3.19.2025 Traffic Board

All right. Pursuits of open meeting law. Any person may make an audio or video recording of this public meeting or may transmit the meeting through any medium.

Attendees are therefore advised that such recordings of transmissions are being made whether perceived or unpersceived by those present and are deemed acknowledged and permissible.

Start off with a roll call. Lieutenant D for police department. Stephanie MacArthur, director of traffic and parking. Natalie Melo. Heleno. John point. Okay. Um, take a motion to approve the minutes for last month, February 19th meeting. Motion to approve. Seconded by John. Any opposed?

Seeing none. Passed. Is there anybody here that is not on tonight's agenda for citizen input? Everyone received a letter to discuss something that's on the agenda.

Okay. Get into uh All right. No curb cuts. Beautiful. Uh miscellaneous requests table from last month. We have Quickan Street. the traffic uh residents um requesting quickan be made a oneway.

Yes. Okay. Is there anything you want to address the uh board with?

In addition to my request, I do have some pictures here if you guys didn't get out visit the location yourself. No.

So, um this one was just for the board's recollection. We uh talked about this last month. Um it was brought up residents are concerned about um traffic and potential accidents or what was called uh close calls on QuickSan Street. Um so they wanted to manipulate some of the traffic pattern along Quigashan at County Street. Um we discussed a couple of different options.

Uh one of them being possibly making Quashan a oneway uh flowing would that be south?

North. Did you want to make it to Pleasant North? No, because we wanted to. So, right now the concern was the vehicles coming out of Quicoan into that already tight bottlenecked area on County Street. We wanted to leave the traffic on County. So, it would have been making uh Quashana a oneway going south from County. So, it can't go onto county where that choke point was and the um potential uh traffic hazards are

along county. Um, we entertained a couple of different things. After discussing with the fire chief, he had made a uh a request uh pretty much it's it's a public safety issue for the uh fire apparatuses.

Steph, do you have that handy? Yes. Yep.

Uh, so we had a I had a conversation with the fire chief and this is actually for both oneways which we'll have that discussion on the other oneway request as well. Um, as per our conversation earlier today regarding the proposed one-way changes to Kokashan Street and Pine Street, I have the following concerns from a public safety standpoint. Kokushan Street is very difficult turn for apparatus to make

from county onto Kokushan. I would ask that if a oneway is necessary, it should be from Pleasant to County.

So, um, to alleviate the potential hazards along County Street, what we were looking at doing was making Quicoan a oneway from County out to Pleasant.

That would have stopped the flow of traffic into that tight left or right onto County Street and alleviate the issues potentially on County. Fire department is saying that that is um not going to be applicable due to their apparatuses having to get around that area. And I would concur. Um, I didn't take that into account originally for them trying to move an engine or a ladder truck from County onto Quicoan

Street. They just would never make that turn. So, the only other way we could possibly address it is by going northbound like John just mentioned. But if we do that, all that does is change the traffic pattern on QuickShan. It will not alleviate the choke point at county whatsoever. So, it would be my recommendation due to fires um safety concerns that that traffic pattern does not change at all along Quicken Street.

Yes, if I may, please. Um if the traffic pattern does not change, may I make a suggestion that there be no parking at the um the bottom of that street?

Because a lot of that traffic happens because one day you have that store there that has the traffic that people time to quickly go out a quick street to try and get into that parking lot that they have. But then you also have where it deposits onto County Street, you have at the end of that area, you have these vehicles that are parked here. And I have a couple of pictures that show that

vehicles on a two-way simply can't get past there with the vehicles being there with this traffic depositing from Quickan onto County Street. If you have larger vehicles, it then becomes a oneway situation. The cars coming from Pleasant Street have to wait. The cars coming from Quashian Street have to wait as illustrated in this picture. So where would you propose that there would be no

parking from what to what? So there I believe this is 210 Street. This building here right next to the store. Mhm. that whole area in in front of that building. I would So you're you're requesting the prohibited area on County Street or Quashan Street?

Sorry, County. County. Okay. Yeah, because there is a no parking here at a corner already on Quashan at County, but unfortunately people don't abide by it, but we do go by there and tag throughout the day. But there is um no parking here to corner already on Quukushan. So I just wanted to confirm that you weren't requesting just additional footage to that on Quashan. I didn't see where I'm

um asking for no parking and there's no change um that it be in front of that building because when there are vehicles there again it prohibits Can you would you mind um bring those pictures? Being able to pass by um and I also have pictures of property that was damaged due to some of this traffic. Thank you.

And I also wrote some notes there.

Pedestrians, there's a blind spot there coming off of Quickan Street. So, pedestrians um I often see like the kids are, you know, dodging cars. I seen a woman with her children coming from the Assad park yesterday almost got hit by a vehicle coming from Quashan Street depositing on to county.

So, that side of county is prohibited.

So, she's requesting it here. cuz this side it is prohibited already which looks like it's a picture of the building. Yeah. Yeah. So I think she's requesting in front of this whole property. Oh.

Does that property have off street parking? Yeah. I think it does.

So right there. Yeah. is essentially so just where it spills out across into uh you're looking at basically a three four length parking space in front of where Shan would spit out onto there like three cars there. Yes, that area right there really makes it difficult to turn.

And if you can if you see in the picture with the Amazon truck when it's turning it's off it's it is on the curb. And that's usually what happens even when I'm turning on to County Street. There's not enough room. There's vehicles parked in those that three four parking space.

So the vehicles that are coming from county on down to Pleasant are over a bit which makes it difficult.

So where should we on the sidewalk because it's just prohibited. We don't have to. Um I think that's a very good um compromise to help alleviate this considering we can't change the traffic pattern for for obvious fire safety reasons. Um we could do from that convenience store that would be west to the end of that corner of uh what that property is.

So basically as you're coming out of QuickSishan directly in front of you from the convenience store all the way to that corner would be prohibited parking and uh hopefully that would alleviate it but I see no issues with uh making that a prohibited parking section. Um they would lose a handful of parking spots but I believe that giant building has uh resident parking behind it so it shouldn't be that big of an

issue. Um, I would entertain a motion from the board at this point. Motion for private department.

Second. Second. Any opposed?

Seeing none. So, that's what we'll do.

Um, we'll get out there within the next 12 weeks or so and they'll measure and put up the signage. So, as you're coming out of Quickishan Street directly across the street, Wrong County, the north side would be prohibited park.

Okay. Thank you. Thank you. And I'll have motion to deny the one way.

Yes. Is there a second for that? Second.

Second by John. Any opposed? Seeing none.

Okay. All right. Next we have the veterans association uh for Pine Street and Robersonson Street Cberry making that one way. Yes sir. Hello. All right.

Uh so this one kind of had the same issue. Originally you guys were looking for westbound one way again. Steph has a letter she'll read uh from the fire department. So to continue on from my last email, Pine Street is used by my apparatus frequently to access the neighborhoods east of Robeson. I would prefer the one way to be in an easterly direction from Seabberry to Robeson.

Why is there only parking on one side of the street? That's wide enough. We're going to Well, with it being with it being a two-way with it being a two-way right now, it is prohibited. Stay a two-way and allow parking on both side because it's wide enough.

I think it should stay it should stay two-way.

I not it's if you're parked on both sides, it essentially becomes because you can't cross cars can't cross, you know, coming at each other.

So if it's if it's fine. Yeah. As long as it's a oneway pass.

So you would be amendable to this being a oneway going eastbound instead of westbound. Correct, sir. All right. So, what's the what's the rationale for the one way anyways?

Why was it originally proposed? Yeah.

Does anyone want to speak to your original proposal? Uh, yes, I can. Uh, so at the veteran center, we've got a lot of veterans that are coming to pick up food and um with parking on on one side of the street, it it fills up fast, so they start parking on on the second side. So essentially, if we make it a oneway, it would open up parking on both sides of

the street. I I get the I get the rationale on that, and again, I'm all and and I respect every veteran. Um, but to do a oneway, and I believe they open around what 8:00 in the morning, like whatever time they do, and they start getting busy around 10:30, 11, and they close about 4. I I'm not understanding why we would do it one way just to I I wouldn't want to use the word

please, but just to please the the the that one building just for six hours and just keep that street one way permanently. I just I don't see the rationale on that.

Absolutely. I'm reasonable. Uh so urgently anybody can come in here and make a request for traffic patterns.

It's predominantly based around parking and the only way that we can open up as just discussed two-way parking well both sides parking on that street is if we did go down to one way. So that's why that was originally discussed. But I mean these are all things we have to take in consideration if it's not I mean things we look for is if it's going to cause a safety problem or more of a

traffic hazard because I'm just looking at it. The traffic over there is is is is can be even bothered over there. Not only you got the store up front on on the on the the beginning of Pine and Roberson, but then you got the building on the side of them where they have big mounds of big trucks that come out of there every single day. And that in itself can be, you know, a pain just

trying to get out of out of in those um that building. Mhm.

Um my only thinking is maybe, you know, if they want to compromise, you know, I'm sure they know the people that go in and in and out of that building, maybe they can do maybe a for a formula where they go off of the last socials of, you know, to eliminate a lot of the traffic where they can go off of people's socials. They hear a sign for this day,

that day, this day, and eliminate a lot of the traffic.

I I just think there's just too much cause and then there's times that there's no cause and then there's times there's there's so many cause so I I just don't think one on one way is is relevant. Are you a resident on that? Yes. I live on the corner of Pine Rose. Could it be just a certain section? So when we talk about you know there's no parking spots

and and and people have to walk you know to the you know to the veteran center and all that. So there's sometimes that we have to walk on the top of Rugles and then we have to walk, you know, all the way to the Yeah. I I was led to believe that the one resident that was in that section was uh on board with this original proposal. I I assume I was misinformed. You're the one resident

that's on that section. Listen, I'm not trying to be a secretary and everyone's entitled to their opinion here and it's all discussion. Speak freely. I that that's that and again I have to definitely agree with Helen on this but that that street is just too narrow to to to have all that all that you know congested over there. So that was the exact point and reason for the request is because the street is narrow and

there's a lot of congestion. So I go over there often um to visit that center as a as a veterans agent right for the city. Uh, and one of the things that I've noticed is that at that corner that you're that he's speaking of, there's about three vehicles that hardly ever move in that corner, right in that little space right across from the gas station before you get to being right by

the park. So, there in lies a problem right there. There three or two or three vehicles that don't move. Um, and then you have the vet center directly across from the park. Now, there's not supposed to be parking on both sides, but it happens. Um, and when it does happen, doesn't matter which way you're coming from, you have to move out of somebody else's way in order to get down that

street. Period. Point blank. So, that was the main reason for the request. On top of the fact, like you spoke to earlier, there are veterans and and spouses and things like that that come to take advantage of the services. It's more than just food. Um, but they come to take advantage of the services there at the center. And then you have those majority of which are elderly. Okay? So,

you have those folks now, especially with the uh parking tickets that have often gotten issued down in that direction. You got people that can't afford the parking tickets that come along with trying to get the services at the center. They're open more than 4 hours a day. Okay. They crack the door sometimes at 4 uh excuse me, at 9:00 in the morning and on some days they're open till 6. Mhm. Okay. So there's

services and and and things that go on throughout the day, but in order to make it a little bit safer for everybody that's in the area, that was the reason for the request. I literally was just there yesterday and at some point today.

And it is it's a hard piece of street to try and traverse when there's parking on both sides, vehicles coming from every direction. The last thing I want to see is an elderly person just trying to go get what they need get into some kind of situation on that street. Sir, uh before I open this up for a motion from the board, is there anything else either either party would like to say?

We heard a little bit from both sides of contention. Sir, I I own the property on the corner of Fine and Robson. That's good with and um if it's the purpose is to open up more parking spaces. I agree with the with the one way one way direction because that's that's the purpose of creating more parking spaces. So you own that that Yeah, I don't really think I would I would like to see that own west

roads instead of east roads because that corn over here is very dangerous. The corno pine and Robson there's a lot of accidents over here. It would be less cars coming a lot out of I'm going into Robersonson in that way they were going and go go west. Um that that's my that's my original request. Yeah, I understand and that was the original proposal but obviously in light of the fire chief's

recommendation. Uh I will always defer to public safety um regarding these these matters. So it would be my recommendation to the board that the westbound direction is is not on the table. um due to the fire apparatus. So the so the only other um two recourses we have well I guess technically three one of them being less desirable is we make it parking on both sides which I think everyone the board and everyone in

attendance agrees that just adds to the traffic congestion and isn't the most recommended course of action. Uh the other one would be we do go one way in an easterly direction which would spit us out to Robersonson. And then the third option would be unfortunately the traffic pattern stays as is and we got to try to figure out some other possible recommendation or um way to make all

parties uh satisfied. So So the proposal is to come into Seabberry and out or was that the original go into Seabberry and onto Robes? Nope. The original was from Robersonson to Cabberry. So, so if we're coming in up or down Robson, we can go into Pine. That was the original. That was the original. Correct. But unfortunately, based on the fire chief's recommendation, I would recommend to do

it that way as well. You know, go into Robison, you know, and then yeah, it would eliminate the the traffic flow going into mine and out Robinson to eliminate a lot of that a lot of those accidents. Correct. that I sure that I filed, you know, with with public safety already on that. So, that'll eliminate that that problem. But like I said, I just don't see the rationale for it to be. Um

because again, they're there till 4:35 some, you know, sometimes 6 and they go go home and then it just remains a oneway and 44.

It just it doesn't make sense to me.

Anyone from the board? I have a question. Go ahead, honey. Go ahead. So, now we have this driveway there at the vet center. Just hear me out. Um, there's a driveway there. It's pretty big and you have a pretty back yard.

Doesn't that help in any way? Uh, so no.

So, I'm in that area, too, so I know what you're talking about. And I just I just had a conversation about this. The the parking lot that's behind the vet center, that's not ours. That's part of me. So, so you don't use it at all? No, we can't use that's Mer's parking lot behind us. I'm talking about the building behind the vet building. So, you got you got gates. You got the

driveway. Then you got gates that closes correct the back to the front. That section behind those gates. Oh, on the side. Correct. There's five parking spots right because I know there was a trailer there that trailer's on the far side on the other side of Right. Because Yeah.

But in you drive through the gates and and there's five apartments and I have 100 veterans come through the door a day. John, you're going to have another issue there. That Sacred Heart building, I think, is going to have over 40 apartments. And uh that parking if it's if it's heading uh easterly in the easterly direction uh I don't think it's right can benefit those people those residents because you're

going to see 40 more cars. So it's it's that that's going to add to the problem.

Go ahead. People are going to park on that street. I mean that park on Pine Street if it's too hot and two parking once it's two-way parking. So once it's made a oneway it'll be it'll be parking on both sides.

Does anyone else have anything to add to this conversation?

So if you think it's bad now it might just get worse.

All right. So, um, I don't understand. I don't understand how they make it better. It'll make it better if it's a one way then, right? But I'm saying one side. So, you can park on both sides.

That's going to make more parking spots.

So, it'll make more sense to make that a one way going eastbound. That would be a benefit. You're going to get 40 people and then you're going to get the them that that's, you know, they're about a good 50 60 cars. And then if you if you add that 40, you're looking at overund some cars that are going to go onto that street, right? And you're gonna have any parking, right? How was that project

approved on on on that on that church based on street parking? That's that's a different question, but they should have That's a different board.

That's why I say I just I So we're going to be helping you guys, but at the same time, we're helping them. So that means you're probably going to lose out.

That's why I say maybe, you know, that there can be a formula because they do go in and out. They know who their people are. They can try to compromise and figure out by by last names or by, you know, socials, you know, to eliminate a lot of that traffic, you know, and and get a memo out to their to the vets and let them know about a new strategy. All right. Um, if no one has

anything new to add and the board has no questions at this point, I'll entertain a motion if there is one. I got a motion to leave it the way it is. So, a a motion to deny. Move to deny.

Is there a second or discussion amongst the board?

So, Chief Bacon had said that was the best way. Eastbound. Eastbound. Eastbound.

Correct. Going to towards Robson. Roberson with two with with parking on both sides. Right. Then now like that gentleman brought up how we're going to have the church now there's going to be at least 40 apartments there. Okay. So now they're going to be taking away the tra the parking from them. So what do you do then? So this is a toughy for me.

It is anyway but they're going to take because we're going to help them and then those people are going to come in and they're going to take it away from them. So what do you do? They're going to want to change it again. What we do is keep eyes on this original proposal. I understand potentially going to be a problem with that new housing. However, it is not there now. Best we can do is deal with

the problem in front of us. So, there is a request to transfer traffic one way east is the only option or leave it as is. So, no vote. We have a motion on the table to leave as is. Is there a second?

I don't know yet. I don't know what to do. I don't know yet. Seeing none, is there any other motion to be had at this point?

Could we have a section with signs just for the vets to come and park from one certain time to another like part of of that street?

There is veteran parking over I'm trying guys in that section. Now cars can't cross. Right. On the opposing side, you're saying were you talking on the opposing side, Natalie, or on the on the side of the of the center? So, yes, right now there is veteran only parking there. Right. How big is it? Is it long?

I haven't gone by. Oh, you just do a six hour parking or a seven hour parking and that's it. And not not make it a one light. You can get three vehicles there.

Seven hour parking. I'm saying the whole entire length of the whole entire, you know. Yeah. But that's going to hurt my wife because my wife's got her business there of Pine Street. She's been there for over 20 years. Right. Her clients, I'm there sometimes and all I hear is her clients complaining about the pocket. Especially, you know, you know, during the, you know, the baseball games

at the park, it gets even worse. True.

So, to me, I think the best option, make that a one way and that's going to make more pocket spots.

That's my opinion. I mean there not meaning to use the terminology spitball in here, but you decided I mean just being real about it cuz it's clearly nothing else was thought about when it came to the the 40 apartments or whatever it is that's coming up. Sure.

To you have to know that those people are not going to try and park on the street up there by the church where it's already inundated with parking issues.

They're going to filter down towards the vet center absolutely in the park to attempt to find parking for themselves.

And let's be real, everybody's not going to work, right? So, it's going to be cars coming one way or another. We remove the sidewalk. No, we can't do that. Get it to the push it back to the grass and open up the street that way.

Maybe you have a resolution, but that's way bigger. That's totally totally unsafe.

uh pedestrian safety passage and encroach into the parks department which is their property. Technically what could be done is there's a walking path that trails on the back side of rugles towards those properties and curves into the into the uh um the sidewalk. You reroute that walking path when it gets closer to where the concrete normally would meet and you put it you push the

sidewalk back to the grass and reroute the walking path down that way. Well done. Yeah, that's another board as well. Yeah, we get into the parks. I don't have the ability to just encroach into the uh far um parks.

Um all right, so to get back to where we are, there was a motion made. It was not seconded. That being said, is there another motion to be made?

This is why you guys get paid the big bucks. Oh, yeah. I I think on the on the side of caution, you just had a a terrible fire at 386 Locust. that apparatus has to get through no matter what. We at first thought that was the best pattern because uh I know what you're talking about Roberson and Pine that corner is brutal and it's it would make sense just to push the traffic keep

going through but the with the fire department saying that's not the best way. We have to give that some considerable weight too. So I don't have a problem with that. I mean if you're going to go east that's fine but I prefer to go west. Yeah. I I think we I think we all thought that way. I think it was some of the best. But I I do like

the fact of opening up the parking cuz I have seen many many many many accidents with. I do I know the girls still play softball there and that's uh you got guys coming both ways and it's very uh difficult to cross that. So if you only have to look that one way, it'd be easier. So I I hesitant a little bit, but I I would make a motion that according to the fire

chief of air on that caution to improve the parking to make it the one way from Cabberry to Roberson. So there's a motion on the table to make I'm sorry, where are we at? Pine Street a oneway eastbound. Is there a second?

So it'll be parking on both sides.

Correct. I would open up parking on both sides.

Guys, I want to make everybody happy, but well, it's just the way it's going to be then. Come on. I'm going to have to do that if we do decide. Yeah, I mean, I just would like to put out there's Listen, this is tough. This is not um etched in stone. Okay, there is this is very easily something that could be done. I don't want to say trial basis because when if we move forward with

this, it would be instilled. But if it turns out to be that it's not beneficial or it's causing more traffic problems or anything of the like, this is a very simple solution where someone would have to come in, fill out the paperwork, and request that the traffic pattern be adjusted back to the way it was or a different thing. Okay, that's that's the beauty of of these boards. Okay.

Um, pretty much anything is is done on a trial basis, you know. I mean once it is established if it doesn't work out we can always come back and revisit it. Um so there's there's that to consider as well. It has happened before where the YMCA is we have to change that a few times. So it right you know so it can be done like Lieutenant was saying we can

try it. If it works it works. If it doesn't So there's a motion on the on the table right now. Um traffic eastbound parking on both sides.

Correct. Is there a second? Second.

Seconded by Natalie. Uh, any opposed?

Helen. One. Helen. Motion

passes. All right. So, that'll take about another 12 weeks or so for all this to get established and be put into practice. Okay.

Uh Lindo's Cafe. Hello. This was table from last month. Oh, yes. Okay. Uh, so we went out there. Steph had her people go out and do some measurements. Um, it's my recommendation that along that curve there. Uh, as it is now a the whole section is no parking. We can actually condense the no parking section just to that curb which was 105 ft. Yep. 105 ft from the curb to Dean Street. That would be the no

parking. Nope. That would be parking allowed. Yep. And then this would stay prohibited because of that. So remember how we were talking that curb right there um if there was parking there would also be another natural choke point. I didn't want to just go ahead and allow parking along the curve. Um but what we can do is create an additional 105 ft worth of parking by removing some of the no parking sign as

is. So that's that's um my recommendations to the board. They're going to make a motion and vote on it.

Um but that's kind of where we're at based on the traffic study. Okay. So uh that being said, is there a motion to modify the no parking along Alden Street to grant another 105 ft worth of parking? Motion to approve. Second.

Helen and then Natalie said, "What is this?"

Amity Street. Amity Street. Amity Street. This was tabled already.

Is there a motion? Motion to dismiss. Is there a second? Second. Second. And any opposed?

Uh, Middle Street Tractor Trail is on Middle Street. This was also tabled. Is there a motion? Motion to dismiss. Second.

Any opposed? None. Dismissed.

Uh, Annie Market, 1090 Pleasant Street.

1090 Pleasant Street. Beautiful. Making it easy. This was tabled already. Motion to dismiss. Seconded by John. Any opposed? None.

Dismissed. All right.

Uh, we have here um Blossom Road, Yellow Hill Road, Indian Town Road. No parking there. Yep. So I'll just take the baseline. So this was put forth um from the committee health and environmental affairs for a meeting that was held on February 18th. Um we have discussed this prior and it was denied. Um I did go down there just to get some measurements based on this request from the health

and environmental affairs. Um it would be 60 to 80 feet of each side on Blossom Road and Indian Town Road. Um but I know you had went down there and did a study so I don't know if you want to touch base on that. Um, I had several units go down there. I have a bunch of pictures that I can produce if necessary. Um, environmental was down there. They parked at several different locations

along this proposed section of no parking. And it absolutely does not affect traffic flow whatsoever with the environmental trucks or any size cruiser parked along these areas. I do not see the need to put no parking in a section that does not cause a traffic or safety hazard. So, it would be my recommendation that we don't just arbitrarily throw off no parking signs.

Is there a motion on the table? Motion denied.

Seconded by Helen. Any opposed? Seeing none. Denied. All right. Uh tabled from last month.

Handicap spaces 65 pine plane plane street 65 plane motion. Motion dismissed.

Seconded by Helen. Any opposed?

Denied. Uh 150 Hall Street. Hello.

Oh yeah. Where we at? I know. She's a whole one. Which one did you just do? She got a garage.

Yes. Oh, I jumped.

Oh, it's so Oh, I see. Okay.

They're not going crazy yet. Why not?

Oh, I'm here.

Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. That uh that's a large shed, not a garage. Uh I would not hold them to that being off streetet parking. So if there was a motion to accept a handicap sp handicap space for this residence, I would entertain that. Motion to accept. Motion to accept by John.

Second. Seconded by Natalie. You got a question, Ellen? She's a homeowner.

She's a homeowner.

Yeah, that was a shed. She's got a homeowner. She's got a garage. It's not a It's not a garage. It's one of those large sheds. It's labeled as a garage, but you're not putting a car in there and opening up the door to be able to get out of it.

Is they can't fit.

That's probably one of those things.

Discussion.

Nope.

Good. Motion to accept was made and seconded. Any opposed?

Seeing none. I'll set the Thank you so much. Have a good day. So, it'll take about it'll take about 12 weeks. Um, you'll see maintenance out there.

They'll be doing the measurements. Okay.

Thank you so much. You're welcome. All right. New handicap spaces. We have 544 North Underwood. 544 North Underwood. Motion. Motion to table.

Second. Second. Seconded by Helen. Any opposed? None. Dabled. 1926 Robin.

Hello.

I understand it's hard and have signs here.

M Lambert, is your uh how long you been at this address? Excuse me. How long you been at this address? Almost now. Is your license um annotated on the back with the new address? Yeah, I just changed it over the other day.

Is there a registration in here?

Yes, there is. I actually put two because I messed up. The black truck is in my name. The red car behind the after is not yet. It's going in my name. So, as long as I have one spot, I'm good because my son owns the the car forward.

You have a vehicle registered to you?

Yeah. Excuse me. You have a vehicle registered to you? Yes. The red the black and a good license and a handicap blocker. Yep. Okay. I vote the whole thing. Any uh I don't see any issues with this. Is there a motion? Motion to accept. Second. Seconded by Natalie. Any opposed? Seeing none. All second. Yep.

Thank you. Give it about 12 weeks. I'll have the signs up. Have a nice day. 106 total sir.

It's Albony Street.

So you've been there only two months.

What is that? I'm sorry. It's You lived on Alony Street. How long you been on uh Tuttle Street, sir?

Almost two months now. Yeah. Okay. So, you'll end up updating your registration and your license. What's that? You'll end up updating your registration and license later.

I see no issues with this application. Motion approved. Second.

Any opposed? Seeing none, all set, sir.

About 12 weeks. About 12 weeks, the signs will be up. Oh, okay. Thank you.

Yes sir.

542 Walnut. Yes. Hello.

I see motions of application.

Motion to approve. Second. Seconded by John. Any opposed? Seeing none outside there. Thank you very much. And 116 Merchant Street. 116 Merchant. Motion. Is this a new one?

Yep. Uh table. Motion to table. Second.

Second by Natalie. Any opposed? Seeing none. Table. Uh rescending handicap spots. I will read through. We have Welli Street, Malbury Street, Handover Street, and Harrison Street. Is there a motion to accept?

Motion to accept. Seconded.

Second. Second by uh Helen. Any opposed?

Seeing none. With that, are you guys here for traffic? Uh no. Okay.

With that, meeting adjourned. Zoning board. Zoning board. Voices.