind of where we've been, what we've been working on, and what we're looking for for the future.
In
Out
41:30
I appreciate it, Mr. Frollin.
In
Out
41:31
Thank you.
In
Out
41:31
Councilor Kendall.
In
Out
41:33
Thank you.
In
Out
41:35
Thank you for the history.
In
Out
41:36
That was quite insightful.
In
Out
41:38
So it looks like we've had about 7 studies over the last 15 years as I saw it.
In
Out
41:44
You said that we're 8 months away from the current study being complete, the design phase specifically?
In
Out
41:51
Correct.
In
Out
41:52
So I guess my question would be first, once we go out to bid, from the time the bid is awarded, how long would it take to actually be for people to see an improvement?
In
Out
42:03
Well, so we'll have bid-ready documents.
In
Out
42:07
We can't go out to bid till we have funding in place.
In
Out
42:10
If we were to— if tomorrow Brick came in and said, here's your money, go do it, we're looking at about a 3-year construction project.
In
Out
42:23
Okay.
In
Out
42:25
You know, it is a highly impactful construction project.
In
Out
42:28
We've already been in touch with all the property owners within that corridor.
In
Out
42:31
There are easements that are required, which much through the design phase, we are getting those easements set up and in place with those property owners.
In
Out
42:40
So, um, you know, again, once we— we're bid-ready documents, we'll have everything in place ready to go.
In
Out
42:46
We're just going to need the funding.
In
Out
42:48
So then let's talk about the funding.
In
Out
42:49
So there were obviously a lot of variables in play.
In
Out
42:53
Under the best-case scenario, what do you think the local contribution might be?
In
Out
42:56
And under the worst case, uh, what would it be?
In
Out
43:00
So as it stands, if I was to get my— if I was to get, you know, out of all the programs that are out there and I was to get, you know, my dream funding scenario, BRIC would be $20 million, and that's what it's capped at.
In
Out
43:20
The MassWorks program is capped at $5 million.
In
Out
43:24
So they would chip that in.
In
Out
43:28
There is a couple of other small funding sources that we could probably tap into, but I would expect an authorization needed by the city of about $8 million.
In
Out
43:42
And again, I wouldn't say that— I'm not asking for that now, and that's not anything, but that would be if all the balls fell in place and stacked correctly, but there's a lot of moving variables all involved with that.
In
Out
43:57
And that $37 million cost is today's dollars, right?
In
Out
43:59
That wouldn't factor in inflation, given this is probably, you know, 5 years out?
In
Out
44:04
When we built that, we looked at it, we knew we weren't going to be constructing it.
In
Out
44:08
I believe we did it based on 2 years out.
In
Out
44:14
So, meaningfully, though, we're looking at, I think, best case scenario, 4 to 5 years out before we would see any type of improvement for the situation.
In
Out
44:22
For the whole construction project to be completed?
In
Out
44:24
Yeah.
In
Out
44:25
It's a lot of money too.
In
Out
44:27
Without a doubt.
In
Out
44:28
I guess my— I want to pivot to what interim solutions can we potentially deploy?
In
Out
44:33
You know, I think about simple things, maybe like, you know, when railroad trains come by, you know, arms go down.
In
Out
44:41
Have we Have we explored— like, it never ceases to amaze me, you know, how many cars still continue to get ruined trying to drive through that intersection.
In
Out
44:50
Could we not, if we are— I'm sure you guys have sensors and things that you could potentially figure out that, hey, this is about to flood out.
In
Out
44:58
Could we consider temporarily closing down that intersection, you know, so that people don't try and go through it from a safety perspective?
In
Out
45:06
Because then we risk first responders going out trying to rescue them too?
In
Out
45:09
Yeah, no, definitely.
In
Out
45:10
You know, and, you know, I, I've been sitting at that intersection countless numbers of times, uh, you know, blocking the intersection along with, uh, along with my other staff, uh, as well as, uh, police department, uh, and other agencies within the city.
In
Out
45:26
So, um, you know, the tough thing is, is it's tough to predict on these because it's the high-intensity rainstorms very quick.
In
Out
45:35
It comes, it rains, probably within 20 minutes or a half hour after the high intensity stops, the intersection is, you know, back to normal condition.
In
Out
45:45
So it's sometimes a short period, sometimes a long period.
In
Out
45:49
What we do now, if we look— if we predict— if we see where we may be getting high-intensity rainstorms, with our staffing we have available, we'll deploy people to that area to, you know, if it does flood, to block off the intersection.
In
Out
46:05
I know the police department is always a great help if they know something is coming.
In
Out
46:09
Typically, they'll take— they'll bring barriers out to the area, the sawhorse barriers, so that those can be deployed as well.
In
Out
46:18
One of the things that we're just work— that we just are working on, and we're still working on calibrating and maybe moving, We're working with a nonprofit out of Boston, Stone Living Labs.
In
Out
46:31
They're a nonprofit organization.
In
Out
46:33
They have— they do a bunch of modeling and stuff up in the Boston area.
In
Out
46:37
They reached out to us about 6 months ago.
In
Out
46:39
They heard about Stafford Square, and they were really interested.
In
Out
46:43
So they came out.
In
Out
46:45
They're partnered with another organization out of Woods Hole.
In
Out
46:48
They came out and they mounted a sensor.
In
Out
46:50
Actually in that intersection.
In
Out
46:51
We're still working to calibrate that sensor.
In
Out
46:54
It's currently mounted on the mast for the traffic lights.
In
Out
47:00
We're talking whether we're going to move it potentially onto the mast arm that comes out for the streetlights, because it's a little bit more over the area where the flooding starts, to get even an earlier warning.
In
Out
47:12
And then there has been talks of if there is something that we could do.
In
Out
47:18
You know, I think the railroad arms that come down, you know, maybe a bit much, but some type of flashing signs or something prior to that area if the sensor is activated to be able to warn people ahead.
In
Out
47:30
But I gotta tell you, some, you know, sometimes all the, all the times that I've been sitting out there, and I'm out there either, you know, in a, you know, Ford Explorer with blinking lights all over the thing, or I'm in my, you know, my own pickup truck with lights on it, you know, hazards flashing, and the amount of cars that just drive right around you and then drive into the water is astonishing.
In
Out
47:52
Sometimes I wonder what people are thinking.
In
Out
47:55
You know, they see trucks blocking every road into the intersection, then they still drive around you and go in.
In
Out
48:02
You think if you sit in the canoe they'll get the message?
In
Out
48:04
You know, I just don't know.
In
Out
48:07
Sometimes.
In
Out
48:08
Uh, just take me through the ROI a little bit.
In
Out
48:10
Um, obviously, you know, $37 million, again, back to— that's a big number.
In
Out
48:14
Yep.
In
Out
48:15
Even on the city-side portion, your best-case scenario, we're looking at $8 million.
In
Out
48:19
How do we get to $63 million rounded in potential benefits?
In
Out
48:24
Yeah, so that's, uh, that's an interesting thing.
In
Out
48:27
And again, that's a cost-benefit— that's, it's a benefit-cost analysis, uh, program that FEMA has for their projects.
In
Out
48:34
And there's a lot of things that play into that.
In
Out
48:37
Plays into the miles that people need to detour around on legal roadways.
In
Out
48:42
A lot of times people end up cutting through the parking lot, but that's not a legal roadway to be able to detour around this intersection when it's closed.
In
Out
48:51
It takes into losses within, within the intersection that are caused.
In
Out
48:56
It takes into effect you know, the healthcare facility and rerouting out of that healthcare facility.
In
Out
49:04
And this is Health First I'm talking about behind the plaza there.
In
Out
49:08
That's actually considered a healthcare facility within the cost-benefit analysis, as well as the commercial inconvenience in that area.
In
Out
49:17
You know, those are a lot of the things, and it's a, you know, it's a very sophisticated you know, format to be able to put into it.
In
Out
49:27
All the documentation and backup that we provide within to, uh, to build the whole entire benefit-cost analysis gets scrutinized by MEMA as well as FEMA for, for that.
In
Out
49:39
And what, what's the ROI period?
In
Out
49:41
How many years did you guys use for that?
In
Out
49:43
Uh, we didn't, we didn't run out the number of years on the ROI.
In
Out
49:46
So when we're saying $62.5 million, that's $62.5 million benefits back in 10 years, 25, 50.
In
Out
49:52
It's got to be a number to that, tied to that.
In
Out
49:54
Yeah.
In
Out
49:55
Um, maybe if you can get back to me on that.
In
Out
49:57
Yes, I will.
In
Out
49:58
All right, thank you.
In
Out
49:59
I yield.
In
Out
50:01
Thank you, Councilor Canuel.
In
Out
50:02
Councilor Raposo.
In
Out
50:03
Yeah, my only question, I actually— it's for, it's for, uh, the Chief of Police.
In
Out
50:09
I guess to Councilor Canuel's point, if we know that there is an anticipated forecast of where it's going to be significant, is there a process that automatically takes place as far as automatic blocking of the street?
In
Out
50:23
So to Paul's point, yes, we have deployed sawhorses over there.
In
Out
50:30
But I was just commenting on yesterday's storm, it was like the perfect staggering of extreme water that allowed it to maintain it.
In
Out
50:37
But typically in a storm when it's that bad, we'll either limit our calls to priority only, only for the safety of our officers responding.
In
Out
50:45
And then we deploy police officers over there and then have the assistance of his staff to help block that intersection off.
In
Out
50:52
Unfortunately, you know, common sense can't be taught in a rainstorm and even in a snowstorm.
In
Out
50:57
So it's one of those things that our guys know that the dispatchers will send them out there to shut it down, and it becomes instinctual.
In
Out
51:06
We had that crazy one a few months ago where we had Columbus Park area was flooded.
In
Out
51:10
So that entire area, as you saw highlighted, was pretty much impassable.
In
Out
51:16
For the record, Chief, can you just introduce yourself?
In
Out
51:18
Yeah, I'm sorry, J.T.
In
Out
51:19
Hoare, Chief of Police.
In
Out
51:20
Thank you, Chief.
In
Out
51:20
Yeah, that pretty much answers my question.
In
Out
51:23
I mean, I think I'll ask one more actually.
In
Out
51:26
As far as the detours that are set up for that, is there a— is there like a set map or plan of where the detours are set up?
In
Out
51:32
It when it floods?
In
Out
51:34
Because it's been so unexpected, it's really just to try to keep the cars from trying to navigate it, causing a bigger issue.
In
Out
51:41
There were a couple tow trucks that were staged in that area over the storm yesterday, kind of waiting in lieu of something possibly happening.
In
Out
51:49
Luckily nothing did happen.
In
Out
51:50
I mean, those are the only things, but if a car is stuck and the water's above the kick panels, then a tow truck's not going to try to pull them either.
In
Out
51:58
So typically, you know, in catastrophic situations where it's flooded as high as where Popeyes used to be, we just have to make sure that the person's safe in the car and try to get them out if we need to.
In
Out
52:11
But over the course of about an hour, it really goes down pretty quickly once it catches up.
In
Out
52:16
Fair enough.
In
Out
52:16
Thank you, Chief.
In
Out
52:17
And Mr. Furlan, thank you for the presentation.
In
Out
52:20
Would it be possible to get a copy of that to the clerk?
In
Out
52:22
Yes, definitely.
In
Out
52:23
Sorry.
In
Out
52:23
I was touching it up just before, but I'll let her— That's fine.
In
Out
52:26
Thank you, Chairman.
In
Out
52:27
I yield.
In
Out
52:31
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
52:32
So Councilor Canuel and, uh, yourself have brought up signage.
In
Out
52:38
I think when I go down south in the summertime, you drive down 95, there's signage that is lit up or not lit up that says bridge freezes during winter months, use caution.
In
Out
52:53
For now, and I'm looking at these numbers, I know that's your best-case scenario is $20 million, $5 million, but we have to be realistic too.
In
Out
53:02
And then to get the difference on that from the city is— we don't have 8 cents, never mind $8 million, just to be completely honest.
In
Out
53:11
So in the meantime, we have to, in my opinion, come up with some type of proactive measure to make sure that these cars aren't getting stuck any longer.
In
Out
53:20
What I mean by that is, like I believe you just said, and I'll put it in my own words, we can't teach common sense.
In
Out
53:29
You can't do it.
In
Out
53:30
So when there's 3.5 feet of water in an intersection, and people are going around emergency vehicles, yellow flashing lights and getting stuck.
In
Out
53:38
Now, if we set a precedent where we're putting signage in advance.
In
Out
53:42
Doesn't even have to be a rainy day, but just telling people this is the intersection that floods.
In
Out
53:47
Now we get on the business, the ownership of the plaza, and tell them you got to put up some signage so the obstruction of the roadway stops.
In
Out
53:57
Because like you guys just said, within a half hour it depletes and it's no longer an issue.
In
Out
54:03
What the issue is, is the motor vehicles that are left behind and we're waiting hooks and everything else to get them out of there.
In
Out
54:10
Is there a way— and I don't like recommending this, but sometimes you have to teach common sense— we put up flashing signs, we let them sit there for a while.
In
Out
54:19
I'm sure it's something we can direct from here, right, to traffic to entertain for the signage.
In
Out
54:25
And then we wait a period of time.
In
Out
54:27
And then is there a way to fine these people that just decide to drive their motor vehicles into the 3.5 feet of water and tie up city services.
In
Out
54:37
I think that's a slippery slope.
In
Out
54:38
I think there's a lot of distractions in that intersection with the amount of traffic that's over there.
In
Out
54:43
So you can put as many signs up as you want and make them shoot fireworks out the top.
In
Out
54:48
It's— people sometimes drive just beyond the tip of their nose.
In
Out
54:51
So starting to fine for it, I would say that that's something that I'm not comfortable with, that because it's an unexpected expected thing.
In
Out
54:59
I think there's been vehicles that got stuck there because they were traversing it and the water was actually coming up faster than they could get across.
In
Out
55:08
So, um, again, I think it's a common sense thing.
In
Out
55:11
Uh, at the end of the day, because of its unexpected nature and it's linked to Mother Nature, we kind of have to deal with the problem as it exists.
In
Out
55:21
Yeah, it's unfortunate because I like like yourself.
In
Out
55:25
I like answers now, and I'm looking at pictures that you provided from 1915.
In
Out
55:32
Now, I'm a city historian.
In
Out
55:33
That's not something— you know, I love the city, I love its history.
In
Out
55:37
I don't love that.
In
Out
55:38
Correct.
In
Out
55:39
Neither do I. Yeah.
In
Out
55:40
So at some point, we have to have an honest conversation.
In
Out
55:44
Either this is going to get done quickly or it's not, and there has to be a funding source.
In
Out
55:51
So that's, you know, set aside for this so we could do it little by little over the course of time.
In
Out
55:57
We can't say that we're going to rely on $8 million from the city because I'm telling you, you're not going to find it.
In
Out
56:03
So there has to be some plan in place as far as that piece.
In
Out
56:07
Maybe the administration can put money aside little by little to kind of build a nest egg to get this done.
In
Out
56:14
But to sit here and tell the people that— and it's no fault of your own either of you, but there is no immediate rectification for this.
In
Out
56:21
It's going to keep flooding, and all we can do is keep telling the people, please don't drive and put your vehicle in 4 feet of water.
In
Out
56:28
We don't want to have to— I remember a few years ago, I think it was, we deployed Marine One to that intersection to pull some person out of a vehicle.
In
Out
56:36
Like, at some point, there has to be a common sense approach to this.
In
Out
56:40
I'm not the fine you kind of person.
In
Out
56:43
But we have to have some solution to keep these vehicles out of there.
In
Out
56:47
Um, I don't know, I'm lost for a solution here.
In
Out
56:51
I don't know if there really is one at this point.
In
Out
56:54
Yeah, no, it's very tough.
In
Out
56:57
And again, you know, we've talked a little bit about funding it, and, you know, a lot of the— this funding would be essentially going back to the sewer and the sewer rate and the stormwater fee.
In
Out
57:08
You know, that's where I believe this funding should be made from.
In
Out
57:12
So not the general fund side.
In
Out
57:14
But again, that's up to everybody to figure out.
In
Out
57:17
But, you know, I think stormwater— most stormwater and sewer issues have been funded through there.
In
Out
57:22
Okay, this is definitely a conversation that's going to have to be tabled, in my opinion.
In
Out
57:27
And so, yeah, further conversations with the mayor's office.
In
Out
57:30
So with that motion made and seconded, all those in favor?
In
Out
57:33
Aye.
In
Out
57:33
I, I appreciate your time, gentlemen.
In
Out
57:35
I do.
In
Out
57:36
Thank you very much.
In
Out
57:37
Thank you.
In
Out
57:37
Motion to adjourn.
In
Out
57:38
Motion to adjourn has been made and seconded.
In
Out
57:40
All those in favor?
In
Out
57:41
Aye.
In
Out
57:42
No nays.
In
Out
57:43
Have a good night, everybody.
In
Out
57:44
Thank you.
In
Out